-
Bauckhage, C.: Marginalizing over the PageRank damping factor (2014)
0.00
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = product of:
0.018323096 = sum of:
0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323096 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Lewandowski, D.: How can library materials be ranked in the OPAC? (2009)
0.00
0.002290387 = product of:
0.004580774 = sum of:
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009161548 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Austin, D.: How Google finds your needle in the Web's haystack : as we'll see, the trick is to ask the web itself to rank the importance of pages... (2006)
0.00
0.0016032709 = product of:
0.0032065418 = sum of:
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = weight(_text_:d in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064130835 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
