Search (41406 results, page 2071 of 2071)

  1. Vocht, L. De: Exploring semantic relationships in the Web of Data : Semantische relaties verkennen in data op het web (2017) 0.00
    4.975976E-4 = product of:
      0.0014927929 = sum of:
        0.0014927929 = weight(_text_:s in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014927929 = score(doc=4232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045719936 = queryNorm
            0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    XXV, 184 S
  2. Hersh, R.: Reply to Martin Gardner (2001) 0.00
    4.925966E-4 = product of:
      0.0014777897 = sum of:
        0.0014777897 = weight(_text_:s in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014777897 = score(doc=3571,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045719936 = queryNorm
            0.029729154 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Gardner, M.: Is mathematics "out there"? In: The Mathematical intelligencer 23(2000) no.1, S.7-8
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 23(2001) no.2, S.3-5
  3. Dodge, M.: ¬A map of Yahoo! (2000) 0.00
    3.9807812E-4 = product of:
      0.0011942344 = sum of:
        0.0011942344 = weight(_text_:s in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011942344 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045719936 = queryNorm
            0.024024783 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Introduction Yahoo! is the undisputed king of the Web directories, providing one of the key information navigation tools on the Internet. It has maintained its popularity over many Internet-years as the most visited Web site, against intense competition. This is because it does a good job of shifting, cataloguing and organising the Web [1] . But what would a map of Yahoo!'s hierarchical classification of the Web look like? Would an interactive map of Yahoo!, rather than the conventional listing of sites, be more useful as navigational tool? We can get some idea what a map of Yahoo! might be like by taking a look at ET-Map, a prototype developed by Hsinchun Chen and colleagues in the Artificial Intelligence Lab [2] at the University of Arizona. ET-Map was developed in 1995 as part of innovative research in automatic Internet homepage categorization and it charts a large chunk of Yahoo!, from the entertainment section representing some 110,000 different Web links. The map is a two-dimensional, multi-layered category map; its aim is to provide an intuitive visual information browsing tool. ET-Map can be browsed interactively, explored and queried, using the familiar point-and-click navigation style of the Web to find information of interest.
  4. Dewey, M.: ¬A classification and subject index for cataloguing and arranging the books and pamphlets of a library (1876) 0.00
    3.9807812E-4 = product of:
      0.0011942344 = sum of:
        0.0011942344 = weight(_text_:s in 5984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011942344 = score(doc=5984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045719936 = queryNorm
            0.024024783 = fieldWeight in 5984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5984)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    44 S
  5. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.00
    3.9807812E-4 = product of:
      0.0011942344 = sum of:
        0.0011942344 = weight(_text_:s in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011942344 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045719936 = queryNorm
            0.024024783 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.
  6. Williamson, N.: Classification research issues (2004) 0.00
    3.4831834E-4 = product of:
      0.001044955 = sum of:
        0.001044955 = weight(_text_:s in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001044955 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049708433 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045719936 = queryNorm
            0.021021685 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.4, S.252-254

Authors

Languages

Themes

Subjects

Classifications