-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.06
0.056948222 = product of:
0.113896444 = sum of:
0.113896444 = sum of:
0.041986477 = weight(_text_:g in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041986477 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035412684 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.036497276 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036497276 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.05
0.052322503 = product of:
0.10464501 = sum of:
0.10464501 = product of:
0.1569675 = sum of:
0.08397295 = weight(_text_:g in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08397295 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.07299455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07299455 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Zhang, C.-T.: Relationship of the h-index, g-index, and e-index (2010)
0.05
0.051389456 = product of:
0.10277891 = sum of:
0.10277891 = product of:
0.15416837 = sum of:
0.11875569 = weight(_text_:g in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11875569 = score(doc=3418,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035412684 = score(doc=3418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Of h-type indices available now, the g-index is an important one in that it not only keeps some advantages of the h-index but also counts citations from highly cited articles. However, the g-index has a drawback that one has to add fictitious articles with zero citation to calculate this index in some important cases. Based on an alternative definition without introducing fictitious articles, an analytical method has been proposed to calculate the g-index based approximately on the h-index and the e-index. If citations for a scientist are ranked by a power law, it is shown that the g-index can be calculated accurately by the h-index, the e-index, and the power parameter. The relationship of the h-, g-, and e-indices presented here shows that the g-index contains the citation information from the h-index, the e-index, and some papers beyond the h-core.
- Object
- g-index
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.05
0.04745685 = product of:
0.0949137 = sum of:
0.0949137 = sum of:
0.03498873 = weight(_text_:g in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03498873 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.029510569 = weight(_text_:c in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029510569 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.030414397 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030414397 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005)
0.04
0.03796548 = product of:
0.07593096 = sum of:
0.07593096 = sum of:
0.027990986 = weight(_text_:g in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027990986 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.165991 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.023608455 = weight(_text_:c in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023608455 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.024331518 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024331518 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper we investigate the scattering of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in more than 137,000 document delivery requests submitted to a national document delivery service. We first summarize the major findings of the study with regards to the performance of the service. We then identify the "core" journals from which article requests were satisfied and address the following research questions: (a) Does the distribution of (core) journals conform to the Bradford's Law of Scattering? (b) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and impact factors, journals with high impact factors being used more often than the rest? (c) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being used more often than the rest? (d) What is the median age of use (half-life) of requested articles in general? (e) Do requested articles that appear in core journals get obsolete more slowly? (f) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and journal impact factors, journals with high impact factors being obsolete more slowly? (g) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being obsolete more slowly? Based an the analysis of findings, we found that the distribution of highly and moderately used journal titles conform to Bradford's Law. The median age of use was 8 years for all requested articles. Ninety percent of the articles requested were 21 years of age or younger. Articles that appeared in 168 core journal titles seem to get obsolete slightly more slowly than those of all titles. We observed no statistically significant correlations between the frequency of journal use and ISI journal impact factors, and between the frequency of journal use and ISI- (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA) cited half-lives for the most heavily used 168 core journal titles. There was a weak correlation between usage of journals and ISI-reported total citation counts. No statistically significant relationship was found between median age of use and journal impact factors and between median age of use and total citation counts. There was a weak negative correlation between ISI journal impact factors and cited half-lives of 168 core journals, and a weak correlation between ISI citation halflives and use half-lives of core journals. No correlation was found between cited half-lives of 168 core journals and their corresponding total citation counts as reported by ISI. Findings of the current study are discussed along with those of other studies.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 10:54:22
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.03
0.03439963 = product of:
0.06879926 = sum of:
0.06879926 = product of:
0.103198886 = sum of:
0.05598197 = weight(_text_:g in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05598197 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.04721691 = weight(_text_:c in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721691 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tscherteu, G.; Langreiter, C.: Explorative Netzwerkanalyse im Living Web (2009)
0.03
0.03439963 = product of:
0.06879926 = sum of:
0.06879926 = product of:
0.103198886 = sum of:
0.05598197 = weight(_text_:g in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05598197 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
0.04721691 = weight(_text_:c in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721691 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011)
0.03
0.03439963 = product of:
0.06879926 = sum of:
0.06879926 = product of:
0.103198886 = sum of:
0.05598197 = weight(_text_:g in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05598197 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
0.04721691 = weight(_text_:c in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721691 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The approach based on "thermodynamic" considerations that can quantify research performance using an exergy term defined as X = iC, where i is the impact and C is the number of citations is now extended to cases where fractionalized counting of citations is used instead of integer counting.
-
Reichmann, G.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten zur Steuerung der Ergebnisse einer Forschungsevaluation (2021)
0.03
0.03439963 = product of:
0.06879926 = sum of:
0.06879926 = product of:
0.103198886 = sum of:
0.05598197 = weight(_text_:g in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05598197 = score(doc=5660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
0.04721691 = weight(_text_:c in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721691 = score(doc=5660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.03261128 = product of:
0.06522256 = sum of:
0.06522256 = product of:
0.09783384 = sum of:
0.061336566 = weight(_text_:c in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061336566 = score(doc=1352,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.036497276 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036497276 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.03
0.03195998 = product of:
0.06391996 = sum of:
0.06391996 = product of:
0.09587994 = sum of:
0.04721691 = weight(_text_:c in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721691 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.048663035 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048663035 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
-
Schlögl, C.: Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement (2000)
0.03
0.030099675 = product of:
0.06019935 = sum of:
0.06019935 = product of:
0.090299025 = sum of:
0.048984226 = weight(_text_:g in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048984226 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.041314796 = weight(_text_:c in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041314796 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.03
0.027964985 = product of:
0.05592997 = sum of:
0.05592997 = product of:
0.08389495 = sum of:
0.041314796 = weight(_text_:c in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041314796 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.042580154 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042580154 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.03
0.026161252 = product of:
0.052322503 = sum of:
0.052322503 = product of:
0.07848375 = sum of:
0.041986477 = weight(_text_:g in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041986477 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.036497276 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036497276 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
González-Alcaide, G.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Navarro-Molina, C.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Valderrama-Zurián, J.C.: Library and information science research areas : analysis of journal articles in LISA (2008)
0.03
0.025799721 = product of:
0.051599443 = sum of:
0.051599443 = product of:
0.077399164 = sum of:
0.041986477 = weight(_text_:g in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041986477 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035412684 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Birnholtz, J.; Guha, S.; Gay, G.; Yuan, Y.C.; Heller, C.: Cross-campus collaboration : a scientometric and network case study of publication activity across two campuses of a single institution (2013)
0.03
0.025799721 = product of:
0.051599443 = sum of:
0.051599443 = product of:
0.077399164 = sum of:
0.041986477 = weight(_text_:g in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041986477 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035412684 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schlögl, C.; List, R,: Vergleiche von Zitaten, Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten : am Beispiel von zwei Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften (2018)
0.03
0.025799721 = product of:
0.051599443 = sum of:
0.051599443 = product of:
0.077399164 = sum of:
0.041986477 = weight(_text_:g in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041986477 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.035412684 = weight(_text_:c in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035412684 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Themenheft: Düsseldorfer und Grazer Informationswissenschaft / Gastherausgeber: Wolfgang G. Stock, Christian Schlögl.
-
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006)
0.02
0.02404955 = product of:
0.0480991 = sum of:
0.0480991 = product of:
0.07214865 = sum of:
0.041734252 = weight(_text_:c in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041734252 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15486681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.030414397 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030414397 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:11:05
-
Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009)
0.02
0.022854544 = product of:
0.04570909 = sum of:
0.04570909 = product of:
0.13712727 = sum of:
0.13712727 = weight(_text_:g in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13712727 = score(doc=3313,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.81318647 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The g-index is discussed in terms of the average number of citations of the publications in the g-core, showing that it combines features of the h-index and the A-index in one number. For a visualization, data of 8 famous physicists are presented and analyzed. In comparison with the h-index, the g-index increases between 67% and 144%, on average by a factor of 2.
- Object
- g-index
-
Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011)
0.02
0.021801043 = product of:
0.043602087 = sum of:
0.043602087 = product of:
0.065403126 = sum of:
0.03498873 = weight(_text_:g in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03498873 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16862954 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.030414397 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030414397 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1572205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044896673 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:19:42
