-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.08
0.08065815 = product of:
0.1613163 = sum of:
0.1613163 = sum of:
0.087462 = weight(_text_:w in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087462 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.073854305 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073854305 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
0.01
0.012754875 = product of:
0.02550975 = sum of:
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0510195 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Barth, A.; Leydesdorff, L.: Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) (2014)
0.01
0.012754875 = product of:
0.02550975 = sum of:
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0510195 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: ¬The wisdom of citing scientists (2014)
0.01
0.012754875 = product of:
0.02550975 = sum of:
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 1293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0510195 = score(doc=1293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.012309051 = product of:
0.024618102 = sum of:
0.024618102 = product of:
0.049236204 = sum of:
0.049236204 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049236204 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)
0.01
0.01093275 = product of:
0.0218655 = sum of:
0.0218655 = product of:
0.043731 = sum of:
0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043731 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.01
0.009110626 = product of:
0.018221252 = sum of:
0.018221252 = product of:
0.036442503 = sum of:
0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036442503 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.01
0.009110626 = product of:
0.018221252 = sum of:
0.018221252 = product of:
0.036442503 = sum of:
0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036442503 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: ¬The Anna Karenina principle : a way of thinking about success in science (2012)
0.01
0.009110626 = product of:
0.018221252 = sum of:
0.018221252 = product of:
0.036442503 = sum of:
0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036442503 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Thor, A.; Marx, W.; Schier, H.: ¬The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences : an exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute (2016)
0.01
0.009110626 = product of:
0.018221252 = sum of:
0.018221252 = product of:
0.036442503 = sum of:
0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 3160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036442503 = score(doc=3160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Mingers, J.: Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the Leiden rankings (2019)
0.01
0.009110626 = product of:
0.018221252 = sum of:
0.018221252 = product of:
0.036442503 = sum of:
0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036442503 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Leiden Rankings can be used for grouping research universities by considering universities which are not statistically significantly different as homogeneous sets. The groups and intergroup relations can be analyzed and visualized using tools from network analysis. Using the so-called "excellence indicator" PPtop-10%-the proportion of the top-10% most-highly-cited papers assigned to a university-we pursue a classification using (a) overlapping stability intervals, (b) statistical-significance tests, and (c) effect sizes of differences among 902 universities in 54 countries; we focus on the UK, Germany, Brazil, and the USA as national examples. Although the groupings remain largely the same using different statistical significance levels or overlapping stability intervals, these classifications are uncorrelated with those based on effect sizes. Effect sizes for the differences between universities are small (w < .2). The more detailed analysis of universities at the country level suggests that distinctions beyond three or perhaps four groups of universities (high, middle, low) may not be meaningful. Given similar institutional incentives, isomorphism within each eco-system of universities should not be underestimated. Our results suggest that networks based on overlapping stability intervals can provide a first impression of the relevant groupings among universities. However, the clusters are not well-defined divisions between groups of universities.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.007693157 = product of:
0.015386314 = sum of:
0.015386314 = product of:
0.030772628 = sum of:
0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030772628 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
