Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Data Mining"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.04
    0.04405364 = product of:
      0.08810728 = sum of:
        0.08810728 = sum of:
          0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05760526 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045026023 = queryNorm
              0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.030502023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030502023 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045026023 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  2. Chen, Y.-L.; Liu, Y.-H.; Ho, W.-L.: ¬A text mining approach to assist the general public in the retrieval of legal documents (2013) 0.02
    0.02443984 = product of:
      0.04887968 = sum of:
        0.04887968 = product of:
          0.09775936 = sum of:
            0.09775936 = weight(_text_:y in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09775936 = score(doc=521,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.45116252 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Song, J.; Huang, Y.; Qi, X.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Fu, K.; Huang, T.: Discovering hierarchical topic evolution in time-stamped documents (2016) 0.02
    0.02443984 = product of:
      0.04887968 = sum of:
        0.04887968 = product of:
          0.09775936 = sum of:
            0.09775936 = weight(_text_:y in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09775936 = score(doc=2853,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.45116252 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Wei, C.-P.; Lee, Y.-H.; Chiang, Y.-S.; Chen, C.-T.; Yang, C.C.C.: Exploiting temporal characteristics of features for effectively discovering event episodes from news corpora (2014) 0.02
    0.020366535 = product of:
      0.04073307 = sum of:
        0.04073307 = product of:
          0.08146614 = sum of:
            0.08146614 = weight(_text_:y in 1225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08146614 = score(doc=1225,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 1225, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010) 0.02
    0.017281577 = product of:
      0.034563154 = sum of:
        0.034563154 = product of:
          0.06912631 = sum of:
            0.06912631 = weight(_text_:y in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912631 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Qiu, X.Y.; Srinivasan, P.; Hu, Y.: Supervised learning models to predict firm performance with annual reports : an empirical study (2014) 0.02
    0.017281577 = product of:
      0.034563154 = sum of:
        0.034563154 = product of:
          0.06912631 = sum of:
            0.06912631 = weight(_text_:y in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912631 = score(doc=1205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Loonus, Y.: Einsatzbereiche der KI und ihre Relevanz für Information Professionals (2017) 0.02
    0.017281577 = product of:
      0.034563154 = sum of:
        0.034563154 = product of:
          0.06912631 = sum of:
            0.06912631 = weight(_text_:y in 5668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912631 = score(doc=5668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 5668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Li, D.; Tang, J.; Ding, Y.; Shuai, X.; Chambers, T.; Sun, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J.: Topic-level opinion influence model (TOIM) : an investigation using tencent microblogging (2015) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Tu, Y.-N.; Hsu, S.-L.: Constructing conceptual trajectory maps to trace the development of research fields (2016) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 3059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=3059,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 3059, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3059)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Varathan, K.D.; Giachanou, A.; Crestani, F.: Comparative opinion mining : a review (2017) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=3540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Opinion mining refers to the use of natural language processing, text analysis, and computational linguistics to identify and extract subjective information in textual material. Opinion mining, also known as sentiment analysis, has received a lot of attention in recent times, as it provides a number of tools to analyze public opinion on a number of different topics. Comparative opinion mining is a subfield of opinion mining which deals with identifying and extracting information that is expressed in a comparative form (e.g., "paper X is better than the Y"). Comparative opinion mining plays a very important role when one tries to evaluate something because it provides a reference point for the comparison. This paper provides a review of the area of comparative opinion mining. It is the first review that cover specifically this topic as all previous reviews dealt mostly with general opinion mining. This survey covers comparative opinion mining from two different angles. One from the perspective of techniques and the other from the perspective of comparative opinion elements. It also incorporates preprocessing tools as well as data set that were used by past researchers that can be useful to future researchers in the field of comparative opinion mining.
  11. Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013) 0.01
    0.007625506 = product of:
      0.015251012 = sum of:
        0.015251012 = product of:
          0.030502023 = sum of:
            0.030502023 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030502023 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:43:01
  12. Fonseca, F.; Marcinkowski, M.; Davis, C.: Cyber-human systems of thought and understanding (2019) 0.01
    0.007625506 = product of:
      0.015251012 = sum of:
        0.015251012 = product of:
          0.030502023 = sum of:
            0.030502023 = weight(_text_:22 in 5011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030502023 = score(doc=5011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 3.2019 16:32:22
  13. Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018) 0.01
    0.0061004045 = product of:
      0.012200809 = sum of:
        0.012200809 = product of:
          0.024401618 = sum of:
            0.024401618 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024401618 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:33:49