Search (495 results, page 25 of 25)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Ming, W.; Zhao, Z.: Rethinking the open access citation advantage : evidence from the "reverse-flipping" journals (2022) 0.00 
    9.6366723E-4 = product of:
  0.0019273345 = sum of:
    0.0019273345 = product of:
      0.003854669 = sum of:
        0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003854669 = score(doc=750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  2. Siler, K.; Larivière, V.: Varieties of diffusion in academic publishing : how status and legitimacy influence growth trajectories of new innovations (2024) 0.00 
    9.6366723E-4 = product of:
  0.0019273345 = sum of:
    0.0019273345 = product of:
      0.003854669 = sum of:
        0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003854669 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  3. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00 
    8.176988E-4 = product of:
  0.0016353976 = sum of:
    0.0016353976 = product of:
      0.003270795 = sum of:
        0.003270795 = weight(_text_:e in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003270795 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.06737672 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    Language
    e
  4. Brand, A.: CrossRef turns one (2001) 0.00 
    8.176988E-4 = product of:
  0.0016353976 = sum of:
    0.0016353976 = product of:
      0.003270795 = sum of:
        0.003270795 = weight(_text_:e in 1222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003270795 = score(doc=1222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.06737672 = fieldWeight in 1222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1222)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    CrossRef, the only full-blown application of the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®) System to date, is now a little over a year old. What started as a cooperative effort among publishers and technologists to prototype DOI-based linking of citations in e-journals evolved into an independent, non-profit enterprise in early 2000. We have made considerable headway during our first year, but there is still much to be done. When CrossRef went live with its collaborative linking service last June, it had enabled reference links in roughly 1,100 journals from a member base of 33 publishers, using a functional prototype system. The DOI-X prototype was described in an article published in D-Lib Magazine in February of 2000. On the occasion of CrossRef's first birthday as a live service, this article provides a non-technical overview of our progress to date and the major hurdles ahead. The electronic medium enriches the research literature arena for all players -- researchers, librarians, and publishers -- in numerous ways. Information has been made easier to discover, to share, and to sell. To take a simple example, the aggregation of book metadata by electronic booksellers was a huge boon to scholars seeking out obscure backlist titles, or discovering books they would never otherwise have known to exist. It was equally a boon for the publishers of those books, who saw an unprecedented surge in sales of backlist titles with the advent of centralized electronic bookselling. In the serials sphere, even in spite of price increases and the turmoil surrounding site licenses for some prime electronic content, libraries overall are now able to offer more content to more of their patrons. Yet undoubtedly, the key enrichment for academics and others navigating a scholarly corpus is linking, and in particular the linking that takes the reader out of one document and into another in the matter of a click or two. Since references are how authors make explicit the links between their work and precedent scholarship, what could be more fundamental to the reader than making those links immediately actionable? That said, automated linking is only really useful from a research perspective if it works across publications and across publishers. Not only do academics think about their own writings and those of their colleagues in terms of "author, title, rough date" -- the name of the journal itself is usually not high on the list of crucial identifying features -- but they are oblivious as to the identity of the publishers of all but their very favorite books and journals.
    Language
    e
  5. Kapustina, T.A.: Electronic library, electronic publishing, electronic document delivery : impressions from a Belarusian-German seminar (2002) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  6. Harvey, D.R.: Preserving digital materials (2005) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  7. Lawrence, S.: Online or Invisible? (2001) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=1063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  8. Joint, N.: Is digitisation the new circulation? : borrowing trends, digitisation and the nature of reading in US and UK libraries (2008) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  9. Knuth, D.E.: Mathematical typography (1979) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  10. Nelson, G.M.; Eggett, D.L.: Citations, mandates, and money : author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals (2017) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=3838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  11. Papin-Ramcharan, J.; Dawe, R.A.: ¬The other side of the coin for open access publishing : a developing country view (2006) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 5070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=5070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 5070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5070)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  12. Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  13. Laakso, M.; Matthias, L.; Jahn, N.: Open is not forever : a study of vanished open access journals (2021) 0.00 
    7.7093375E-4 = product of:
  0.0015418675 = sum of:
    0.0015418675 = product of:
      0.003083735 = sum of:
        0.003083735 = weight(_text_:e in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003083735 = score(doc=333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  14. Kamke, H.-U.; Dippold, S.; Groß, S.; Bahne, T.; Zimmermann, K.; Schulz, M.; Dobratz, S.; Becker, H.; Diepold, P.: ¬Das DFG-Projekt Dissertationen Online stellt sich vor (1999) 0.00 
    6.74567E-4 = product of:
  0.001349134 = sum of:
    0.001349134 = product of:
      0.002698268 = sum of:
        0.002698268 = weight(_text_:e in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002698268 = score(doc=5016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.05558295 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    I. Teilbericht 1: A. Überblick über das Projekt von Hans-Ulrich Kamke; Humboldt Universität zu Berlin. - 1. Einleitung - 2. Vorgeschichte - 3. Das Projekt Dissertationen online im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes... - 4. Das DFG-Projekt - 4.1 Aufgaben und Ziele - 4.2 Die Teilprojekte - 4.3 Ergebnisse und Weiterarbeit - B. Teilprojekt Beratung und Unterstützung von Steffi Dippold und Stefan Groß; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. - 1. Informationsvermittlung, nicht Informationsüberlastung - 2. Schulung der Doktoranden - 3. Dissinfo - ein Informationsangebot im Internet - 4. Explosion des Wissens - 5. Weg aus der Einbahnstrasse - 6. Kontakt nach außen. II. Teilbericht 2: C. Teilprojekt Metadaten von Thorsten Bahne; Gerhard Mercator; Universität Duisburg. - 1. Hintergrundinformationen zu Metadaten - 2. Metadaten in Dissonline - 2.1 Datensatzentwicklung - 2.2 Tools - 2.3 Installation - 2.4 Nutzung - 3. Suche mit Metadaten. - D. Teilprojekt Retrieval und rechtliche Aspekte von Kerstin Zimmermann; Carl von Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg: 1. Weltweites Retrieval nach und in Dissertationen - 1.1 Harvest: Funktionsweise - 1.2 Aufbau eines Harvest-Netzwerkes - 1.3 Kooperationen mit anderen Sy stemen - 2. Rechtliche Aspekte bei elektronischen Dissertationen - 2.1 Promotionsverfahren - 2.2 Online Publikation - 2.3 Nationale Datenbanken. - III. Teilbericht 3: E. Teilprojekt Formate von Matthias Schulz und Susanne Dobratz; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: 1. Dokumentformate - 1.3 Was ist ein Dokument? - 1.2 Dokumentformate für die Archivierung und das Retrieval - 1.3 Dokumentformate für die Präsentation und den Druck - 2. Die DiML-Dokumenttypdefinition - 2.1 Beschreibung der DiML-DTD - 2.2 Vergleich / Kooperation mit anderen Dissertations-DTD's - 3. Wissensmanagement mit SGML/XML-Dokumenten - F. Teilprojekt Multimedia von N.N.; Computer Chemie Centrum Universität Erlangen:1. Multimediadaten in der Chemie - 1.1 Voraussetzungen für die Nutzung von Strukturdaten (Aufbereitung der Rohdaten) - 1.2 Suche in Chemischen Strukturen - 2. Multimediadaten in anderen Wissen schaften - 2.1 Datenformate - 2.2 Zur Akzeptanz und Nutzung von Multimediadaten in den Wissenschaften -IV. Teilbericht 4. - G. Teilprojekte Bibliotheken und Die Deutsche Bibliothek von Hans Becker; SUB Göttingen: 1. Bibliothekarische Aspekte bei der Publikation elektronischer Dissertationen - 2. Integration in den Workflow der Universitätsbibliotheken - 3. Zusammenarbeit mit Der Deutschen Bibliothek. - H. Dissertationen Online: Ergebnisse und Ausblick von Peter Diepold; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: 1. Ergebnisse der 2 Projektjahre - 2. Dissertationen Online im internationalen Kontext - 3. Wie geht es weiter mit Dissertationen Online?
  15. Willinsky, J.: ¬The access principle : the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006) 0.00 
    4.8183362E-4 = product of:
  9.6366723E-4 = sum of:
    9.6366723E-4 = product of:
      0.0019273345 = sum of:
        0.0019273345 = weight(_text_:e in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019273345 = score(doc=298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.03970211 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 406
  • d 87
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 431
  • m 31
  • el 27
  • s 16
  • r 9
  • n 3
  • b 2
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications