Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"x"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.06
    0.05664634 = sum of:
      0.043984145 = product of:
        0.17593658 = sum of:
          0.17593658 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17593658 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3756532 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04430912 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012662194 = product of:
        0.03798658 = sum of:
          0.03798658 = weight(_text_:t in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03798658 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04430912 = queryNorm
              0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05
    0.05278097 = product of:
      0.10556194 = sum of:
        0.10556194 = product of:
          0.42224777 = sum of:
            0.42224777 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42224777 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3756532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. Jersek, T.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung mit Lingo : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2012) 0.05
    0.051239364 = product of:
      0.10247873 = sum of:
        0.10247873 = product of:
          0.15371808 = sum of:
            0.09293955 = weight(_text_:v in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09293955 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21584865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
            0.06077853 = weight(_text_:t in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06077853 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    V. 56 S
  4. Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010) 0.03
    0.027201181 = product of:
      0.054402363 = sum of:
        0.054402363 = product of:
          0.08160354 = sum of:
            0.045583896 = weight(_text_:t in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045583896 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
            0.036019642 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036019642 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15516299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  5. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.02
    0.021992072 = product of:
      0.043984145 = sum of:
        0.043984145 = product of:
          0.17593658 = sum of:
            0.17593658 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17593658 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3756532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  6. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.02
    0.021992072 = product of:
      0.043984145 = sum of:
        0.043984145 = product of:
          0.17593658 = sum of:
            0.17593658 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17593658 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3756532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  7. Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017) 0.02
    0.01813412 = product of:
      0.03626824 = sum of:
        0.03626824 = product of:
          0.05440236 = sum of:
            0.030389264 = weight(_text_:t in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030389264 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.17409891 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
            0.024013096 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024013096 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15516299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.02
    0.017593658 = product of:
      0.035187315 = sum of:
        0.035187315 = product of:
          0.14074926 = sum of:
            0.14074926 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14074926 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3756532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  9. Pohl, O.: Konzept und prototypische Erstellung eines Informationssystems auf VuFind-Basis für die Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (2012) 0.02
    0.015489925 = product of:
      0.03097985 = sum of:
        0.03097985 = product of:
          0.09293955 = sum of:
            0.09293955 = weight(_text_:v in 1564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09293955 = score(doc=1564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21584865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 1564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1564)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    V, 70 S
  10. Sommer, M.: Automatische Generierung von DDC-Notationen für Hochschulveröffentlichungen (2012) 0.01
    0.0116174435 = product of:
      0.023234887 = sum of:
        0.023234887 = product of:
          0.06970466 = sum of:
            0.06970466 = weight(_text_:v in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06970466 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21584865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    V, 67 S
  11. Castellanos Ardila, J.P.: Investigation of an OSLC-domain targeting ISO 26262 : focus on the left side of the software V-model (2016) 0.01
    0.0109530315 = product of:
      0.021906063 = sum of:
        0.021906063 = product of:
          0.06571819 = sum of:
            0.06571819 = weight(_text_:v in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06571819 = score(doc=5819,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21584865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.3044642 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Industries have adopted a standardized set of practices for developing their products. In the automotive domain, the provision of safety-compliant systems is guided by ISO 26262, a standard that specifies a set of requirements and recommendations for developing automotive safety-critical systems. For being in compliance with ISO 26262, the safety lifecycle proposed by the standard must be included in the development process of a vehicle. Besides, a safety case that shows that the system is acceptably safe has to be provided. The provision of a safety case implies the execution of a precise documentation process. This process makes sure that the work products are available and traceable. Further, the documentation management is defined in the standard as a mandatory activity and guidelines are proposed/imposed for its elaboration. It would be appropriate to point out that a well-documented safety lifecycle will provide the necessary inputs for the generation of an ISO 26262-compliant safety case. The OSLC (Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration) standard and the maturing stack of semantic web technologies represent a promising integration platform for enabling semantic interoperability between the tools involved in the safety lifecycle. Tools for requirements, architecture, development management, among others, are expected to interact and shared data with the help of domains specifications created in OSLC. This thesis proposes the creation of an OSLC tool-chain infrastructure for sharing safety-related information, where fragments of safety information can be generated. The steps carried out during the elaboration of this master thesis consist in the identification, representation, and shaping of the RDF resources needed for the creation of a safety case. The focus of the thesis is limited to a tiny portion of the ISO 26262 left-hand side of the V-model, more exactly part 6 clause 8 of the standard: Software unit design and implementation. Regardless of the use of a restricted portion of the standard during the execution of this thesis, the findings can be extended to other parts, and the conclusions can be generalize. This master thesis is considered one of the first steps towards the provision of an OSLC-based and ISO 26262-compliant methodological approach for representing and shaping the work products resulting from the execution of the safety lifecycle, documentation required in the conformation of an ISO-compliant safety case.
  12. Jezior, T.: Adaption und Integration von Suchmaschinentechnologie in mor(!)dernen OPACs (2013) 0.01
    0.010129755 = product of:
      0.02025951 = sum of:
        0.02025951 = product of:
          0.06077853 = sum of:
            0.06077853 = weight(_text_:t in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06077853 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Bredack, J.: Automatische Extraktion fachterminologischer Mehrwortbegriffe : ein Verfahrensvergleich (2016) 0.01
    0.009681203 = product of:
      0.019362407 = sum of:
        0.019362407 = product of:
          0.05808722 = sum of:
            0.05808722 = weight(_text_:v in 3194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05808722 = score(doc=3194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21584865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 3194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    V, 98 S
  14. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.01
    0.0080043655 = product of:
      0.016008731 = sum of:
        0.016008731 = product of:
          0.048026193 = sum of:
            0.048026193 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048026193 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15516299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  15. Schaffner, V.: FRBR in MAB2 und Primo - ein kafkaesker Prozess? : Möglichkeiten der FRBRisierung von MAB2-Datensätzen in Primo exemplarisch dargestellt an Datensätzen zu Franz Kafkas "Der Process" (2011) 0.01
    0.0077449623 = product of:
      0.015489925 = sum of:
        0.015489925 = product of:
          0.046469774 = sum of:
            0.046469774 = weight(_text_:v in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046469774 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21584865 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.21528868 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.01
    0.007162818 = product of:
      0.014325636 = sum of:
        0.014325636 = product of:
          0.04297691 = sum of:
            0.04297691 = weight(_text_:t in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04297691 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.24621303 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
  17. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.01
    0.007074926 = product of:
      0.014149852 = sum of:
        0.014149852 = product of:
          0.042449556 = sum of:
            0.042449556 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042449556 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15516299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  18. Groß, T.: Automatische Indexierung von wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Dokumenten : Implementierung und Evaluierung am Beispiel der Deutschen Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2010) 0.01
    0.006331097 = product of:
      0.012662194 = sum of:
        0.012662194 = product of:
          0.03798658 = sum of:
            0.03798658 = weight(_text_:t in 2078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03798658 = score(doc=2078,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 2078, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2078)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Walther, T.: Erschließung historischer Bestände mit RDA (2015) 0.01
    0.006331097 = product of:
      0.012662194 = sum of:
        0.012662194 = product of:
          0.03798658 = sum of:
            0.03798658 = weight(_text_:t in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03798658 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17455173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.01
    0.0060032737 = product of:
      0.012006547 = sum of:
        0.012006547 = product of:
          0.036019642 = sum of:
            0.036019642 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036019642 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15516299 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04430912 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47