Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.; Cahn, P.: TARGET & FREESTYLE : DIALOG and Mead join the relevance ranks (1994) 0.03
    0.03402563 = product of:
      0.06805126 = sum of:
        0.06805126 = product of:
          0.10207689 = sum of:
            0.010364074 = weight(_text_:e in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010364074 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
            0.09171282 = weight(_text_:p in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09171282 = score(doc=2777,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.5617989 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.446-456.
    Language
    e
  2. Wang, P.; Hawk, W.B.; Tenopir, C.: Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources : an exploratory study using a holistic approach (2000) 0.03
    0.030085932 = product of:
      0.060171865 = sum of:
        0.060171865 = product of:
          0.09025779 = sum of:
            0.012436888 = weight(_text_:e in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012436888 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
            0.077820905 = weight(_text_:p in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077820905 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  3. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.02
    0.022717312 = product of:
      0.045434624 = sum of:
        0.045434624 = product of:
          0.068151936 = sum of:
            0.0072548515 = weight(_text_:e in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0072548515 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
            0.060897082 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060897082 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  4. Tenopir, C.; Jascó, P.: Quality of abstracts (1993) 0.02
    0.020057287 = product of:
      0.040114574 = sum of:
        0.040114574 = product of:
          0.06017186 = sum of:
            0.008291259 = weight(_text_:e in 5026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008291259 = score(doc=5026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 5026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5026)
            0.0518806 = weight(_text_:p in 5026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0518806 = score(doc=5026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 5026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5026)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  5. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.02
    0.019167844 = product of:
      0.03833569 = sum of:
        0.03833569 = product of:
          0.057503533 = sum of:
            0.008291259 = weight(_text_:e in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008291259 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
            0.049212273 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049212273 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
    Language
    e
  6. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.02
    0.019167844 = product of:
      0.03833569 = sum of:
        0.03833569 = product of:
          0.057503533 = sum of:
            0.008291259 = weight(_text_:e in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008291259 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
            0.049212273 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049212273 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
    Language
    e
  7. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.02
    0.017012816 = product of:
      0.03402563 = sum of:
        0.03402563 = product of:
          0.051038444 = sum of:
            0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005182037 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
            0.04585641 = weight(_text_:p in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04585641 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.02
    0.016771864 = product of:
      0.03354373 = sum of:
        0.03354373 = product of:
          0.05031559 = sum of:
            0.0072548515 = weight(_text_:e in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0072548515 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
            0.04306074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04306074 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  9. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Boyce, P.; Grayson, M.; Paulson, K.-L.: Relying an electronic journals : reading patterns of astronomers (2005) 0.02
    0.015901554 = product of:
      0.03180311 = sum of:
        0.03180311 = product of:
          0.04770466 = sum of:
            0.008794209 = weight(_text_:e in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008794209 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
            0.038910452 = weight(_text_:p in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038910452 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys of the members of the American Astronomical Society identify how astronomers use journals and what features and formats they prefer. While every work field is distinct, the patterns of use by astronomers may provide a glimpse of what to expect of journal patterns and use by other scientists. Astronomers, like other scientists, continue to invest a large amount of their time in reading articles and place a high level of importance an journal articles. They use a wide variety of formats and means to get access to materials that are essential to their work in teaching, service, and research. They select access means that are convenient-whether those means be print, electronic, or both. The availability of a mature electronic journals system from their primary professional society has surely influenced their early adoption of e-journals.
    Language
    e
  10. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.01
    0.013251295 = product of:
      0.02650259 = sum of:
        0.02650259 = product of:
          0.039753884 = sum of:
            0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007328507 = score(doc=214,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
            0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032425378 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
    Language
    e
  11. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008) 0.01
    0.013251295 = product of:
      0.02650259 = sum of:
        0.02650259 = product of:
          0.039753884 = sum of:
            0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007328507 = score(doc=1911,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
            0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032425378 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
    Language
    e
  12. Tenopir, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Simmons, B.; Pollard, R.: Academic users' interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks : affective and cognitive behaviors (2008) 0.01
    0.013251295 = product of:
      0.02650259 = sum of:
        0.02650259 = product of:
          0.039753884 = sum of:
            0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007328507 = score(doc=2027,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
            0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032425378 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents part of phase 2 of a research project funded by the NSF-National Science Digital Library Project, which observed how academic users interact with the ScienceDirect information retrieval system for simulated class-related assignments. The ultimate goal of the project is twofold: (1) to find ways to improve science and engineering students' use of science e-journal systems; (2) to develop methods to measure user interaction behaviors. Process-tracing technique recorded participants' processes and interaction behaviors that are measurable; think-aloud protocol captured participants' affective and cognitive verbalizations; pre- and post-search questionnaires solicited demographic information, prior experience with the system, and comments. We explored possible relationships between affective feelings and cognitive behaviors. During search interactions both feelings and thoughts occurred frequently. Positive feelings were more common and were associated more often with thoughts about results. Negative feelings were associated more often with thoughts related to the system, search strategy, and task. Learning styles are also examined as a factor influencing behavior. Engineering graduate students with an assimilating learning style searched longer and paused less than those with a converging learning style. Further exploration of learning styles is suggested.
    Language
    e
  13. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals : case study OhioLINK (2006) 0.01
    0.012535806 = product of:
      0.025071612 = sum of:
        0.025071612 = product of:
          0.037607417 = sum of:
            0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005182037 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
            0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032425378 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.01
    0.011979903 = product of:
      0.023959806 = sum of:
        0.023959806 = product of:
          0.03593971 = sum of:
            0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005182037 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
            0.030757671 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030757671 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37
    Language
    e
  15. Tenopir, C.: Full text database retrieval performance (1985) 0.00
    0.0034546915 = product of:
      0.006909383 = sum of:
        0.006909383 = product of:
          0.020728149 = sum of:
            0.020728149 = weight(_text_:e in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020728149 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.31761688 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.00
    0.00341997 = product of:
      0.00683994 = sum of:
        0.00683994 = product of:
          0.02051982 = sum of:
            0.02051982 = weight(_text_:e in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02051982 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.31442466 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
    Language
    e
  17. Tenopir, C.; Read, E.: Patterns of database use in academic libraries (2000) 0.00
    0.00341997 = product of:
      0.00683994 = sum of:
        0.00683994 = product of:
          0.02051982 = sum of:
            0.02051982 = weight(_text_:e in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02051982 = score(doc=6869,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.31442466 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Tenopir, C.: Full text databases (1984) 0.00
    0.0027637533 = product of:
      0.0055275066 = sum of:
        0.0055275066 = product of:
          0.016582519 = sum of:
            0.016582519 = weight(_text_:e in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016582519 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Tenopir, C.: ¬The user-system interface (1989) 0.00
    0.0027637533 = product of:
      0.0055275066 = sum of:
        0.0055275066 = product of:
          0.016582519 = sum of:
            0.016582519 = weight(_text_:e in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016582519 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Tenopir, C.: Searching by controlled vocabulary or free text (1987) 0.00
    0.0027637533 = product of:
      0.0055275066 = sum of:
        0.0055275066 = product of:
          0.016582519 = sum of:
            0.016582519 = weight(_text_:e in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016582519 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0454034 = queryNorm
                0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e