-
Atran, S.: Basic conceptual domains (1989)
0.03
0.026756238 = product of:
0.053512476 = sum of:
0.053512476 = product of:
0.10702495 = sum of:
0.10702495 = weight(_text_:x in 478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10702495 = score(doc=478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=478)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229754925_1_Basic_Conceptual_Domains. Vgl. auch: DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00234.x.
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.02
0.021467676 = product of:
0.042935353 = sum of:
0.042935353 = product of:
0.085870706 = sum of:
0.085870706 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085870706 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.02
0.018400865 = product of:
0.03680173 = sum of:
0.03680173 = product of:
0.07360346 = sum of:
0.07360346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07360346 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Strauß, G.; Hass, U.; Harras, G.: Brisante Wörter von Agitation bis Zeitgeist : ein Lexikon zum öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch (1989)
0.02
0.017837493 = product of:
0.035674985 = sum of:
0.035674985 = product of:
0.07134997 = sum of:
0.07134997 = weight(_text_:x in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07134997 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 3-11-012078-X
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.01
0.012267244 = product of:
0.024534488 = sum of:
0.024534488 = product of:
0.049068976 = sum of:
0.049068976 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049068976 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015)
0.01
0.011148433 = product of:
0.022296866 = sum of:
0.022296866 = product of:
0.044593733 = sum of:
0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044593733 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.01
0.011036386 = product of:
0.022072772 = sum of:
0.022072772 = product of:
0.044145543 = sum of:
0.044145543 = weight(_text_:x in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044145543 = score(doc=1077,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.23092794 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
- Type
- x
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.01
0.010733838 = product of:
0.021467676 = sum of:
0.021467676 = product of:
0.042935353 = sum of:
0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042935353 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.01
0.010733838 = product of:
0.021467676 = sum of:
0.021467676 = product of:
0.042935353 = sum of:
0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042935353 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-33
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.01
0.009200432 = product of:
0.018400865 = sum of:
0.018400865 = product of:
0.03680173 = sum of:
0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03680173 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.01
0.0076670274 = product of:
0.015334055 = sum of:
0.015334055 = product of:
0.03066811 = sum of:
0.03066811 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03066811 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.01
0.0076670274 = product of:
0.015334055 = sum of:
0.015334055 = product of:
0.03066811 = sum of:
0.03066811 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03066811 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.01
0.0076670274 = product of:
0.015334055 = sum of:
0.015334055 = product of:
0.03066811 = sum of:
0.03066811 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03066811 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0076670274 = product of:
0.015334055 = sum of:
0.015334055 = product of:
0.03066811 = sum of:
0.03066811 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03066811 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.01
0.0066890595 = product of:
0.013378119 = sum of:
0.013378119 = product of:
0.026756238 = sum of:
0.026756238 = weight(_text_:x in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026756238 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.045271195 = queryNorm
0.13996346 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 3-540-67859-X
