Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.00
    0.003551822 = product of:
      0.007103644 = sum of:
        0.007103644 = product of:
          0.014207288 = sum of:
            0.014207288 = weight(_text_:a in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014207288 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.26752928 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
    Type
    a
  2. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994) 0.00
    0.0026473717 = product of:
      0.0052947435 = sum of:
        0.0052947435 = product of:
          0.010589487 = sum of:
            0.010589487 = weight(_text_:a in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010589487 = score(doc=3085,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
    Type
    a
  3. Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997) 0.00
    0.0016913437 = product of:
      0.0033826875 = sum of:
        0.0033826875 = product of:
          0.006765375 = sum of:
            0.006765375 = weight(_text_:a in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006765375 = score(doc=6343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a

Authors