Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Sacherschließung"
  1. From classification to 'knowledge organization' : Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997) (1997) 0.02 
    0.02054913 = product of:
  0.04109826 = sum of:
    0.04109826 = product of:
      0.061647385 = sum of:
        0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032101676 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
        0.02954571 = weight(_text_:c in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02954571 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. den Wiederabdruck der folgenden Beiträge: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (Memorandum of the Classification Research Group, 1955); COATES, E.J.: Classification in information retrieval: the twenty years following Dorking (1978); VICKERY, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1971); VICKERY, B.C.: Knowledge representation: a brief review (1986); LEWSI, D.D. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1996); CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of indexing language devices (1963); SOERGEL, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance: the logical evidence (1994); SPARCK JONES, K.: Reflections on TREC (1995); KEREN, C.: On information science (1984); SALTON, G.: A note about information science research (1985); SVENONIUS, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986); MILSTEAD, J.L.: Needs for research in indexing (1994); WEINER, M.L. u. E.D. LIDDY: Intelligent text processing, and intelligence tradecraft (1995); ZORN, P. et al.: Advanced searching: tricks of the trade (1996); CROFT, W.B.: What do people want from information retrieval? (1995)
  2. Heuvel, C. van den; Rayward, W.B.: Facing interfaces : Paul Otlet's visualizations of data integration (2011) 0.02 
    0.02054913 = product of:
  0.04109826 = sum of:
    0.04109826 = product of:
      0.061647385 = sum of:
        0.032101676 = weight(_text_:p in 4935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032101676 = score(doc=4935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4935)
        0.02954571 = weight(_text_:c in 4935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02954571 = score(doc=4935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4935)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Biographed
    Otlet, P.
  3. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.02 
    0.020226464 = product of:
  0.040452927 = sum of:
    0.040452927 = product of:
      0.06067939 = sum of:
        0.0363189 = weight(_text_:p in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0363189 = score(doc=3624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
        0.024360491 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024360491 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
  4. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.02 
    0.017848182 = product of:
  0.035696365 = sum of:
    0.035696365 = product of:
      0.14278546 = sum of:
        0.14278546 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14278546 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38108775 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  5. Weber, C.: ¬Die Realkataloge der preussischen Universitätsbibliotheken (1930) 0.02 
    0.015757713 = product of:
  0.031515427 = sum of:
    0.031515427 = product of:
      0.09454627 = sum of:
        0.09454627 = weight(_text_:c in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09454627 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. LaFontaine, H.; Otlet, P.: ¬Die Schaffung einer Universalbibliographie (1978) 0.01 
    0.014980781 = product of:
  0.029961562 = sum of:
    0.029961562 = product of:
      0.08988468 = sum of:
        0.08988468 = weight(_text_:p in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08988468 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Kittel, P.: Sachkatalogisierung und Sachkataloge der Druckschriften an der Deutschen Staatsbibliothek : 1945-1990 (1993) 0.01 
    0.014980781 = product of:
  0.029961562 = sum of:
    0.029961562 = product of:
      0.08988468 = sum of:
        0.08988468 = weight(_text_:p in 6906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08988468 = score(doc=6906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 6906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6906)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995) 0.01 
    0.0121802455 = product of:
  0.024360491 = sum of:
    0.024360491 = product of:
      0.07308147 = sum of:
        0.07308147 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07308147 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22
  9. Lorenz, B.: Bibliotheksklassifikation als Spiegel der Wissenschaftsentwicklung : Beobachtungen zu einem Spannungsverhältnis (1997) 0.01 
    0.011818285 = product of:
  0.02363657 = sum of:
    0.02363657 = product of:
      0.07090971 = sum of:
        0.07090971 = weight(_text_:c in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07090971 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Fachschrifttum, Bibliothek und Naturwissenschaft im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Hrsg.: C. Meinel
  10. Otlet, P.: Traité de documentation : le livre sur le livre - théorie et pratique (1934) 0.01 
    0.010700559 = product of:
  0.021401118 = sum of:
    0.021401118 = product of:
      0.06420335 = sum of:
        0.06420335 = weight(_text_:p in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06420335 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Lambe, P.: From cataloguers to designers : Paul Otlet, social Impact and a more proactive role for knowledge organisation professionals (2015) 0.01 
    0.010593012 = product of:
  0.021186024 = sum of:
    0.021186024 = product of:
      0.06355807 = sum of:
        0.06355807 = weight(_text_:p in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06355807 = score(doc=2378,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.3932592 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Biographed
    Otlet, P.
  12. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.01 
    0.008120164 = product of:
  0.016240329 = sum of:
    0.016240329 = product of:
      0.048720982 = sum of:
        0.048720982 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048720982 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  13. Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004) 0.01 
    0.008120164 = product of:
  0.016240329 = sum of:
    0.016240329 = product of:
      0.048720982 = sum of:
        0.048720982 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048720982 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:33:51
  14. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.01 
    0.008120164 = product of:
  0.016240329 = sum of:
    0.016240329 = product of:
      0.048720982 = sum of:
        0.048720982 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048720982 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
  15. Runge, S.: Beiträge zur Sachkatalogisierung (1937) 0.01 
    0.007878857 = product of:
  0.015757713 = sum of:
    0.015757713 = product of:
      0.047273137 = sum of:
        0.047273137 = weight(_text_:c in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047273137 = score(doc=3328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: RUNGE, S.: Wege und Möglichkeiten gemeinschaftlicher Sachkatalogisierung; FRAUENDORFER, S. von: Wo liegen die Grenzen für die Aufstellung und Verwendung bibliographischer Einheitssysteme?; RUNGE, S.: Die Deweysche Dezimalklassifikation [DDC] im Vergleich zur Brüsseler Dezimalklassifikation [UDC]; KLEMM, F.: Die Cuttersche Expansive Classification; MOGK, H.: Das System der Kongreßbibliothek in Washington [LCC]; FAASS, B.: Die neuen Fachkataloge des sächsischen Landesbibliothek; NISSEN, C.: Der Mainzer Sachkatalog in Theorie und Praxis; SCHMITZ, W.: Der Katalog "Technik" der Preußischen Staatsbibliothek; RUNGE, S.: Die Bezeichnung im systematischen Katalog
  16. Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013) 0.01 
    0.0071051433 = product of:
  0.014210287 = sum of:
    0.014210287 = product of:
      0.04263086 = sum of:
        0.04263086 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04263086 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15740772 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:10:07
  17. Heuvel, C. van den: ¬The Decimal Office : administration as a science in the Netherlands in the first decades of the twentieth century (2013) 0.01 
    0.006893999 = product of:
  0.013787998 = sum of:
    0.013787998 = product of:
      0.04136399 = sum of:
        0.04136399 = weight(_text_:c in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04136399 = score(doc=5521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15505123 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Atherton Cochrane, P.: Knowledge space revisited : challenges for twenty-first century library and information science researchers (2013) 0.01 
    0.006420335 = product of:
  0.01284067 = sum of:
    0.01284067 = product of:
      0.03852201 = sum of:
        0.03852201 = weight(_text_:p in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03852201 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Pettee, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information (1985) 0.01 
    0.0060531497 = product of:
  0.012106299 = sum of:
    0.012106299 = product of:
      0.0363189 = sum of:
        0.0363189 = weight(_text_:p in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0363189 = score(doc=3630,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
  20. Pettee, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.01 
    0.0060531497 = product of:
  0.012106299 = sum of:
    0.012106299 = product of:
      0.0363189 = sum of:
        0.0363189 = weight(_text_:p in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0363189 = score(doc=3633,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161878 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044950135 = queryNorm
            0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 11
  • f 1

Types

  • a 21
  • m 6
  • s 3
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications