Search (593 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.042385682 = product of:
      0.084771365 = sum of:
        0.084771365 = sum of:
          0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038397755 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.009423698 = weight(_text_:s in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009423698 = score(doc=402,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19069082 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036949914 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  2. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.04
    0.039505985 = product of:
      0.07901197 = sum of:
        0.07901197 = sum of:
          0.04525219 = weight(_text_:k in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04525219 = score(doc=4191,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.270-283
  3. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.04
    0.039454747 = product of:
      0.078909494 = sum of:
        0.078909494 = sum of:
          0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038397755 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003561823 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036949914 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2086-2096
  4. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.246-256
  5. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.03
    0.032878954 = product of:
      0.06575791 = sum of:
        0.06575791 = sum of:
          0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031998128 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029681858 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030791596 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04545348 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.11, S.1355-1368
  6. Abbasi, M. K.; Frommholz, I.: Cluster-based polyrepresentation as science modelling approach for information retrieval (2015) 0.03
    0.027973054 = product of:
      0.055946108 = sum of:
        0.055946108 = product of:
          0.08391916 = sum of:
            0.07679551 = weight(_text_:k in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07679551 = score(doc=1691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
            0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 1691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007123646 = score(doc=1691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1691)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2301-2322
  7. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.03
    0.027007826 = product of:
      0.05401565 = sum of:
        0.05401565 = product of:
          0.08102348 = sum of:
            0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007123646 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
            0.07389983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07389983 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
  8. Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017) 0.02
    0.02413052 = product of:
      0.04826104 = sum of:
        0.04826104 = product of:
          0.072391555 = sum of:
            0.063996255 = weight(_text_:k in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063996255 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
            0.008395297 = weight(_text_:s in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008395297 = score(doc=4499,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag auf S.204-205: Vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten. Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1515/dmvm-2017-0064.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.208-214
  9. McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016) 0.02
    0.02045292 = product of:
      0.04090584 = sum of:
        0.04090584 = product of:
          0.061358757 = sum of:
            0.055422384 = weight(_text_:k in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055422384 = score(doc=3153,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.34156775 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
            0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059363716 = score(doc=3153,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.11, S.2684-2696
  10. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.02
    0.019779934 = product of:
      0.039559867 = sum of:
        0.039559867 = product of:
          0.0593398 = sum of:
            0.05430262 = weight(_text_:k in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05430262 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
            0.0050371783 = weight(_text_:s in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0050371783 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    BAHU (FH K)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
    GHBS
    BAHU (FH K)
    Pages
    270 S
  11. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.02
    0.019164078 = product of:
      0.038328156 = sum of:
        0.038328156 = product of:
          0.057492234 = sum of:
            0.0082256785 = weight(_text_:s in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0082256785 = score(doc=4654,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.1664486 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Footnote
    Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
    Pages
    976 S
    Type
    s
  12. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
  13. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Pages
    S.460-468
  14. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.02
    0.016317615 = product of:
      0.03263523 = sum of:
        0.03263523 = product of:
          0.048952844 = sum of:
            0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044797383 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
            0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00415546 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.411-422
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  15. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie : quo vadis? (2017) 0.02
    0.016317615 = product of:
      0.03263523 = sum of:
        0.03263523 = product of:
          0.048952844 = sum of:
            0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044797383 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
            0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00415546 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.388-397
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  16. Möller, T.: Woher stammt das Wissen über die Halbwertzeiten des Wissens? (2017) 0.02
    0.016317615 = product of:
      0.03263523 = sum of:
        0.03263523 = product of:
          0.048952844 = sum of:
            0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044797383 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
            0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00415546 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.398-410
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  17. Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012) 0.02
    0.016073458 = product of:
      0.032146916 = sum of:
        0.032146916 = product of:
          0.048220374 = sum of:
            0.04525219 = weight(_text_:k in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04525219 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is shown that under certain circumstances in particular for small data sets, the recently proposed citation impact indicators I3(6PR) and R(6,k) behave inconsistently when additional papers or citations are taken into consideration. Three simple examples are presented, in which the indicators fluctuate strongly and the ranking of scientists in the evaluated group is sometimes completely mixed up by minor changes in the database. The erratic behavior is traced to the specific way in which weights are attributed to the six percentile rank classes, specifically for the tied papers. For 100 percentile rank classes, the effects will be less serious. For the six classes, it is demonstrated that a different way of assigning weights avoids these problems, although the nonlinearity of the weights for the different percentile rank classes can still lead to (much less frequent) changes in the ranking. This behavior is not undesired because it can be used to correct for differences in citation behavior in different fields. Remaining deviations from the theoretical value R(6,k) = 1.91 can be avoided by a new scoring rule: the fractional scoring. Previously proposed consistency criteria are amended by another property of strict independence at which a performance indicator should aim.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2062-2073
  18. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.02
    0.015914515 = product of:
      0.03182903 = sum of:
        0.03182903 = product of:
          0.04774354 = sum of:
            0.0041976487 = weight(_text_:s in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041976487 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
            0.04354589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04354589 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54
  19. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.02
    0.015754566 = product of:
      0.03150913 = sum of:
        0.03150913 = product of:
          0.047263693 = sum of:
            0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00415546 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
            0.043108232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043108232 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.230-235
  20. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.02
    0.015754566 = product of:
      0.03150913 = sum of:
        0.03150913 = product of:
          0.047263693 = sum of:
            0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00415546 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
            0.043108232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043108232 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.236-245

Languages

  • e 559
  • d 32
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 582
  • el 8
  • m 8
  • s 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…