Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.02
    0.018437643 = product of:
      0.036875285 = sum of:
        0.036875285 = product of:
          0.07375057 = sum of:
            0.07375057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07375057 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  2. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02
    0.015364703 = product of:
      0.030729406 = sum of:
        0.030729406 = product of:
          0.06145881 = sum of:
            0.06145881 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06145881 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  3. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.01
    0.0139334975 = product of:
      0.027866995 = sum of:
        0.027866995 = product of:
          0.05573399 = sum of:
            0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05573399 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'04). Eds. D. Plexousakis and F. van Harmelen
  4. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01
    0.0069667487 = product of:
      0.0139334975 = sum of:
        0.0139334975 = product of:
          0.027866995 = sum of:
            0.027866995 = weight(_text_:f in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027866995 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.15412995 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool