Search (57 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Shiri, A.; Revie, C.: Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus-enhanced search interface (2005) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Li, D.; Kwong, C.-P.; Lee, D.L.: Unified linear subspace approach to semantic analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 3321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=3321,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3321, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Schaefer, A.; Jordan, M.; Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.: Active support for query formulation in virtual digital libraries : a case study with DAFFODIL (2005) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=4296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Bayer, O.; Höhfeld, S.; Josbächer, F.; Kimm, N.; Kradepohl, I.; Kwiatkowski, M.; Puschmann, C.; Sabbagh, M.; Werner, N.; Vollmer, U.: Evaluation of an ontology-based knowledge-management-system : a case study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 (2005) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Pal, D.; Mitra, M.; Datta, K.: Improving query expansion using WordNet (2014) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=1545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study proposes a new way of using WordNet for query expansion (QE). We choose candidate expansion terms from a set of pseudo-relevant documents; however, the usefulness of these terms is measured based on their definitions provided in a hand-crafted lexical resource such as WordNet. Experiments with a number of standard TREC collections WordNet-based that this method outperforms existing WordNet-based methods. It also compares favorably with established QE methods such as KLD and RM3. Leveraging earlier work in which a combination of QE methods was found to outperform each individual method (as well as other well-known QE methods), we next propose a combination-based QE method that takes into account three different aspects of a candidate expansion term's usefulness: (a) its distribution in the pseudo-relevant documents and in the target corpus, (b) its statistical association with query terms, and (c) its semantic relation with the query, as determined by the overlap between the WordNet definitions of the term and query terms. This combination of diverse sources of information appears to work well on a number of test collections, viz., TREC123, TREC5, TREC678, TREC robust (new), and TREC910 collections, and yields significant improvements over competing methods on most of these collections.
  7. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
  8. Gnoli, C.; Santis, R. de; Pusterla, L.: Commerce, see also Rhetoric : cross-discipline relationships as authority data for enhanced retrieval (2015) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ru, C.; Tang, J.; Li, S.; Xie, S.; Wang, T.: Using semantic similarity to reduce wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction (2018) 0.01
    0.007484829 = product of:
      0.014969658 = sum of:
        0.014969658 = product of:
          0.029939316 = sum of:
            0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029939316 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.01
    0.006171255 = product of:
      0.01234251 = sum of:
        0.01234251 = product of:
          0.02468502 = sum of:
            0.02468502 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02468502 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]
  11. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.006171255 = product of:
      0.01234251 = sum of:
        0.01234251 = product of:
          0.02468502 = sum of:
            0.02468502 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02468502 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  12. Gillitzer, B.: Yewno (2017) 0.01
    0.006171255 = product of:
      0.01234251 = sum of:
        0.01234251 = product of:
          0.02468502 = sum of:
            0.02468502 = weight(_text_:22 in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02468502 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 10:16:49
  13. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.: FACET: thesaurus retrieval with semantic term expansion (2002) 0.01
    0.0059878635 = product of:
      0.011975727 = sum of:
        0.011975727 = product of:
          0.023951454 = sum of:
            0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023951454 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking : the art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all (2012) 0.01
    0.0059878635 = product of:
      0.011975727 = sum of:
        0.011975727 = product of:
          0.023951454 = sum of:
            0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023951454 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014) 0.01
    0.005399848 = product of:
      0.010799696 = sum of:
        0.010799696 = product of:
          0.021599391 = sum of:
            0.021599391 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021599391 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01
    0.00523938 = product of:
      0.01047876 = sum of:
        0.01047876 = product of:
          0.02095752 = sum of:
            0.02095752 = weight(_text_:c in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02095752 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
  17. Case, D.O.: Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2002) 0.00
    0.0044908975 = product of:
      0.008981795 = sum of:
        0.008981795 = product of:
          0.01796359 = sum of:
            0.01796359 = weight(_text_:c in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01796359 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.114332706 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in: iwp 65(2014) H.2, S.143-144 (C. Wolff)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 5

Types

  • a 51
  • el 7
  • m 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…