-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.05
0.053634856 = product of:
0.10726971 = sum of:
0.10726971 = sum of:
0.03599283 = weight(_text_:m in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03599283 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.07127688 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07127688 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
- Type
- m
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.03
0.030648489 = product of:
0.061296977 = sum of:
0.061296977 = sum of:
0.020567331 = weight(_text_:m in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020567331 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.040729646 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040729646 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.03
0.030648489 = product of:
0.061296977 = sum of:
0.061296977 = sum of:
0.020567331 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020567331 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.040729646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040729646 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Type
- m
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.03
0.026817428 = product of:
0.053634856 = sum of:
0.053634856 = sum of:
0.017996415 = weight(_text_:m in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017996415 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.03563844 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03563844 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.03
0.02618109 = product of:
0.05236218 = sum of:
0.05236218 = sum of:
0.02181495 = weight(_text_:m in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181495 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.03
0.02618109 = product of:
0.05236218 = sum of:
0.05236218 = sum of:
0.02181495 = weight(_text_:m in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181495 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016)
0.03
0.02618109 = product of:
0.05236218 = sum of:
0.05236218 = sum of:
0.02181495 = weight(_text_:m in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02181495 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:40:53
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.02
0.024427421 = product of:
0.048854843 = sum of:
0.048854843 = sum of:
0.012854583 = weight(_text_:m in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012854583 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.03600026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03600026 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Zitt, M.; Lelu, A.; Bassecoulard, E.: Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping : Portolan charts of research fields? (2011)
0.02
0.02386041 = product of:
0.04772082 = sum of:
0.04772082 = sum of:
0.02226479 = weight(_text_:m in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02226479 = score(doc=4130,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
0.025456028 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025456028 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The mapping of scientific fields, based on principles established in the seventies, has recently shown a remarkable development and applications are now booming with progress in computing efficiency. We examine here the convergence of two thematic mapping approaches, citation-based and word-based, which rely on quite different sociological backgrounds. A corpus in the nanoscience field was broken down into research themes, using the same clustering technique on the 2 networks separately. The tool for comparison is the table of intersections of the M clusters (here M=50) built on either side. A classical visual exploitation of such contingency tables is based on correspondence analysis. We investigate a rearrangement of the intersection table (block modeling), resulting in pseudo-map. The interest of this representation for confronting the two breakdowns is discussed. The amount of convergence found is, in our view, a strong argument in favor of the reliability of bibliometric mapping. However, the outcomes are not convergent at the degree where they can be substituted for each other. Differences highlight the complementarity between approaches based on different networks. In contrast with the strong informetric posture found in recent literature, where lexical and citation markers are considered as miscible tokens, the framework proposed here does not mix the two elements at an early stage, in compliance with their contrasted logic.
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 18:22:50
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.02
0.02386041 = product of:
0.04772082 = sum of:
0.04772082 = sum of:
0.02226479 = weight(_text_:m in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02226479 = score(doc=995,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.025456028 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025456028 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.02
0.022986365 = product of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.015425499 = weight(_text_:m in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015425499 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
-
Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012)
0.02
0.022986365 = product of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.015425499 = weight(_text_:m in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015425499 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:23:32
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.02
0.022986365 = product of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.015425499 = weight(_text_:m in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015425499 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.02
0.022986365 = product of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.015425499 = weight(_text_:m in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015425499 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.02
0.022986365 = product of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.015425499 = weight(_text_:m in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015425499 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.02
0.022986365 = product of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.04597273 = sum of:
0.015425499 = weight(_text_:m in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015425499 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.030547233 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030547233 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.02
0.020364823 = product of:
0.040729646 = sum of:
0.040729646 = product of:
0.08145929 = sum of:
0.08145929 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08145929 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.020364823 = product of:
0.040729646 = sum of:
0.040729646 = product of:
0.08145929 = sum of:
0.08145929 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08145929 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.02
0.020364823 = product of:
0.040729646 = sum of:
0.040729646 = product of:
0.08145929 = sum of:
0.08145929 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08145929 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.02
0.019155305 = product of:
0.03831061 = sum of:
0.03831061 = sum of:
0.012854583 = weight(_text_:m in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012854583 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09350918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.025456028 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025456028 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13158931 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0375773 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
