-
Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023)
0.07
0.067262225 = product of:
0.13452445 = sum of:
0.13452445 = sum of:
0.103880174 = weight(_text_:n in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103880174 = score(doc=992,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.53260374 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:09:06
-
Kudlow, P.; Dziadyk, D.B.; Rutledge, A.; Shachak, A.; Eysenbach, G.: ¬The citation advantage of promoted articles in a cross-publisher distribution platform : a 12-month randomized controlled trial (2020)
0.02
0.016424898 = product of:
0.032849796 = sum of:
0.032849796 = product of:
0.06569959 = sum of:
0.06569959 = weight(_text_:n in 5969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06569959 = score(doc=5969,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 5969, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5969)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There is currently a paucity of evidence-based strategies that have been shown to increase citations of peer-reviewed articles following their publication. We conducted a 12-month randomized controlled trial to examine whether the promotion of article links in an online cross-publisher distribution platform (TrendMD) affects citations. In all, 3,200 articles published in 64 peer-reviewed journals across eight subject areas were block randomized at the subject level to either the TrendMD group (n = 1,600) or the control group (n = 1,600) of the study. Our primary outcome compares the mean citations of articles randomized to TrendMD versus control after 12 months. Articles randomized to TrendMD showed a 50% increase in mean citations relative to control at 12 months. The difference in mean citations at 12 months for articles randomized to TrendMD versus control was 5.06, 95% confidence interval [2.87, 7.25], was statistically significant (p?<?.001) and found in three of eight subject areas. At 6 months following publication, articles randomized to TrendMD showed a smaller, yet statistically significant (p = .005), 21% increase in mean citations, relative to control. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate how an intervention can be used to increase citations of peer-reviewed articles after they have been published.
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields (2020)
0.01
0.011614156 = product of:
0.023228312 = sum of:
0.023228312 = product of:
0.046456624 = sum of:
0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 5952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456624 = score(doc=5952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 5952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Costas, R.; Rijcke, S. de; Marres, N.: "Heterogeneous couplings" : operationalizing network perspectives to study science-society interactions through social media metrics (2021)
0.01
0.011614156 = product of:
0.023228312 = sum of:
0.023228312 = product of:
0.046456624 = sum of:
0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456624 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ikae, C.; Savoy, J.: Gender identification on Twitter (2022)
0.01
0.011614156 = product of:
0.023228312 = sum of:
0.023228312 = product of:
0.046456624 = sum of:
0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456624 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To determine the author of a text's gender, various feature types have been suggested (e.g., function words, n-gram of letters, etc.) leading to a huge number of stylistic markers. To determine the target category, different machine learning models have been suggested (e.g., logistic regression, decision tree, k nearest-neighbors, support vector machine, naïve Bayes, neural networks, and random forest). In this study, our first objective is to know whether or not the same model always proposes the best effectiveness when considering similar corpora under the same conditions. Thus, based on 7 CLEF-PAN collections, this study analyzes the effectiveness of 10 different classifiers. Our second aim is to propose a 2-stage feature selection to reduce the feature size to a few hundred terms without any significant change in the performance level compared to approaches using all the attributes (increase of around 5% after applying the proposed feature selection). Based on our experiments, neural network or random forest tend, on average, to produce the highest effectiveness. Moreover, empirical evidence indicates that reducing the feature set size to around 300 without penalizing the effectiveness is possible. Finally, based on such reduced feature sizes, an analysis reveals some of the specific terms that clearly discriminate between the 2 genders.
-
Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022)
0.01
0.010725497 = product of:
0.021450995 = sum of:
0.021450995 = product of:
0.04290199 = sum of:
0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04290199 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2022 19:22:26
-
Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021)
0.01
0.0091932835 = product of:
0.018386567 = sum of:
0.018386567 = product of:
0.036773134 = sum of:
0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036773134 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.01
0.0091932835 = product of:
0.018386567 = sum of:
0.018386567 = product of:
0.036773134 = sum of:
0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036773134 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:37:33
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:07:12
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
