Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.06 
    0.06474403 = product of:
  0.12948807 = sum of:
    0.12948807 = sum of:
      0.09268634 = weight(_text_:x in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09268634 = score(doc=590,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045271195 = queryNorm
          0.48484772 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03680173 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045271195 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  2. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.05 
    0.045157105 = product of:
  0.09031421 = sum of:
    0.09031421 = sum of:
      0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053512476 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045271195 = queryNorm
          0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03680173 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045271195 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.024534488 = product of:
  0.049068976 = sum of:
    0.049068976 = product of:
      0.09813795 = sum of:
        0.09813795 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09813795 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02 
    0.024534488 = product of:
  0.049068976 = sum of:
    0.049068976 = product of:
      0.09813795 = sum of:
        0.09813795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09813795 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.02 
    0.022296866 = product of:
  0.044593733 = sum of:
    0.044593733 = product of:
      0.089187466 = sum of:
        0.089187466 = weight(_text_:x in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089187466 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.4665449 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Isbn
    0-313-29514-X
  6. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.021685628 = product of:
  0.043371256 = sum of:
    0.043371256 = product of:
      0.08674251 = sum of:
        0.08674251 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08674251 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  7. Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023) 0.02 
    0.019309655 = product of:
  0.03861931 = sum of:
    0.03861931 = product of:
      0.07723862 = sum of:
        0.07723862 = weight(_text_:x in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07723862 = score(doc=847,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.40403977 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02 
    0.015334055 = product of:
  0.03066811 = sum of:
    0.03066811 = product of:
      0.06133622 = sum of:
        0.06133622 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133622 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Isbn
    0-89495-024-X
  10. Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.: Do citation chimeras exist? : The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition (2019) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.013011377 = product of:
  0.026022755 = sum of:
    0.026022755 = product of:
      0.05204551 = sum of:
        0.05204551 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05204551 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  13. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.012267244 = product of:
  0.024534488 = sum of:
    0.024534488 = product of:
      0.049068976 = sum of:
        0.049068976 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049068976 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  14. Jiang, X.; Liu, J.: Extracting the evolutionary backbone of scientific domains : the semantic main path network analysis approach based on citation context analysis (2023) 0.01 
    0.011148433 = product of:
  0.022296866 = sum of:
    0.022296866 = product of:
      0.044593733 = sum of:
        0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044593733 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.010733838 = product of:
  0.021467676 = sum of:
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042935353 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  16. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.010733838 = product of:
  0.021467676 = sum of:
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042935353 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  17. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.010733838 = product of:
  0.021467676 = sum of:
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042935353 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  18. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  19. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  20. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 5

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications