Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.04 
    0.035674985 = product of:
  0.07134997 = sum of:
    0.07134997 = product of:
      0.14269994 = sum of:
        0.14269994 = weight(_text_:x in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14269994 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.7464718 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  2. Krömmelbein, U.: linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, RSWK, Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS : Schlagwort-Syntax (1983) 0.02 
    0.022296866 = product of:
  0.044593733 = sum of:
    0.044593733 = product of:
      0.089187466 = sum of:
        0.089187466 = weight(_text_:x in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089187466 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.4665449 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  3. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02 
    0.021467676 = product of:
  0.042935353 = sum of:
    0.042935353 = product of:
      0.085870706 = sum of:
        0.085870706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085870706 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  4. Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984) 0.02 
    0.017837493 = product of:
  0.035674985 = sum of:
    0.035674985 = product of:
      0.07134997 = sum of:
        0.07134997 = weight(_text_:x in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07134997 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  5. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.02 
    0.017348502 = product of:
  0.034697004 = sum of:
    0.034697004 = product of:
      0.06939401 = sum of:
        0.06939401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06939401 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  6. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.02 
    0.015607806 = product of:
  0.031215612 = sum of:
    0.031215612 = product of:
      0.062431224 = sum of:
        0.062431224 = weight(_text_:x in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062431224 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    x
  7. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02 
    0.015334055 = product of:
  0.03066811 = sum of:
    0.03066811 = product of:
      0.06133622 = sum of:
        0.06133622 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133622 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  8. Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999) 0.01 
    0.013378119 = product of:
  0.026756238 = sum of:
    0.026756238 = product of:
      0.053512476 = sum of:
        0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053512476 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    X,183
  9. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01 
    0.010733838 = product of:
  0.021467676 = sum of:
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042935353 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01 
    0.010733838 = product of:
  0.021467676 = sum of:
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042935353 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  11. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.010733838 = product of:
  0.021467676 = sum of:
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042935353 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.01 
    0.009200432 = product of:
  0.018400865 = sum of:
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03680173 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985) 0.01 
    0.008918746 = product of:
  0.017837493 = sum of:
    0.017837493 = product of:
      0.035674985 = sum of:
        0.035674985 = weight(_text_:x in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035674985 = score(doc=3641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.18661796 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The second Cranfield experiment (Cranfield II) in the mid-1960s challenged assumptions held by librarians for nearly a century, namely, that the objective of providing subject access was to bring together all materials an a given topic and that the achieving of this objective required vocabulary control in the form of an index language. The results of Cranfield II were replicated by other retrieval experiments quick to follow its lead and increasing support was given to the opinion that natural language information systems could perform at least as effectively, and certainly more economically, than those employing index languages. When the results of empirical research dramatically counter conventional wisdom, an obvious course is to question the validity of the research and, in the case of retrieval experiments, this eventually happened. Retrieval experiments were criticized for their artificiality, their unrepresentative sampies, and their problematic definitions-particularly the definition of relevance. In the minds of some, at least, the relative merits of natural languages vs. indexing languages continued to be an unresolved issue. As with many eitherlor options, a seemingly safe course to follow is to opt for "both," and indeed there seems to be an increasing amount of counsel advising a combination of natural language and index language search capabilities. One strong voice offering such counsel is that of Robert Fugmann, a chemist by training, a theoretician by predilection, and, currently, a practicing information scientist at Hoechst AG, Frankfurt/Main. This selection from his writings sheds light an the capabilities and limitations of both kinds of indexing. Its special significance lies in the fact that its arguments are based not an empirical but an rational grounds. Fugmann's major argument starts from the observation that in natural language there are essentially two different kinds of concepts: 1) individual concepts, repre sented by names of individual things (e.g., the name of the town Augsburg), and 2) general concepts represented by names of classes of things (e.g., pesticides). Individual concepts can be represented in language simply and succinctly, often by a single string of alphanumeric characters; general concepts, an the other hand, can be expressed in a multiplicity of ways. The word pesticides refers to the concept of pesticides, but also referring to this concept are numerous circumlocutions, such as "Substance X was effective against pests." Because natural language is capable of infinite variety, we cannot predict a priori the manifold ways a general concept, like pesticides, will be represented by any given author. It is this lack of predictability that limits natural language retrieval and causes poor precision and recall. Thus, the essential and defining characteristic of an index language ls that it is a tool for representational predictability.
  14. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.01 
    0.0076670274 = product of:
  0.015334055 = sum of:
    0.015334055 = product of:
      0.03066811 = sum of:
        0.03066811 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03066811 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  15. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01 
    0.005366919 = product of:
  0.010733838 = sum of:
    0.010733838 = product of:
      0.021467676 = sum of:
        0.021467676 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021467676 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045271195 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications