-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.03
0.025020916 = product of:
0.050041832 = sum of:
0.050041832 = product of:
0.075062744 = sum of:
0.03852201 = weight(_text_:p in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03852201 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.036540736 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036540736 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.02
0.020850763 = product of:
0.041701525 = sum of:
0.041701525 = product of:
0.06255229 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.030450614 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030450614 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.02
0.020850763 = product of:
0.041701525 = sum of:
0.041701525 = product of:
0.06255229 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.030450614 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030450614 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.008120164 = product of:
0.016240329 = sum of:
0.016240329 = product of:
0.048720982 = sum of:
0.048720982 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048720982 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Wouters, P.; Fry, J.: Information-centered research for large-scale analyses of new information sources (2008)
0.01
0.0074903904 = product of:
0.014980781 = sum of:
0.014980781 = product of:
0.04494234 = sum of:
0.04494234 = weight(_text_:p in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04494234 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.0071772784 = product of:
0.014354557 = sum of:
0.014354557 = product of:
0.04306367 = sum of:
0.04306367 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04306367 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Macaluso, B.; Milojevi´c, S.; Cronin, B.; Thelwall, M.: arXiv E-prints and the journal of record : an analysis of roles and relationships (2014)
0.01
0.0069639916 = product of:
0.013927983 = sum of:
0.013927983 = product of:
0.041783947 = sum of:
0.041783947 = weight(_text_:c in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041783947 = score(doc=1285,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS), this article investigates (a) the proportion of papers across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers that are in the WoS, (b) the elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics, and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers-both published and unpublished-have lower citation rates than published papers, although there is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of published and unpublished papers.
-
Thelwall, M.: Assessing web search engines : a webometric approach (2011)
0.01
0.006420335 = product of:
0.01284067 = sum of:
0.01284067 = product of:
0.03852201 = sum of:
0.03852201 = weight(_text_:p in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03852201 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
-
Thelwall, M.: Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles : an analysis of 45 fields (2016)
0.01
0.006420335 = product of:
0.01284067 = sum of:
0.01284067 = product of:
0.03852201 = sum of:
0.03852201 = weight(_text_:p in 3055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03852201 = score(doc=3055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3055)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Wilson, P.
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.01
0.0060901227 = product of:
0.0121802455 = sum of:
0.0121802455 = product of:
0.036540736 = sum of:
0.036540736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036540736 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.0060901227 = product of:
0.0121802455 = sum of:
0.0121802455 = product of:
0.036540736 = sum of:
0.036540736 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036540736 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.0060901227 = product of:
0.0121802455 = sum of:
0.0121802455 = product of:
0.036540736 = sum of:
0.036540736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036540736 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Shifman, L.; Thelwall, M.: Assessing global diffusion with Web memetics : the spread and evolution of a popular joke (2009)
0.01
0.0059091426 = product of:
0.011818285 = sum of:
0.011818285 = product of:
0.035454854 = sum of:
0.035454854 = weight(_text_:c in 3303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035454854 = score(doc=3303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3303)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Memes are small units of culture, analogous to genes, which flow from person to person by copying or imitation. More than any previous medium, the Internet has the technical capabilities for global meme diffusion. Yet, to spread globally, memes need to negotiate their way through cultural and linguistic borders. This article introduces a new broad method, Web memetics, comprising extensive Web searches and combined quantitative and qualitative analyses, to identify and assess: (a) the different versions of a meme, (b) its evolution online, and (c) its Web presence and translation into common Internet languages. This method is demonstrated through one extensively circulated joke about men, women, and computers. The results show that the joke has mutated into several different versions and is widely translated, and that translations incorporate small, local adaptations while retaining the English versions' fundamental components. In conclusion, Web memetics has demonstrated its ability to identify and track the evolution and spread of memes online, with interesting results, albeit for only one case study.
-
Thelwall, M.; Klitkou, A.; Verbeek, A.; Stuart, D.; Vincent, C.: Policy-relevant Webometrics for individual scientific fields (2010)
0.01
0.0059091426 = product of:
0.011818285 = sum of:
0.011818285 = product of:
0.035454854 = sum of:
0.035454854 = weight(_text_:c in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035454854 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: ¬A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations (2011)
0.01
0.0053502796 = product of:
0.010700559 = sum of:
0.010700559 = product of:
0.032101676 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Vis, F.: Commenting on YouTube videos : From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang (2012)
0.01
0.0053502796 = product of:
0.010700559 = sum of:
0.010700559 = product of:
0.032101676 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Wilson, P.: Does research with statistics have more impact? : the citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling (2016)
0.01
0.0053502796 = product of:
0.010700559 = sum of:
0.010700559 = product of:
0.032101676 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Do new research issues attract more citations? : a comparison between 25 Scopus subject categories (2021)
0.01
0.0053502796 = product of:
0.010700559 = sum of:
0.010700559 = product of:
0.032101676 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? : evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 (2023)
0.01
0.0053502796 = product of:
0.010700559 = sum of:
0.010700559 = product of:
0.032101676 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023)
0.01
0.0053502796 = product of:
0.010700559 = sum of:
0.010700559 = product of:
0.032101676 = sum of:
0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032101676 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.044950135 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
