-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.03
0.029554619 = product of:
0.044331927 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.03716652 = product of:
0.07433304 = sum of:
0.07433304 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07433304 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16010343 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
-
Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013)
0.02
0.021414345 = product of:
0.032121517 = sum of:
0.003582703 = weight(_text_:s in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582703 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.028538812 = product of:
0.057077624 = sum of:
0.057077624 = weight(_text_:von in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057077624 = score(doc=928,freq=14.0), product of:
0.12197845 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.46793205 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
- Pages
- S.350-356
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.02
0.019703079 = product of:
0.029554619 = sum of:
0.0047769374 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047769374 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.02477768 = product of:
0.04955536 = sum of:
0.04955536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04955536 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16010343 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.014777309 = product of:
0.022165963 = sum of:
0.003582703 = weight(_text_:s in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582703 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.01858326 = product of:
0.03716652 = sum of:
0.03716652 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03716652 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16010343 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.587-595
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.014777309 = product of:
0.022165963 = sum of:
0.003582703 = weight(_text_:s in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582703 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.01858326 = product of:
0.03716652 = sum of:
0.03716652 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03716652 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16010343 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.2, S.198-201
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.012314424 = product of:
0.018471636 = sum of:
0.0029855857 = weight(_text_:s in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029855857 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.01548605 = product of:
0.0309721 = sum of:
0.0309721 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0309721 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16010343 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.217-229
-
Bornmann, L.: Nature's top 100 revisited (2015)
0.00
0.0028148373 = product of:
0.008444511 = sum of:
0.008444511 = weight(_text_:s in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008444511 = score(doc=2351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Bezug: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2714. Vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23554/abstract.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2166
-
Collins, H.; Bornmann, L.: On scientific misconduct (2014)
0.00
0.0027865467 = product of:
0.00835964 = sum of:
0.00835964 = weight(_text_:s in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00835964 = score(doc=1247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.1089-1090
-
Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011)
0.00
0.0027865467 = product of:
0.00835964 = sum of:
0.00835964 = weight(_text_:s in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00835964 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.197-245
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Statistical tests and research assessments : a comment on Schneider (2012) (2013)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1306-1308
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.428-429
-
Bornmann, L.: Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? (2014)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.647-648
-
Bornmann, L.: ¬The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science (2014)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 1509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=1509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2160-2161
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.; Haunschild, R.: Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists (2015)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 2349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=2349,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2349, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2349)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2715-2716
-
Bornmann, L.: What do altmetrics counts mean? : a plea for content analyses (2016)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.1016-1017
-
Besselaar, P. van den; Wagner, C,; Bornmann, L.: Correct assumptions? (2016)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 3020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=3020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3020)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1779
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Wagner, C,; Bornmann, L.: Replicability and the public/private divide (2016)
0.00
0.0023884687 = product of:
0.007165406 = sum of:
0.007165406 = weight(_text_:s in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165406 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1777-1778
-
Bornmann, L.: Complex tasks and simple solutions : the use of heuristics in the evaluation of research (2015)
0.00
0.0019903905 = product of:
0.0059711714 = sum of:
0.0059711714 = weight(_text_:s in 8911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059711714 = score(doc=8911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 8911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8911)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1738-1739
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015)
0.00
0.0015923125 = product of:
0.0047769374 = sum of:
0.0047769374 = weight(_text_:s in 1556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047769374 = score(doc=1556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1556)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2146-2148
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015)
0.00
0.0015923125 = product of:
0.0047769374 = sum of:
0.0047769374 = weight(_text_:s in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047769374 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045719936 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2146-2148
