Search (1379 results, page 1 of 69)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.042385682 = product of:
      0.084771365 = sum of:
        0.084771365 = sum of:
          0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038397755 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.009423698 = weight(_text_:s in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009423698 = score(doc=402,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19069082 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036949914 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  2. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.04
    0.039505985 = product of:
      0.07901197 = sum of:
        0.07901197 = sum of:
          0.04525219 = weight(_text_:k in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04525219 = score(doc=4191,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.270-283
  3. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.04
    0.039454747 = product of:
      0.078909494 = sum of:
        0.078909494 = sum of:
          0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038397755 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003561823 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036949914 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2086-2096
  4. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.04
    0.036010437 = product of:
      0.07202087 = sum of:
        0.07202087 = product of:
          0.1080313 = sum of:
            0.009498195 = weight(_text_:s in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009498195 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
            0.09853311 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09853311 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  5. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.04
    0.036010437 = product of:
      0.07202087 = sum of:
        0.07202087 = product of:
          0.1080313 = sum of:
            0.009498195 = weight(_text_:s in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009498195 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
            0.09853311 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09853311 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  6. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1631-1644
  7. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.571-580
  8. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.246-256
  9. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.11, S.1355-1368
  10. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.791-810
  11. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
  12. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.03
    0.03265663 = product of:
      0.06531326 = sum of:
        0.06531326 = product of:
          0.09796988 = sum of:
            0.011753417 = weight(_text_:s in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011753417 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
            0.086216465 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086216465 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Pages
    185 S
  13. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.03
    0.03150913 = product of:
      0.06301826 = sum of:
        0.06301826 = product of:
          0.094527386 = sum of:
            0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00831092 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.086216465 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086216465 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
  14. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.03
    0.03150913 = product of:
      0.06301826 = sum of:
        0.06301826 = product of:
          0.094527386 = sum of:
            0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00831092 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
            0.086216465 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086216465 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
  15. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.03
    0.031009383 = product of:
      0.062018767 = sum of:
        0.062018767 = product of:
          0.09302815 = sum of:
            0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059363716 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
            0.08709178 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08709178 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
    Source
    Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.2, S.259-265
  16. Abbasi, M. K.; Frommholz, I.: Cluster-based polyrepresentation as science modelling approach for information retrieval (2015) 0.03
    0.027973054 = product of:
      0.055946108 = sum of:
        0.055946108 = product of:
          0.08391916 = sum of:
            0.07679551 = weight(_text_:k in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07679551 = score(doc=1691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
            0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007123646 = score(doc=1691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2301-2322
  17. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.03
    0.027007826 = product of:
      0.05401565 = sum of:
        0.05401565 = product of:
          0.08102348 = sum of:
            0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007123646 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
            0.07389983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07389983 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 57(2005) no.3, S.200-
  18. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.03
    0.027007826 = product of:
      0.05401565 = sum of:
        0.05401565 = product of:
          0.08102348 = sum of:
            0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007123646 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
            0.07389983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07389983 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
  19. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.03
    0.026373245 = product of:
      0.05274649 = sum of:
        0.05274649 = product of:
          0.079119734 = sum of:
            0.0724035 = weight(_text_:k in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0724035 = score(doc=5066,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
            0.006716238 = weight(_text_:s in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006716238 = score(doc=5066,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
    Source
    Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
  20. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.03
    0.025717532 = product of:
      0.051435065 = sum of:
        0.051435065 = product of:
          0.077152595 = sum of:
            0.0724035 = weight(_text_:k in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0724035 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The article by K. Järvelin & O. Persson published in JASIST 59(9), The DCI-Index: Discounted Cumulated Impact-Based Research Evaluation, (pp. 1433-1440) contains an unfortunate error in one of its formulas, Equation 3. The present paper gives the correction and an example of impact analysis based on the corrected formula.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352

Languages

Types

  • a 1332
  • m 23
  • s 20
  • el 12
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…