Voigt, M.; Mitschick, A.; Schulz, J.: Yet another triple store benchmark? : practical experiences with real-world data (2012)
0.00
0.0026849252 = product of:
0.0053698504 = sum of:
0.0053698504 = product of:
0.010739701 = sum of:
0.010739701 = weight(_text_:a in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010739701 = score(doc=476,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although quite a number of RDF triple store benchmarks have already been conducted and published, it appears to be not that easy to find the right storage solution for your particular Semantic Web project. A basic reason is the lack of comprehensive performance tests with real-world data. Confronted with this problem, we setup and ran our own tests with a selection of four up-to-date triple store implementations - and came to interesting findings. In this paper, we briefly present the benchmark setup including the store configuration, the datasets, and the test queries. Based on a set of metrics, our results demonstrate the importance of real-world datasets in identifying anomalies or di?erences in reasoning. Finally, we must state that it is indeed difficult to give a general recommendation as no store wins in every field.
- Source
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-912/proceedings.pdf]. Eds.: A. Mitschik et al
