Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Mills, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Mills, J.: Bibliographic classification (1976) 0.00
    0.0046871896 = product of:
      0.009374379 = sum of:
        0.009374379 = product of:
          0.018748758 = sum of:
            0.018748758 = weight(_text_:a in 1272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018748758 = score(doc=1272,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.3530471 = fieldWeight in 1272, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Classification in the 1970s: a second look. Rev. ed. Ed.: A. Maltby
    Type
    a
  2. Mills, J.: Library classification (1970) 0.00
    0.0033826875 = product of:
      0.006765375 = sum of:
        0.006765375 = product of:
          0.01353075 = sum of:
            0.01353075 = weight(_text_:a in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01353075 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.00
    0.002269176 = product of:
      0.004538352 = sum of:
        0.004538352 = product of:
          0.009076704 = sum of:
            0.009076704 = weight(_text_:a in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009076704 = score(doc=831,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.
    Type
    a