Search (54 results, page 1 of 3)

0.0705394 = product of:
  0.1410788 = sum of:
    0.1410788 = sum of:
      0.07961999 = weight(_text_:f in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07961999 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.06145881 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06145881 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

13.12.2017 14:17:22

0.04937758 = product of:
  0.09875516 = sum of:
    0.09875516 = sum of:
      0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05573399 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.04302117 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04302117 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.043514617 = product of:
  0.08702923 = sum of:
    0.08702923 = sum of:
      0.05629983 = weight(_text_:f in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05629983 = score(doc=2589,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
      0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030729406 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose Ontologies are used to formally describe the concepts within a domain in a machine-understandable way. Matching of heterogeneous ontologies is often essential for many applications like semantic annotation, query answering or ontology integration. Some ontologies may include a large number of entities which make the ontology matching process very complex in terms of the search space and execution time requirements. The purpose of this paper is to present a technique for finding degree of similarity between ontologies that trims down the search space by eliminating the ontology concepts that have less likelihood of being matched. Design/methodology/approach Algorithms are written for finding key concepts, concept matching and relationship matching. WordNet is used for solving synonym problems during the matching process. The technique is evaluated using the reference alignments between ontologies from ontology alignment evaluation initiative benchmark in terms of degree of similarity, Pearson's correlation coefficient and IR measures precision, recall and F-measure. Findings Positive correlation between the degree of similarity and degree of similarity (reference alignment) and computed values of precision, recall and F-measure showed that if only key concepts of ontologies are compared, a time and search space efficient ontology matching system can be developed. Originality/value On the basis of the present novel approach for ontology matching, it is concluded that using key concepts for ontology matching gives comparable results in reduced time and space.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0352697 = product of:
  0.0705394 = sum of:
    0.0705394 = sum of:
      0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039809994 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030729406 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04536168 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16.11.2018 14:22:01

0.027017388 = product of:
  0.054034777 = sum of:
    0.054034777 = product of:
      0.21613911 = sum of:
        0.21613911 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21613911 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38457683 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.018011594 = product of:
  0.03602319 = sum of:
    0.03602319 = product of:
      0.14409275 = sum of:
        0.14409275 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14409275 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38457683 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.017238233 = product of:
  0.034476466 = sum of:
    0.034476466 = product of:
      0.06895293 = sum of:
        0.06895293 = weight(_text_:f in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06895293 = score(doc=4705,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.38137275 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Companies, governmental agencies and scientists produce a large amount of quantitative (research) data, consisting of measurements ranging from e.g. the surface temperatures of an ocean to the viscosity of a sample of mayonnaise. Such measurements are stored in tables in e.g. spreadsheet files and research reports. To integrate and reuse such data, it is necessary to have a semantic description of the data. However, the notation used is often ambiguous, making automatic interpretation and conversion to RDF or other suitable format diffiult. For example, the table header cell "f(Hz)" refers to frequency measured in Hertz, but the symbol "f" can also refer to the unit farad or the quantities force or luminous flux. Current annotation tools for this task either work on less ambiguous data or perform a more limited task. We introduce new disambiguation strategies based on an ontology, which allows to improve performance on "sloppy" datasets not yet targeted by existing systems.

Source

The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al

0.015923997 = product of:
  0.031847995 = sum of:
    0.031847995 = product of:
      0.06369599 = sum of:
        0.06369599 = weight(_text_:f in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06369599 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.015923997 = product of:
  0.031847995 = sum of:
    0.031847995 = product of:
      0.06369599 = sum of:
        0.06369599 = weight(_text_:f in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06369599 = score(doc=4773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.015364703 = product of:
  0.030729406 = sum of:
    0.030729406 = product of:
      0.06145881 = sum of:
        0.06145881 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06145881 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27

0.014074958 = product of:
  0.028149916 = sum of:
    0.028149916 = product of:
      0.05629983 = sum of:
        0.05629983 = weight(_text_:f in 3936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05629983 = score(doc=3936,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3936, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0139334975 = product of:
  0.027866995 = sum of:
    0.027866995 = product of:
      0.05573399 = sum of:
        0.05573399 = weight(_text_:f in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05573399 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.013790587 = product of:
  0.027581174 = sum of:
    0.027581174 = product of:
      0.055162348 = sum of:
        0.055162348 = weight(_text_:f in 3949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055162348 = score(doc=3949,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.3050982 = fieldWeight in 3949, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - The object of this study is to develop methods for automatically annotating the argumentative role of sentences in scientific abstracts. Working from Medline abstracts, sentences were classified into four major argumentative roles: objective, method, result, and conclusion. The idea is that, if the role of each sentence can be marked up, then these metadata can be used during information retrieval to seek particular types of information such as novelty, conclusions, methodologies, aims/goals of a scientific piece of work. Design/methodology/approach - Two approaches were tested: linguistic cues and positional heuristics. Linguistic cues are lexico-syntactic patterns modelled as regular expressions implemented in a linguistic parser. Positional heuristics make use of the relative position of a sentence in the abstract to deduce its argumentative class. Findings - The experiments showed that positional heuristics attained a much higher degree of accuracy on Medline abstracts with an F-score of 64 per cent, whereas the linguistic cues only attained an F-score of 12 per cent. This is mostly because sentences from different argumentative roles are not always announced by surface linguistic cues. Research limitations/implications - A limitation to the study was the inability to test other methods to perform this task such as machine learning techniques which have been reported to perform better on Medline abstracts. Also, to compare the results of the study with earlier studies using Medline abstracts, the different argumentative roles present in Medline had to be mapped on to four major argumentative roles. This may have favourably biased the performance of the sentence classification by positional heuristics. Originality/value - To the best of one's knowledge, this study presents the first instance of evaluating linguistic cues and positional heuristics on the same corpus.

0.013037384 = product of:
  0.026074767 = sum of:
    0.026074767 = product of:
      0.052149534 = sum of:
        0.052149534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052149534 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper describes a state-of-the-art supervised, knowledge-intensive approach to the automatic identification of semantic relations between nominals in English sentences. The system employs a combination of rich and varied sets of new and previously used lexical, syntactic, and semantic features extracted from various knowledge sources such as WordNet and additional annotated corpora. The system ranked first at the third most popular SemEval 2007 Task - Classification of Semantic Relations between Nominals and achieved an F-measure of 72.4% and an accuracy of 76.3%. We also show that some semantic relations are better suited for WordNet-based models than other relations. Additionally, we make a distinction between out-of-context (regular) examples and those that require sentence context for relation identification and show that contextual data are important for the performance of a noun-noun semantic parser. Finally, learning curves show that the task difficulty varies across relations and that our learned WordNet-based representation is highly accurate so the performance results suggest the upper bound on what this representation can do.

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=1572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.011942998 = product of:
  0.023885995 = sum of:
    0.023885995 = product of:
      0.04777199 = sum of:
        0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04777199 = score(doc=3379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04536168 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Domain Ontology learning has been introduced as a technology that aims at reducing the bottleneck of knowledge acquisition in the construction of domain ontologies. However, the discovery and the labelling of non-taxonomic relations have been identified as one of the most difficult problems in this learning process. In this paper, we propose OntologyLine, a new system for discovering non-taxonomic relations and building domain ontology from scratch. The proposed system is based on adapting Open Information Extraction algorithms to extract and label relations between domain concepts. OntologyLine was tested in two different domains: the financial and cancer domains. It was evaluated against gold standard ontology and was compared to state-of-the-art ontology learning algorithm. The experimental results show that OntologyLine is more effective for acquiring non-taxonomic relations and gives better results in terms of precision, recall and F-measure.