Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dousa, T.M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010) 0.01
    0.014777819 = product of:
      0.029555637 = sum of:
        0.029555637 = sum of:
          0.0066764825 = weight(_text_:e in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066764825 = score(doc=3509,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
          0.022879155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022879155 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In light of ongoing debates about ontological vs. epistemological approaches to knowledge organization (KO), this paper examines E. C. Richardson's treatment of ontology and epistemology in his theory of classification. According to Richardson, there is a natural order of things in the world accessible to human cognition, which may be expressed in two classificatory orders: evolutionary classification, which ranges classes of things from the most simple to the most complex, and logical classification, which ranges classes of things in the inverse order, from the most complex to the most simple. Evolutionary classification reflects ontological order and logical classification reflects epistemological order: both are faces of a single natural order. Such a view requires adherence to a representationalist, or, in Hjorland's (2008) terms, positivist understanding of epistemology, wherein human knowledge faithfully mirrors the structure of the external world. Richardson's harmonization of ontology and epistemology will find little favor among proponents of the currently fashionable pragmatist approach to KO. Nevertheless, it constitutes an early version of what Gnoli (2004) terms a naturalistic epistemology, which, once deepened and clarified, offers the best prospects for an explicit expression of both the ontological and epistemological dimensions of knowledge within a single classification of general scope.
    Language
    e
    Pages
    S.15-22
  2. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.01
    0.0133669125 = product of:
      0.026733825 = sum of:
        0.026733825 = sum of:
          0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003854669 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.022879155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022879155 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.01
    0.0133669125 = product of:
      0.026733825 = sum of:
        0.026733825 = sum of:
          0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003854669 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.022879155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022879155 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Dousa, T.M.: Classificatory structure and the evaluation of document classifications : the case of constitutive classification (2014) 0.01
    0.01069353 = product of:
      0.02138706 = sum of:
        0.02138706 = sum of:
          0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 1424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003083735 = score(doc=1424,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 1424, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1424)
          0.018303324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018303324 = score(doc=1424,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03377341 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1424, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1424)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Dousa, T.M.: Documentary languages and the demarcation of information units in textual information : the case of Julius O. Kaisers's Systematic Indexing (2014) 0.00
    0.0019273345 = product of:
      0.003854669 = sum of:
        0.003854669 = product of:
          0.007709338 = sum of:
            0.007709338 = weight(_text_:e in 1311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007709338 = score(doc=1311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  6. Dousa, T.M.: Classical pragmatism and its varieties : on a pluriform metatheoretical perspective for knowledge organization (2010) 0.00
    0.0016353976 = product of:
      0.003270795 = sum of:
        0.003270795 = product of:
          0.00654159 = sum of:
            0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 3357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00654159 = score(doc=3357,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3357, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3357)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Pragmatism is a metatheoretical perspective within knowledge organization (KO) that derives from an American philosophical tradition active since the late 19th century. Its core feature is commitment to the evaluation of the adequacy of concepts and beliefs through the empirical test of practice: this entails epistemological antifoundationalism, fallibilism, contingency, social embeddedness, and pluralism. This article reviews three variants of Pragmatism that have been historically influential in philosophy-Charles Sanders Pierce's scientifically oriented pragmaticism, William James's subjectivist practicalism, and John Dewey's socially oriented instrumentalism-and indicates points of contact between them and KO theories propounded by Henry E. Bliss, Jesse H. Shera, and Birger Hjørland, respectively. KO applications of classical Pragmatism have tended to converge toward a socially pluralist model characteristic of Dewey. Recently, Richard Rorty's post-modern brand of Neopragmatism has found adherents within KO: whether it provides a more advantageous metatheoretical framework than classical Pragmatism remains to be seen.
    Language
    e
  7. Smiraglia, R.P.; Heuvel, C. van den; Dousa, T.M.: Interactions between elementary structures in universes of knowledge (2011) 0.00
    0.0016353976 = product of:
      0.003270795 = sum of:
        0.003270795 = product of:
          0.00654159 = sum of:
            0.00654159 = weight(_text_:e in 4812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00654159 = score(doc=4812,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 4812, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
  8. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00
    0.0013352965 = product of:
      0.002670593 = sum of:
        0.002670593 = product of:
          0.005341186 = sum of:
            0.005341186 = weight(_text_:e in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005341186 = score(doc=3859,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.11002572 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
    Language
    e
  9. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00
    0.0013352965 = product of:
      0.002670593 = sum of:
        0.002670593 = product of:
          0.005341186 = sum of:
            0.005341186 = weight(_text_:e in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005341186 = score(doc=4141,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.11002572 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
    Language
    e
  10. Dousa, T.M.: Julius Otto Kaiser : the early years (2013) 0.00
    0.0011564007 = product of:
      0.0023128013 = sum of:
        0.0023128013 = product of:
          0.0046256026 = sum of:
            0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0046256026 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Dousa, T.M.: Whither pragmatism in knowledge organization? : Classical pragmatism vs. neopragmatism as KO metatheories (2010) 0.00
    9.6366723E-4 = product of:
      0.0019273345 = sum of:
        0.0019273345 = product of:
          0.003854669 = sum of:
            0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 3517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003854669 = score(doc=3517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03377341 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3517)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e