-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.00
0.0029000505 = product of:
0.005800101 = sum of:
0.005800101 = product of:
0.011600202 = sum of:
0.011600202 = weight(_text_:a in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011600202 = score(doc=5612,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
- Type
- a
-
Ornager, S.: View a picture : theoretical image analysis and empirical user studies on indexing and retrieval (1996)
0.00
0.0029000505 = product of:
0.005800101 = sum of:
0.005800101 = product of:
0.011600202 = sum of:
0.011600202 = weight(_text_:a in 904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011600202 = score(doc=904,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 904, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines Panofsky's and Barthes's theories of image analysis and reports on a study of criteria for analysis and indexing of images and the different types of user queries used in 15 Danish newspaper image archives. A structured interview method and observation and various categories for subject analysis were used. The results identify a list of the minimum number of elements and led to user typology of 5 categories. The requirement for retrieval may involve combining images in a more visual way with text-based image retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Austin, J.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on user's value criteria. Pt.1 (1983)
0.00
0.0028703054 = product of:
0.005740611 = sum of:
0.005740611 = product of:
0.011481222 = sum of:
0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011481222 = score(doc=142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a computer-aided user-system dialogue based on an analysis of users' search behaviour (1984)
0.00
0.0028703054 = product of:
0.005740611 = sum of:
0.005740611 = product of:
0.011481222 = sum of:
0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011481222 = score(doc=1044,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995)
0.00
0.0028703054 = product of:
0.005740611 = sum of:
0.005740611 = product of:
0.011481222 = sum of:
0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011481222 = score(doc=2203,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a framework for knowledge discovery and concept exploration. In order to enhance the concept exploration capability of knowledge based systems and to alleviate the limitation of the manual browsing approach, develops 2 spreading activation based algorithms for concept exploration in large, heterogeneous networks of concepts (eg multiple thesauri). One algorithm, which is based on the symbolic AI paradigma, performs a conventional branch-and-bound search on a semantic net representation to identify other highly relevant concepts (a serial, optimal search process). The 2nd algorithm, which is absed on the neural network approach, executes the Hopfield net parallel relaxation and convergence process to identify 'convergent' concepts for some initial queries (a parallel, heuristic search process). Tests these 2 algorithms on a large text-based knowledge network of about 13.000 nodes (terms) and 80.000 directed links in the area of computing technologies
- Type
- a
-
Buckland, M.K.: Obsolescence in subject description (2012)
0.00
0.0028703054 = product of:
0.005740611 = sum of:
0.005740611 = product of:
0.011481222 = sum of:
0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011481222 = score(doc=299,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The paper aims to explain the character and causes of obsolescence in assigned subject descriptors. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of a conceptual analysis with examples and reference to existing literature. Findings - Subject description comes in two forms: assigning the name or code of a subject to a document and assigning a document to a named subject category. Each method associates a document with the name of a subject. This naming activity is the site of tensions between the procedural need of information systems for stable records and the inherent multiplicity and instability of linguistic expressions. As languages change, previously assigned subject descriptions become obsolescent. The issues, tensions, and compromises involved are introduced. Originality/value - Drawing on the work of Robert Fairthorne and others, an explanation of the unavoidable obsolescence of assigned subject headings is presented. The discussion relates to libraries, but the same issues arise in any context in which subject description is expected to remain useful for an extended period of time.
- Type
- a
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985)
0.00
0.002825101 = product of:
0.005650202 = sum of:
0.005650202 = product of:
0.011300404 = sum of:
0.011300404 = weight(_text_:a in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011300404 = score(doc=3651,freq=62.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.21279141 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
62.0 = termFreq=62.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper, presented at the Ottawa Conference an the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, in 1971, is one of Fairthorne's more perceptive works and deserves a wide audience, especially as it breaks new ground in classification theory. In discussing the notion of discourse, he makes a "distinction between what discourse mentions and what discourse is about" [emphasis added], considered as a "fundamental factor to the relativistic nature of bibliographic classification" (p. 360). A table of mathematical functions, for example, describes exactly something represented by a collection of digits, but, without a preface, this table does not fit into a broader context. Some indication of the author's intent ls needed to fit the table into a broader context. This intent may appear in a title, chapter heading, class number or some other aid. Discourse an and discourse about something "cannot be determined solely from what it mentions" (p. 361). Some kind of background is needed. Fairthorne further develops the theme that knowledge about a subject comes from previous knowledge, thus adding a temporal factor to classification. "Some extra textual criteria are needed" in order to classify (p. 362). For example, "documents that mention the same things, but are an different topics, will have different ancestors, in the sense of preceding documents to which they are linked by various bibliographic characteristics ... [and] ... they will have different descendants" (p. 363). The classifier has to distinguish between documents that "mention exactly the same thing" but are not about the same thing. The classifier does this by classifying "sets of documents that form their histories, their bibliographic world lines" (p. 363). The practice of citation is one method of performing the linking and presents a "fan" of documents connected by a chain of citations to past work. The fan is seen as the effect of generations of documents - each generation connected to the previous one, and all ancestral to the present document. Thus, there are levels in temporal structure-that is, antecedent and successor documents-and these require that documents be identified in relation to other documents. This gives a set of documents an "irrevocable order," a loose order which Fairthorne calls "bibliographic time," and which is "generated by the fact of continual growth" (p. 364). He does not consider "bibliographic time" to be an equivalent to physical time because bibliographic events, as part of communication, require delay. Sets of documents, as indicated above, rather than single works, are used in classification. While an event, a person, a unique feature of the environment, may create a class of one-such as the French Revolution, Napoleon, Niagara Falls-revolutions, emperors, and waterfalls are sets which, as sets, will subsume individuals and make normal classes.
The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.
- Footnote
- Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Mai, J.-E.: Semiotics and indexing : an analysis of the subject indexing process (2001)
0.00
0.0028047764 = product of:
0.005609553 = sum of:
0.005609553 = product of:
0.011219106 = sum of:
0.011219106 = weight(_text_:a in 4480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011219106 = score(doc=4480,freq=22.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 4480, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4480)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explains at least some of the major problems related to the subject indexing process and proposes a new approach to understanding the process, which is ordinarily described as a process that takes a number of steps. The subject is first determined, then it is described in a few sentences and, lastly, the description of the subject is converted into the indexing language. It is argued that this typical approach characteristically lacks an understanding of what the central nature of the process is. Indexing is not a neutral and objective representation of a document's subject matter but the representation of an interpretation of a document for future use. Semiotics is offered here as a framework for understanding the "interpretative" nature of the subject indexing process. By placing this process within Peirce's semiotic framework of ideas and terminology, a more detailed description of the process is offered which shows that the uncertainty generally associated with this process is created by the fact that the indexer goes through a number of steps and creates the subject matter of the document during this process. The creation of the subject matter is based on the indexer's social and cultural context. The paper offers an explanation of what occurs in the indexing process and suggests that there is only little certainty to its result.
- Type
- a
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction and library classification (1978)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics : aboutness, analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents (1986)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Nagel, H.: From image sequences towards conceptual descriptions (1988)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Chubin, D.E.; Moitra, S.D.: Content analysis of references : adjunct or alternative to citation counting? (1975)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=5647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=7510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Hicks, C.; Rush, J.; Strong, S.: Content analysis (1977)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 7514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=7514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Aboutness and selection of topics (1996)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 6150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=6150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Klüver, J.; Kier, R.: Rekonstruktion und Verstehen : ein Computer-Programm zur Interpretation sozialwissenschaftlicher Texte (1994)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 6830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=6830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968)
0.00
0.00270615 = product of:
0.0054123 = sum of:
0.0054123 = product of:
0.0108246 = sum of:
0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0108246 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
