Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.03307864 = product of:
  0.06615728 = sum of:
    0.06615728 = sum of:
      0.016236901 = weight(_text_:a in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016236901 = score(doc=561,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
      0.04992038 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04992038 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database

Source

Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23

Type

a

0.00270615 = product of:
  0.0054123 = sum of:
    0.0054123 = product of:
      0.0108246 = sum of:
        0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 6029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0108246 = score(doc=6029,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6029, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6029)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Provides a bried study evaluating personal bibliographic packages. Personal bibliographic software packages house bibliographic data for researchers to create a growing database of references for eventual citation. Assesses EndNote and Pro-Cite according to interface, capacity, indexing, searching, output formats, in-text citations and downloading. Offers advice on selecting personal bibliographic software packages

Type

a