Search (62 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.09 
    0.0930887 = product of:
  0.1861774 = sum of:
    0.1861774 = sum of:
      0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.099987686 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045439374 = queryNorm
          0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08618971 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045439374 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.9-22
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.05 
    0.05319354 = product of:
  0.10638708 = sum of:
    0.10638708 = sum of:
      0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05713582 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045439374 = queryNorm
          0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049251262 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045439374 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  3. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.05 
    0.04654435 = product of:
  0.0930887 = sum of:
    0.0930887 = sum of:
      0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049993843 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045439374 = queryNorm
          0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043094855 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045439374 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  4. Endruweit, G.: Probleme sozialwissenschaftlicher Begriffsbildung (1996) 0.03 
    0.030300846 = product of:
  0.060601693 = sum of:
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = weight(_text_:i in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121203385 = score(doc=3913,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Metakritik zu den Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? und der Replik von I. Dahlberg
  5. Svenonius, E.: Indexical contents (1982) 0.03 
    0.030300846 = product of:
  0.060601693 = sum of:
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = weight(_text_:i in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121203385 = score(doc=27,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.70719934 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsbeziehungen und Definitionstheorie (1985) 0.03 
    0.02856791 = product of:
  0.05713582 = sum of:
    0.05713582 = product of:
      0.11427164 = sum of:
        0.11427164 = weight(_text_:i in 1613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11427164 = score(doc=1613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 1613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Über Gegenstände, Begriffe, Definitionen und Benennungen: zur möglichen Neufassung von DIN 2330 (1976) 0.03 
    0.02856791 = product of:
  0.05713582 = sum of:
    0.05713582 = product of:
      0.11427164 = sum of:
        0.11427164 = weight(_text_:i in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11427164 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields (1992) 0.03 
    0.025250703 = product of:
  0.050501406 = sum of:
    0.050501406 = product of:
      0.10100281 = sum of:
        0.10100281 = weight(_text_:i in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10100281 = score(doc=3217,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this chapter I propose that frames provide the fundamental representation of knowledge in human cognition. In the first section, I raise problems with the feature list representations often found in theories of knowledge, and I sketch the solutions that frames provide to them. In the second section, I examine the three fundamental concepts of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. Because frames also represents the attributes, values, structural invariants, and constraints within a frame, the mechanism that constructs frames builds them recursively. The frame theory I propose borrows heavily from previous frame theories, although its collection of representational components is somewhat unique. Furthermore, frame theorists generally assume that frames are rigid configurations of independent attributes, whereas I propose that frames are dynamic relational structures whose form is flexible and context dependent. In the third section, I illustrate how frames support a wide variety of representational tasks central to conceptual processing in natural and artificial intelligence. Frames can represent exemplars and propositions, prototypes and membership, subordinates and taxonomies. Frames can also represent conceptual combinations, event sequences, rules, and plans. In the fourth section, I show how frames define the extent of conceptual fields and how they provide a powerful productive mechanism for generating specific concepts within a field.
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Concept and definition theory (1989) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Bühl, W.L.: ¬Das Konzil der Lexikographen (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  11. Hahn, A.: Begriffe, Konzeptionen und Beispiele (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  12. Kerber, H.: Begriffskultur als Ordnung? (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  13. Kleinknecht, H.: ¬Eine analytische Begriffstheorie? (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  14. Patzak, M.: Begriffsklärung als ein metatheoretisches Problem (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  15. Popp, R.: Puritanismus der Erkenntnis (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3933)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  16. Suchanek, A.: Zur Problemkultur in den Sozialwissenschaften (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3938)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  17. Walther-Klaus, E.: ¬Die Problematik wissenschaftlicher Definitionen (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  18. Weiss, H.: Ordnung als Wissen? (1996) 0.02 
    0.024996921 = product of:
  0.049993843 = sum of:
    0.049993843 = product of:
      0.099987686 = sum of:
        0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 3940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099987686 = score(doc=3940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 3940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
  19. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.02 
    0.02164797 = product of:
  0.04329594 = sum of:
    0.04329594 = product of:
      0.08659188 = sum of:
        0.08659188 = weight(_text_:i in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08659188 = score(doc=1077,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.5052476 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffs- und Definitionstheorie in ihrem Zusammenhang (1985) 0.02 
    0.021425933 = product of:
  0.042851865 = sum of:
    0.042851865 = product of:
      0.08570373 = sum of:
        0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08570373 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045439374 = queryNorm
            0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 47
  • e 13
  • m 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 57
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications