Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wolfram, D."
  1. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.: Visualization of term discrimination analysis (2001) 0.02
    0.02494381 = product of:
      0.04988762 = sum of:
        0.04988762 = product of:
          0.09977524 = sum of:
            0.09977524 = weight(_text_:y in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09977524 = score(doc=5210,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Zang and Wolfram compute the discrimination value for terms as the difference between the centroid value of all terms in the corpus and that value without the term in question, and suggest selection be made by comparing density changes with a visualization tool. The Distance Angle Retrieval Environment (DARE) visually projects a document or term space by presenting distance similarity on the X axis and angular similarity on the Y axis. Thus a document icon appearing close to the X axis would be relevant to reference points in terms of a distance similarity measure, while those close to the Y axis are relevant to reference points in terms of an angle based measure. Using 450 Associated Press news reports indexed by 44 distinct terms, the removal of the term ``Yeltsin'' causes the cluster to fall on the Y axis indicating a good discriminator. For an angular measure, cosine say, movement along the X axis to the left will signal good discrimination, as movement to the right will signal poor discrimination. A term density space could also be used. Most terms are shown to be indifferent discriminators. Different measures result in different choices as good and poor discriminators, as does the use of a term space rather than a document space. The visualization approach is clearly feasible, and provides some additional insights not found in the computation of a discrimination value.
  2. Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wolfram, D.; Ma, F.: Public health and social media : a study of Zika virus-related posts on Yahoo! Answers (2020) 0.02
    0.020366535 = product of:
      0.04073307 = sum of:
        0.04073307 = product of:
          0.08146614 = sum of:
            0.08146614 = weight(_text_:y in 5672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08146614 = score(doc=5672,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 5672, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.; Wang, P.; Hong, Y.; Gillis, R.: Visualization of health-subject analysis based on query term co-occurrences (2008) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Dimitroff, A.; Wolfram, D.: Searcher response in a hypertext-based bibliographic information retrieval system (1995) 0.01
    0.012200809 = product of:
      0.024401618 = sum of:
        0.024401618 = product of:
          0.048803236 = sum of:
            0.048803236 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048803236 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.22-29
  5. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.01
    0.009150607 = product of:
      0.018301213 = sum of:
        0.018301213 = product of:
          0.036602426 = sum of:
            0.036602426 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036602426 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  6. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.01
    0.007625506 = product of:
      0.015251012 = sum of:
        0.015251012 = product of:
          0.030502023 = sum of:
            0.030502023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030502023 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22