Search (502 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.041232985 = product of:
      0.061849475 = sum of:
        0.05195844 = sum of:
          0.030835807 = weight(_text_:k in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030835807 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.021122636 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021122636 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.009891033 = product of:
          0.029673098 = sum of:
            0.029673098 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029673098 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12782377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  2. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.03
    0.031474452 = product of:
      0.047211677 = sum of:
        0.0074679796 = product of:
          0.014935959 = sum of:
            0.014935959 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014935959 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0397437 = product of:
          0.05961555 = sum of:
            0.029942451 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029942451 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
            0.029673098 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029673098 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12782377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  3. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.03
    0.03091177 = product of:
      0.092735305 = sum of:
        0.092735305 = product of:
          0.13910295 = sum of:
            0.06986572 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06986572 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.06923723 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06923723 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12782377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  4. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.03
    0.028253358 = product of:
      0.042380035 = sum of:
        0.029072277 = product of:
          0.058144554 = sum of:
            0.058144554 = weight(_text_:k in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058144554 = score(doc=5066,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013307756 = product of:
          0.039923266 = sum of:
            0.039923266 = weight(_text_:29 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039923266 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
    Source
    Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
  5. Khurshid, A.; Sahai, H.: Bibliometric, scientometric and informetric distributions and laws : a selected bibliography (1991) 0.03
    0.027142575 = product of:
      0.04071386 = sum of:
        0.017425286 = product of:
          0.03485057 = sum of:
            0.03485057 = weight(_text_:h in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03485057 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.023288574 = product of:
          0.06986572 = sum of:
            0.06986572 = weight(_text_:29 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06986572 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991) no.2, S.18-29
  6. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.03
    0.026019722 = product of:
      0.07805917 = sum of:
        0.07805917 = sum of:
          0.058144554 = weight(_text_:k in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058144554 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
          0.019914614 = weight(_text_:h in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019914614 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The article by K. Järvelin & O. Persson published in JASIST 59(9), The DCI-Index: Discounted Cumulated Impact-Based Research Evaluation, (pp. 1433-1440) contains an unfortunate error in one of its formulas, Equation 3. The present paper gives the correction and an example of impact analysis based on the corrected formula.
    Object
    h-index
  7. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.03
    0.02542876 = product of:
      0.07628628 = sum of:
        0.07628628 = sum of:
          0.05139301 = weight(_text_:k in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05139301 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
          0.024893267 = weight(_text_:h in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024893267 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  8. Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017) 0.03
    0.02542876 = product of:
      0.07628628 = sum of:
        0.07628628 = sum of:
          0.05139301 = weight(_text_:k in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05139301 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
          0.024893267 = weight(_text_:h in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024893267 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.208-214
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.02
    0.024721688 = product of:
      0.03708253 = sum of:
        0.025438242 = product of:
          0.050876483 = sum of:
            0.050876483 = weight(_text_:k in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050876483 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011644287 = product of:
          0.03493286 = sum of:
            0.03493286 = weight(_text_:29 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03493286 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Classification
    BCGS (FH K)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 19:02:46
    GHBS
    BCGS (FH K)
  10. Chang, K.-C.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, C,-C.: Threshold effects of the patent H-index in the relationship between patent citations and market value (2015) 0.02
    0.022473764 = product of:
      0.06742129 = sum of:
        0.06742129 = sum of:
          0.030835807 = weight(_text_:k in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030835807 = score(doc=2344,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
          0.03658548 = weight(_text_:h in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03658548 = score(doc=2344,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.40342426 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study employs a panel threshold regression model to test whether the patent h-index has a threshold effect on the relationship between patent citations and market value in the pharmaceutical industry. It aims to bridge the gap in extant research on this topic. This study demonstrates that the patent h-index has a triple threshold effect on the relationship between patent citations and market value. When the patent h-index is less than or equal to the lowest threshold, 4, there is a positive relationship between patent citations and market value. This study indicates that the first regime (where the patent h-index is less than or equal to 4) is optimal, because this is where the extent of the positive relationship between patent citations and market value is the greatest.
    Object
    h-index
  11. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.02
    0.020369545 = product of:
      0.030554317 = sum of:
        0.017246561 = product of:
          0.034493122 = sum of:
            0.034493122 = weight(_text_:h in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034493122 = score(doc=3313,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013307756 = product of:
          0.039923266 = sum of:
            0.039923266 = weight(_text_:29 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039923266 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The g-index is discussed in terms of the average number of citations of the publications in the g-core, showing that it combines features of the h-index and the A-index in one number. For a visualization, data of 8 famous physicists are presented and analyzed. In comparison with the h-index, the g-index increases between 67% and 144%, on average by a factor of 2.
    Date
    4. 2.2010 20:56:29
    Object
    h-index
  12. Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014) 0.02
    0.020369545 = product of:
      0.030554317 = sum of:
        0.017246561 = product of:
          0.034493122 = sum of:
            0.034493122 = weight(_text_:h in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034493122 = score(doc=1207,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013307756 = product of:
          0.039923266 = sum of:
            0.039923266 = weight(_text_:29 in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039923266 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:53:38
    Object
    h-index
  13. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.02
    0.0197663 = product of:
      0.029649451 = sum of:
        0.019758418 = product of:
          0.039516836 = sum of:
            0.039516836 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039516836 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009891033 = product of:
          0.029673098 = sum of:
            0.029673098 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029673098 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12782377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  14. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.02
    0.019754563 = product of:
      0.029631842 = sum of:
        0.017987555 = product of:
          0.03597511 = sum of:
            0.03597511 = weight(_text_:k in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597511 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011644287 = product of:
          0.03493286 = sum of:
            0.03493286 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03493286 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    23. 8.2002 11:51:29
  15. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.02
    0.019754563 = product of:
      0.029631842 = sum of:
        0.017987555 = product of:
          0.03597511 = sum of:
            0.03597511 = weight(_text_:k in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597511 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011644287 = product of:
          0.03493286 = sum of:
            0.03493286 = weight(_text_:29 in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03493286 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 9:42:14
  16. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.02
    0.019754563 = product of:
      0.029631842 = sum of:
        0.017987555 = product of:
          0.03597511 = sum of:
            0.03597511 = weight(_text_:k in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597511 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011644287 = product of:
          0.03493286 = sum of:
            0.03493286 = weight(_text_:29 in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03493286 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  17. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie : quo vadis? (2017) 0.02
    0.019754563 = product of:
      0.029631842 = sum of:
        0.017987555 = product of:
          0.03597511 = sum of:
            0.03597511 = weight(_text_:k in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597511 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011644287 = product of:
          0.03493286 = sum of:
            0.03493286 = weight(_text_:29 in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03493286 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  18. Möller, T.: Woher stammt das Wissen über die Halbwertzeiten des Wissens? (2017) 0.02
    0.019754563 = product of:
      0.029631842 = sum of:
        0.017987555 = product of:
          0.03597511 = sum of:
            0.03597511 = weight(_text_:k in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03597511 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011644287 = product of:
          0.03493286 = sum of:
            0.03493286 = weight(_text_:29 in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03493286 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1284026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036501996 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  19. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.02
    0.019514792 = product of:
      0.05854437 = sum of:
        0.05854437 = sum of:
          0.043608412 = weight(_text_:k in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043608412 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
          0.014935959 = weight(_text_:h in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014935959 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Classification
    BAHU (FH K)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
    GHBS
    BAHU (FH K)
  20. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.02
    0.019299518 = product of:
      0.05789855 = sum of:
        0.05789855 = sum of:
          0.03634035 = weight(_text_:k in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03634035 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13030402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
          0.021558201 = weight(_text_:h in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021558201 = score(doc=2694,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.09068736 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036501996 = queryNorm
              0.23772003 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research evaluation is increasingly popular and important among research funding bodies and science policy makers. Various indicators have been proposed to evaluate the standing of individual scientists, institutions, journals, or countries. A simple and popular one among the indicators is the h-index, the Hirsch index (Hirsch 2005), which is an indicator for lifetime achievement of a scholar. Several other indicators have been proposed to complement or balance the h-index. However, these indicators have no conception of aging. The AR-index (Jin et al. 2007) incorporates aging but divides the received citation counts by the raw age of the publication. Consequently, the decay of a publication is very steep and insensitive to disciplinary differences. In addition, we believe that a publication becomes outdated only when it is no longer cited, not because of its age. Finally, all indicators treat citations as equally material when one might reasonably think that a citation from a heavily cited publication should weigh more than a citation froma non-cited or little-cited publication.We propose a new indicator, the Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index, which devalues old citations in a smooth way. It rewards an author for receiving new citations even if the publication is old. Further, it allows weighting of the citations by the citation weight of the citing publication. DCI can be used to calculate research performance on the basis of the h-core of a scholar or any other publication data.
    Content
    Erratum in: Järvelin, K., O. Persson: The DCI-index: discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Erratum re. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352.

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 485
  • el 11
  • m 9
  • s 5
  • r 3
  • b 1
  • More… Less…