Search (615 results, page 1 of 31)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Pfister, E.; Wittwer, B.; Wolff, M.: Metadaten - Manuelle Datenpflege vs. Automatisieren : ein Praxisbericht zu Metadatenmanagement an der ETH-Bibliothek (2017) 0.06
    0.05745396 = product of:
      0.08618094 = sum of:
        0.0072986903 = weight(_text_:e in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072986903 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
        0.07888225 = sum of:
          0.03556131 = weight(_text_:von in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03556131 = score(doc=5630,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.29180688 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
          0.043320935 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043320935 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Neue Entwicklungen im Bibliothekswesen und in der Technologie führen zu neuen ufgaben, die spezialisierte Fachkräfte erfordern. Die ETH-Bibliothek reagierte darauf, indem sie das Pilotprojekt "Metadatenmanagement" startete, welches sich mit Datenanalysen, -einspielungen und -mutationen, Datenmappings, der Erstellung eines Datenflussdiagramms, sowie mit der Einführung von RDA und GND beschäftigte. Nach zwei Jahren zeigte sich, dass zahlreiche Aufgabengebiete existieren, welche von Metadatenspezialisten, als Schnittstelle zwischen den Fachabteilungen und der IT, übernommen werden können. Dieser Bericht fasst die getätigten Arbeiten, Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse der zweijährigen Pilotphase zusammen.
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25
  2. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.04
    0.04412824 = product of:
      0.06619236 = sum of:
        0.016682722 = weight(_text_:e in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016682722 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
        0.04950964 = product of:
          0.09901928 = sum of:
            0.09901928 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09901928 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Language
    e
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.04
    0.04412824 = product of:
      0.06619236 = sum of:
        0.016682722 = weight(_text_:e in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016682722 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
        0.04950964 = product of:
          0.09901928 = sum of:
            0.09901928 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09901928 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019) 0.04
    0.04329444 = product of:
      0.06494166 = sum of:
        0.00625602 = weight(_text_:e in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00625602 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
        0.058685638 = sum of:
          0.021553408 = weight(_text_:von in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021553408 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.03713223 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03713223 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:22:49
    Language
    e
  5. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.04
    0.038612213 = product of:
      0.057918318 = sum of:
        0.0145973805 = weight(_text_:e in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0145973805 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
        0.043320935 = product of:
          0.08664187 = sum of:
            0.08664187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664187 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Language
    e
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.04
    0.038612213 = product of:
      0.057918318 = sum of:
        0.0145973805 = weight(_text_:e in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0145973805 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
        0.043320935 = product of:
          0.08664187 = sum of:
            0.08664187 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664187 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.04
    0.038612213 = product of:
      0.057918318 = sum of:
        0.0145973805 = weight(_text_:e in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0145973805 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
        0.043320935 = product of:
          0.08664187 = sum of:
            0.08664187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08664187 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  8. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.04
    0.037562978 = product of:
      0.11268893 = sum of:
        0.11268893 = sum of:
          0.050801873 = weight(_text_:von in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050801873 = score(doc=1032,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.416867 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.061887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061887052 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Wenn die Frage danach, ob Internetresoourcen in Bibliothekskatalogen überhaupt nachgewiesen werden sollen, mit Ja beantwortet wird, müssen eine Reihe weitere Konsequenzen bedacht werden. Zuallererst ist zu überprüfen, ob die traditionellen Katalogisierungsmethoden auf den Nachweis von elektronischen Dokumenten angewendet werden können und welcher Änderungsbedarf wie umgesetzt werden kann
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  9. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.04
    0.037562978 = product of:
      0.11268893 = sum of:
        0.11268893 = sum of:
          0.050801873 = weight(_text_:von in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050801873 = score(doc=2275,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.416867 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.061887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061887052 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  10. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.03
    0.03309618 = product of:
      0.04964427 = sum of:
        0.01251204 = weight(_text_:e in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01251204 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
        0.03713223 = product of:
          0.07426446 = sum of:
            0.07426446 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07426446 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
    Language
    e
  11. Keßler, M.: KIM - Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten : Gemeinsamer Workshop der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und des Arbeitskreises Elektronisches Publizieren (AKEP) (2007) 0.03
    0.03138573 = product of:
      0.09415719 = sum of:
        0.09415719 = sum of:
          0.057024963 = weight(_text_:von in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057024963 = score(doc=2406,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.46793205 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
          0.03713223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03713223 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Das Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten (KIM) ist eine Informations- und Kommunikationsplattform für Metadatenanwender und -entwickler zur Verbesserung der Interoperabilität von Metadaten im deutschsprachigen Raum. KIM unterstützt und fördert die Erarbeitung von Metadatenstandards, die interoperable Gestaltung von Formaten und damit die optimale Nutzung von Metadaten in digitalen Informationsumgebungen mittels Lehrmaterialien, Schulungen und Beratungen. Das Kompetenzzentrum entsteht im Rahmen des von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) geförderten Projekts KIM unter der Federführung der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen (SUB) in Zusammenarbeit mit der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB). Projektpartner sind in der Schweiz die Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft HTW Chur, die Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich und in Österreich die Universität Wien. Aufgabe des Kompetenzzentrums ist es, die Interoperabilität von Metadaten zu verbessern. Interoperabilität ist die Fähigkeit zur Zusammenarbeit von heterogenen Systemen. Datenbestände unabhängiger Systeme können ausgetauscht oder zusammengeführt werden, um z. B. eine systemübergreifende Suche oder das Browsen zu ermöglichen. Daten werden zum Teil in sehr unterschiedlichen Datenbanksystemen gespeichert. Interoperabilität entsteht dann, wenn die Systeme umfangreiche Schnittstellen implementieren, die ein weitgehend verlustfreies Mapping der internen Datenrepräsentation ermöglichen.
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 20(2008) H.1, S.22-24
  12. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.03
    0.030459404 = product of:
      0.045689106 = sum of:
        0.014745582 = weight(_text_:e in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014745582 = score(doc=3280,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
        0.030943526 = product of:
          0.061887052 = sum of:
            0.061887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061887052 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.03
    0.030459404 = product of:
      0.045689106 = sum of:
        0.014745582 = weight(_text_:e in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014745582 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.030943526 = product of:
          0.061887052 = sum of:
            0.061887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061887052 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  14. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.03
    0.030459404 = product of:
      0.045689106 = sum of:
        0.014745582 = weight(_text_:e in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014745582 = score(doc=3282,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
        0.030943526 = product of:
          0.061887052 = sum of:
            0.061887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061887052 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  15. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.03
    0.028899975 = product of:
      0.043349963 = sum of:
        0.008341361 = weight(_text_:e in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008341361 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
        0.0350086 = product of:
          0.0700172 = sum of:
            0.0700172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0700172 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Language
    e
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  16. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.03
    0.028899975 = product of:
      0.043349963 = sum of:
        0.008341361 = weight(_text_:e in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008341361 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.0350086 = product of:
          0.0700172 = sum of:
            0.0700172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0700172 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  17. Warner, S.: E-prints and the Open Archives Initiative (2003) 0.03
    0.027313992 = product of:
      0.04097099 = sum of:
        0.019310521 = weight(_text_:e in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019310521 = score(doc=4772,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.29411736 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
        0.021660468 = product of:
          0.043320935 = sum of:
            0.043320935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043320935 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Open Archives Initiative (OAI) was created as a practical way to promote interoperability between e-print repositories. Although the scope of the OAI has been broadened, e-print repositories still represent a significant fraction of OAI data providers. This article presents a brief survey of OAI e-print repositories, and of services using metadata harvested from e-print repositories using the OAI protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI-PMH). It then discusses several situations where metadata harvesting may be used to further improve the utility of e-print archives as a component of the scholarly communication infrastructure.
    Date
    18.12.2005 13:18:22
    Language
    e
  18. Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021) 0.02
    0.024821278 = product of:
      0.07446383 = sum of:
        0.07446383 = sum of:
          0.0373316 = weight(_text_:von in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0373316 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.30633342 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.03713223 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03713223 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In den Handlungsempfehlungen der Koordinierungsstelle für die Erhaltung des schriftlichen Kulturguts (KEK) von 2015 (KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen) wird ein nationaler Standard bei der Dokumentation von Bestandserhaltung gefordert: "In den Bibliothekskatalogen sollten künftig für den verbundübergreifenden Abgleich Bestandserhaltungsmaßnahmen für die Bestände ab 1851 [.] in standardisierter Form dokumentiert und recherchierbar gemacht werden. Dies bedarf einer gemeinsamen Festlegung mit den Bibliotheksverbünden [.]." In den KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen werden auf der Basis einer im Jahr 2015 erfolgten Erhebung für Monografien fast neun Millionen Bände aus dem Zeitabschnitt 1851-1990 als Pflichtexemplare an Bundes- und Ländereinrichtungen angegeben, die akut vom Papierzerfall bedroht und als erste Stufe einer Gesamtstrategie zu entsäuern sind. Ein Ziel der KEK ist es, standardisierte und zertifizierte Verfahren zur Massenentsäuerung zu fördern. Im Metadatenformat sind zunächst fünf Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung in Form von kontrolliertem Vokabular dokumentiert: DEZ, Mg3/MBG, METE, MgO, MMMC[2]. Mit diesen Angaben, die gezielt selektiert werden können, ist mittel- und langfristig die Anwendung einzelner Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung abrufbar und statistisch auswertbar.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  19. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.02
    0.024367524 = product of:
      0.036551286 = sum of:
        0.011796465 = weight(_text_:e in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011796465 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
        0.02475482 = product of:
          0.04950964 = sum of:
            0.04950964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04950964 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
    Language
    e
  20. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.02
    0.022620548 = product of:
      0.06786164 = sum of:
        0.06786164 = sum of:
          0.043106817 = weight(_text_:von in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043106817 = score(doc=5650,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.02475482 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02475482 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045677755 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Immer mehr Institutionen erkennen die Bedeutung von Metadaten für die Auffindung elektronischer Dokumente und entwickeln ihr eigenes, domain-spezifisches Application Profile. Sie wählen aus einem bereits existierenden Set von Metadaten ein für ihre Bedürfnisse passendes Subset aus, fügen lokale Ergänzungen hinzu und passen die Definitionen an. Um andere über die eigenen Anwendungen zu informieren, ist es sinnvoll, die jeweiligen Application Profiles zu veröffentlichen. Dadurch wird eine Nachnutzung ermöglicht und neuen Anwendern die Entwicklung eigener Profile erleichtert. Weitere Vorteile wären eine Standardisierung der Metadatenelemente und -formate und Erhöhung der Interoperabilität. In diesem Kontext entstehende Fragen wurden auf dem 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop diskutiert, der vom 23. bis 24. November 2000 in Bonn stattfand. Die einzelnen Vorträge finden sich unter <http://lwww. schemas-forum.org/workshops/ws2/Programme.htm/>. SCHEMAS1 ist die Bezeichnung für ein "Forum for Metadata Schema Implementors". Dieses EU-Projekt wird getragen von Makx Dekkers (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Tom Baker (GMD) und Rachel Heery (UKOLN). In seiner Einführung erläuterte Makx Dekkers die Ziele von SCHEMAS: Da es viele verschiedene Schemes zur Beschreibung von Internet-Ressourcen gibt, wächst die Notwendigkeit der Entwicklung von Standards zur Vermeidung von Doppelarbeit und Konfusion. SCHEMAS stellt Informationen bereit (Metadata Watch Reports, Standards Framework Reports, Guidelines), veranstaltet Workshops und entwickelt ein Registry, in dem Metadatenprofile gesammelt werden sollen. Dadurch sollen Anwender von Metadatenformaten über den Status und neue Entwicklungen im Bereich Metadaten informiert werden. Über die Definition des Begriffs Application Profile war bereits beim 8. Workshop der Dublin Core Metadata Initiative in Ottawa im Oktober2 diskutiert worden. Rachel Heery legte nun folgende Definition vor: In einem "Namespace Schema" werden neue Elemente genannt und definiert, so dass ein standardisiertes Set entsteht. Ein "Application Profile" nutzt bereits vorhandene Elemente aus einem oder mehreren Namespace Schemas nach und optimiert diese für eine bestimmte Anwendung. Da die Zahl der Namespaces und Application Profiles ständig zunimmt, ist es sinnvoll, sie an einer zentralen Stelle zu registrieren. Diese Zentralstelle will das SCHEMAS Registry werden. Tom Baker beschrieb dessen Funktion mit einem Vergleich aus der Linguistik: Metadaten sind eine Sprache, Registries das Wörterbuch. Wie ein Wörterbuch, so hat auch ein Registry zwei Aufgaben: Es beschreibt Sprache anhand von Gebrauchsbeispielen und schreibt diesen Gebrauch vor, indem es Empfehlungen gibt (describe and prescribe). Dadurch entsteht ein Standard für diese Sprache
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22

Years

Languages

  • e 531
  • d 81
  • pt 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 538
  • el 92
  • m 24
  • s 20
  • n 5
  • x 5
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects