Fu, R.-X.: ¬The comparison between Chinese and Western bibliography (1996)
0.00
0.0023678814 = product of:
0.0047357627 = sum of:
0.0047357627 = product of:
0.009471525 = sum of:
0.009471525 = weight(_text_:a in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009471525 = score(doc=89,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A comparison of Chinese and Western bibliography reveals many differences. The purpose of traditional Chinese bibliography is to organize documents in a reasonable and valuable way, which essentially reflects the value and importance of human beings and their culture. Modern Western bibliography, on the other hand, attempts to order documents from the angle of form and philosophy, essentially reflecting the understanding of human culture, metaphysics and logic. Asserts that an understanding of the similarities and differences between the 2 approaches can contribute toward a reconsideration of the general theories, methods and techniques of bibliography
- Type
- a
