Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.04 
    0.03526516 = product of:
  0.07053032 = sum of:
    0.07053032 = sum of:
      0.020730218 = weight(_text_:d in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020730218 = score(doc=261,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045945734 = queryNorm
          0.237484 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049800098 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045945734 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Language
    d
  2. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.00 
    0.004580774 = product of:
  0.009161548 = sum of:
    0.009161548 = product of:
      0.018323096 = sum of:
        0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323096 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  3. Grasso, L.L.; Wahlig, H.: Google und seine Suchparameter : Eine Top 20-Precision Analyse anhand repräsentativ ausgewählter Anfragen (2005) 0.00 
    0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  4. Günther, M.: Vermitteln Suchmaschinen vollständige Bilder aktueller Themen? : Untersuchung der Gewichtung inhaltlicher Aspekte von Suchmaschinenergebnissen in Deutschland und den USA (2016) 0.00 
    0.0032390966 = product of:
  0.006478193 = sum of:
    0.006478193 = product of:
      0.012956386 = sum of:
        0.012956386 = weight(_text_:d in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012956386 = score(doc=3068,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  5. Griesbaum, J.: Evaluierung hybrider Suchsysteme im WWW (2000) 0.00 
    0.0027484642 = product of:
  0.0054969285 = sum of:
    0.0054969285 = product of:
      0.010993857 = sum of:
        0.010993857 = weight(_text_:d in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010993857 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    d
  6. Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016) 0.00 
    0.002290387 = product of:
  0.004580774 = sum of:
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009161548 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types