Search (1379 results, page 2 of 69)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017) 0.02
    0.02413052 = product of:
      0.04826104 = sum of:
        0.04826104 = product of:
          0.072391555 = sum of:
            0.063996255 = weight(_text_:k in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063996255 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
            0.008395297 = weight(_text_:s in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008395297 = score(doc=4499,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag auf S.204-205: Vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten. Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1515/dmvm-2017-0064.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.208-214
  2. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.02
    0.023310876 = product of:
      0.04662175 = sum of:
        0.04662175 = product of:
          0.069932625 = sum of:
            0.063996255 = weight(_text_:k in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063996255 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
            0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059363716 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.265-302
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.02
    0.02250284 = product of:
      0.04500568 = sum of:
        0.04500568 = product of:
          0.06750852 = sum of:
            0.06335306 = weight(_text_:k in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06335306 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
            0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00415546 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    BCGS (FH K)
    GHBS
    BCGS (FH K)
    Pages
    XI,450 S
  4. McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016) 0.02
    0.02045292 = product of:
      0.04090584 = sum of:
        0.04090584 = product of:
          0.061358757 = sum of:
            0.055422384 = weight(_text_:k in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055422384 = score(doc=3153,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.34156775 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
            0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059363716 = score(doc=3153,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.11, S.2684-2696
  5. Newby, G.B.; Greenberg, J.; Jones, P.: Open source software development and Lotka's law : bibliometric patterns in programming (2003) 0.02
    0.020157294 = product of:
      0.04031459 = sum of:
        0.04031459 = product of:
          0.06047188 = sum of:
            0.05430262 = weight(_text_:k in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05430262 = score(doc=5140,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
            0.006169259 = weight(_text_:s in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006169259 = score(doc=5140,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Newby, Greenberg, and Jones analyze programming productivity of open source software by counting registered developers contributions found in the Linux Software Map and in Scourceforge. Using seven years of data from a subset of the Linux directory tree LSM data provided 4503 files with 3341 unique author names. The distribution follows Lotka's Law with an exponent of 2.82 as verified by the Kolmolgorov-Smirnov one sample goodness of fit test. Scourceforge data is broken into developers and administrators, but when both were used as authors the Lotka distribution exponent of 2.55 produces the lowest error. This would not be significant by the K-S test but the 3.54% maximum error would indicate a fit and calls into question the appropriateness of K-S for large populations of authors.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.2, S.169-178
  6. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.02
    0.019779934 = product of:
      0.039559867 = sum of:
        0.039559867 = product of:
          0.0593398 = sum of:
            0.05430262 = weight(_text_:k in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05430262 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
            0.0050371783 = weight(_text_:s in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0050371783 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    BAHU (FH K)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
    GHBS
    BAHU (FH K)
    Pages
    270 S
  7. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.02
    0.019164078 = product of:
      0.038328156 = sum of:
        0.038328156 = product of:
          0.057492234 = sum of:
            0.0082256785 = weight(_text_:s in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0082256785 = score(doc=4654,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.1664486 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Footnote
    Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
    Pages
    976 S
    Type
    s
  8. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.02
    0.01866093 = product of:
      0.03732186 = sum of:
        0.03732186 = product of:
          0.05598279 = sum of:
            0.006716238 = weight(_text_:s in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006716238 = score(doc=80,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
    Source
    IASLIC bulletin. 41(1996) no.1, S.37-38
  9. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: ¬The standard impact factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals (1996) 0.02
    0.018648703 = product of:
      0.037297405 = sum of:
        0.037297405 = product of:
          0.055946104 = sum of:
            0.051197007 = weight(_text_:k in 5075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051197007 = score(doc=5075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 5075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5075)
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 5075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=5075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5075)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces the standard impact factor for particular fields of science (Ig) and the relative impact factor K for scientific journals. The technique for the calculation of the standard impact factor for a field is an inherent part of a methods which allows a cross field evaluation of scientific journals. This method for evaluating scientific journals elaborated in 1988 was aimed at the analysis of Russian journals covered by the SCI database; it was also used for chemical journals and for journals in the life sciences
    Source
    Scientometrics. 35(1996) no.2, S.283-290
  10. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.02
    0.018605635 = product of:
      0.03721127 = sum of:
        0.03721127 = product of:
          0.0558169 = sum of:
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=5275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
            0.052255075 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052255075 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.408-430
  11. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.02
    0.018605635 = product of:
      0.03721127 = sum of:
        0.03721127 = product of:
          0.0558169 = sum of:
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
            0.052255075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052255075 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
  12. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
  13. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  14. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
    Source
    Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.1, S.89-95
  15. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
    Source
    Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.1, S.41-60
  16. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  17. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Pages
    S.341-350
  18. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
  19. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Pages
    S.460-468
  20. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.02
    0.017331619 = product of:
      0.034663238 = sum of:
        0.034663238 = product of:
          0.051994853 = sum of:
            0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044797383 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
            0.0071974685 = weight(_text_:s in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071974685 = score(doc=1075,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.14564252 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    126 S

Languages

Types

  • a 1332
  • m 23
  • s 20
  • el 12
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…