Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Capurro, R."
  1. Capurro, R.: Wissensmanagement in Theorie und Praxis (1998) 0.01
    0.011673857 = product of:
      0.04669543 = sum of:
        0.04669543 = sum of:
          0.006207845 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006207845 = score(doc=2848,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04269026 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.040487584 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040487584 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.149494 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04269026 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Management von Daten, Information und wissen prägt die aktuelle Theorie und Praxis unternehmerischen Handelns. Der hier gewählte Einstieg in die theoretische Diskussion bildet der klassische Ansatz von I. Nonaka und H. Takeuchi über kreative Prozesse im Umgang mit der Wissensressource in Unternehmen. Es wird dabei auf Rezeption und Kritik dieses Ansatzes durch G. Schreyögg, Chr. Noss, D.B. Bürgel, A. Zeller und P. Reinmöller eingegangen. Im zweiten Teil, der sich mit der Praxis des Wissensmanagements befaßt, werden Beispiele aus Nonaka/Takeuchi sowie aus den von Th. Davenport und L. Prusak in ihrem Buch 'Working knowledge' (1997) analysierten Fällen aufgeführt. Die Darstellung schließt mit Hinweisen auf deutsche Unternehmen sowie auf Veranstaltungen und Websites zu diesem Thema. Der Ausblick gibt Auskunft über die Bedeutung von Wissensmanagement in der FH Stuttgart (HBI)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.3, S.344-353
    Type
    a
  2. Capurro, R.: Buchkultur im Informationszeitalter : Überlegungen zum Bezug zwischen Bibliotheken, Datenbanken und Nutzern (1984) 0.01
    0.010121896 = product of:
      0.040487584 = sum of:
        0.040487584 = product of:
          0.08097517 = sum of:
            0.08097517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08097517 = score(doc=2684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.149494 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  3. Capurro, R.: Skeptisches Wissensmanagement (2003) 0.01
    0.00950153 = product of:
      0.03800612 = sum of:
        0.03800612 = weight(_text_:da in 750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03800612 = score(doc=750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20483522 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04269026 = queryNorm
            0.18554485 = fieldWeight in 750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=750)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    "Ich bestreite, dass wir wissen, ob wir etwas wissen oder nicht wissen; noch nicht einmal das wissen wir oder wissen es nicht; noch überhaupt, ob etwas ist oder nichts ist." So lautet die gegenüber dem Sokratischen Nicht-Wissen gesteigerte Skepsis des Metrodor von Chios, eines Schülers des Demokrit, in einem von Cicero tradierten Zitat (Diels/Kranz 1956, B1). Managen läßt sich nur, was ist und wovon wir ein Wissen haben können. Also läßt sich Wissen nicht managen. Skeptisches Wissensmanagement - ein Oxymoron? Demgegenüber steht unsere heutige gewaltige Wissens- und Informationsindustrie und die durch sie mitverursachte dritte industrielle Revolution. Die Industriegesellschaft ist zu einer Wissensindustriegesellschaft geworden. Es steht also nicht nur fest, dass wir wissen, sondern, dass wir viel wissen und wissen können. Die Frage ist nur, wie wir das Wissen und das Wissenkönnen nutzen. Der Skeptiker hat kein Kriterium um wahre von falschen Meinungen zu unterscheiden. Er enthält sich deshalb des Urteils und erreicht damit die innere Ruhe (ataraxia). Er beherrscht, so Friedo Ricken, "die Kunst, 'Erscheinungen' (phainomena) und 'Gedanken' (noumena) einander entgegenzusetzen. Er ist imstande, zu jeder Wahrnehmung eine andere zu finden, die mit der ersten nicht vereinbar ist." (Ricken 1994, 105). Paradoxerweise können wir sagen, dass der Skeptiker ein Manager des Nicht-Wissens ist. Sein Ziel ist, wie schon bei Sokrates, therapeutisch: Er will nämlich vom vorschnellen Urteil sowie vom Dünkel (oiesis) heilen und dafür letztlich, im Unterschied zur sokratischen Heilkunst, den Patienten von der Wahrheitssuche befreien (Ricken 1994, 106-107). Paradox ist auch, dass der Skeptiker zwar den Dogmatiker, der nach sicherer Erkenntnis (episteme) sucht, bekämpft, aber als Ziel seiner Lebenstechnik eine Lebensform anstrebt, bei der der Wert der 'inneren Ruhe' feststeht. Dafür muß er die Wahrheitssuche und die Suche nach Werturteilen aufgeben. Dogmatiker und Skeptiker haben aber etwas gemeinsam, sie kritisieren die Einstellung der bloßen Meinung (doxa). Skeptisches Denken, so Long, "findet sich überall da, wo die Kluft zwischen göttlichem und menschlichem Verstand betont wird." (Long 1995, Sp. 940) Der Skeptiker radikalisiert die Frage des Vertrauens in göttliches Wissen, indem er seine Skepsis auf das menschliche Wissen, sei es im Alltag (doxa) oder in der Wissenschaft (episteme), ausdehnt. Aus der Sicht des Skeptikers ist Wissensmanagement eine Technik, die etwas vorgibt, was sie nicht leisten kann. Ricken stellt das Denken von Peirce, Wittgenstein und Heidegger in die skeptische Tradition, sofern sie nämlich fundamentalistische Ansprüche der mit Descartes einsetzenden neuzeitlichen Philosophie in Frage stellen. Skeptische Argumentationsfiguren, wie die fünf Tropen des Agrippa (ca. 1. Jh. v.Chr.) - der Dissens (diaphonia), der unendliche Regreß, die Relativität des Urteilenden, die Setzung einer Hypothese und der Zirkelschluß -, finden sich teilweise heute wieder zum Beispiel in der Kritik des naiven Realismus durch das 'Münchhausen-Trilemma' eines Hans Albert (Ricken 1994, 161). Die antike Philosophie wiederum reagierte auf den Skeptizismus mit unterschiedlichen Strategien. Dazu gehören zum Beispiel die Platonische Kritik des sensualistischen Seinsbegriffs und die aristotelische Differenzierung der Wissensarten. Im Folgenden soll exemplarisch gezeigt werden, wie in der gegenwärtigen betriebswirtschaftlichen Diskussion um das Wissensmanagement klassische Fragen und Argumentationsfiguren aus den skeptischen und kritischen Traditionen der Hermeneutik und der Wissenschaftstheorie sowie aus der aristotelischen Wissenstypologie zum Ausdruck kommen.
  4. Capurro, R.; Fleissner, P.; Hofkirchner, W.: Is a unified theory of information feasible? (1997) 0.00
    0.00177367 = product of:
      0.00709468 = sum of:
        0.00709468 = product of:
          0.01418936 = sum of:
            0.01418936 = weight(_text_:a in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01418936 = score(doc=1331,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Capurro, R.: On the genealogy of information (1996) 0.00
    0.0015519613 = product of:
      0.006207845 = sum of:
        0.006207845 = product of:
          0.01241569 = sum of:
            0.01241569 = weight(_text_:a in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01241569 = score(doc=1330,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information: new questions to a multidisciplinary concept. Ed.: K. Kornwachs u. K. Jacoby
    Type
    a
  6. Capurro, R.: Was ist Information? : Hinweise zum Wort- und Begriffsfeld eines umstrittenen Begriffs (1987) 0.00
    0.0012541739 = product of:
      0.0050166957 = sum of:
        0.0050166957 = product of:
          0.010033391 = sum of:
            0.010033391 = weight(_text_:a in 2445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010033391 = score(doc=2445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Capurro, R.: Öffentliche Bibliotheken in der Informationsgesellschaft (1988) 0.00
    0.0012541739 = product of:
      0.0050166957 = sum of:
        0.0050166957 = product of:
          0.010033391 = sum of:
            0.010033391 = weight(_text_:a in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010033391 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Capurro, R.: Was ist Metaphysik? : Anmerkungen zum Verhältnis zwischen Metaphysik und Wahnsinn (2005) 0.00
    0.0010974023 = product of:
      0.004389609 = sum of:
        0.004389609 = product of:
          0.008779218 = sum of:
            0.008779218 = weight(_text_:a in 8821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008779218 = score(doc=8821,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8821, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Capurro, R.: Ansätze zu einer Informationsökologie (1990) 0.00
    0.0010974023 = product of:
      0.004389609 = sum of:
        0.004389609 = product of:
          0.008779218 = sum of:
            0.008779218 = weight(_text_:a in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008779218 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Capurro, R.: Ethische Perspektiven bibliothekarischen Handelns (1995) 0.00
    0.0010974023 = product of:
      0.004389609 = sum of:
        0.004389609 = product of:
          0.008779218 = sum of:
            0.008779218 = weight(_text_:a in 2697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008779218 = score(doc=2697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Capurro, R.; Wiegerling, K.; Brellochs, A.: Informationsethik (1995) 0.00
    0.0010974023 = product of:
      0.004389609 = sum of:
        0.004389609 = product of:
          0.008779218 = sum of:
            0.008779218 = weight(_text_:a in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008779218 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Capurro, R.: Ethos des Cyberspace (1999) 0.00
    0.0010974023 = product of:
      0.004389609 = sum of:
        0.004389609 = product of:
          0.008779218 = sum of:
            0.008779218 = weight(_text_:a in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008779218 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Capurro, R.: ¬"Das Capurrosche Trilemma" (1998) 0.00
    0.0010974023 = product of:
      0.004389609 = sum of:
        0.004389609 = product of:
          0.008779218 = sum of:
            0.008779218 = weight(_text_:a in 1274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008779218 = score(doc=1274,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1274, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1274)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  14. Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002) 0.00
    0.0010776275 = product of:
      0.00431051 = sum of:
        0.00431051 = product of:
          0.00862102 = sum of:
            0.00862102 = weight(_text_:a in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00862102 = score(doc=5079,freq=42.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.17513901 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
                  6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                    42.0 = termFreq=42.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of information as we use it in everyday English, in the sense of knowledge communicated, plays a central role in contemporary society. The development and widespread use of computer networks since the end of World War II, and the emergence of information science as a discipline in the 1950s, are evidence of this focus. Although knowledge and its communication are basic phenomena of every human society, it is the rise of information technology and its global impacts that characterize ours as an information society. It is commonplace to consider information as a basic condition for economic development together with capital, labor, and raw material; but what makes information especially significant at present is its digital nature. The impact of information technology an the natural and social sciences in particular has made this everyday notion a highly controversial concept. Claude Shannon's (1948) "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" is a landmark work, referring to the common use of information with its semantic and pragmatic dimensions, while at the same time redefining the concept within an engineering framework. The fact that the concept of knowledge communication has been designated by the word information seems, prima facie, a linguistic happenstance. For a science like information science (IS), it is of course important how fundamental terms are defined; and in IS, as in other fields, the question of how to define information is often raised. This chapter is an attempt to review the status of the concept of information in IS, with reference also to interdisciplinary trends. In scientific discourse, theoretical concepts are not true or false elements or glimpses of some element of reality; rather, they are constructions designed to do a job in the best possible way. Different conceptions of fundamental terms like information are thus more or less fruitful, depending an the theories (and in the end, the practical actions) they are expected to support. In the opening section, we discuss the problem of defining terms from the perspective of the philosophy of science. The history of a word provides us with anecdotes that are tangential to the concept itself. But in our case, the use of the word information points to a specific perspective from which the concept of knowledge communication has been defined. This perspective includes such characteristics as novelty and relevante; i.e., it refers to the process of knowledge transformation, and particularly to selection and interpretation within a specific context. The discussion leads to the questions of why and when this meaning was designated with the word information. We will explore this history, and we believe that our results may help readers better understand the complexity of the concept with regard to its scientific definitions.
    Discussions about the concept of information in other disciplines are very important for IS because many theories and approaches in IS have their origins elsewhere (see the section "Information as an Interdisciplinary Concept" in this chapter). The epistemological concept of information brings into play nonhuman information processes, particularly in physics and biology. And vice versa: the psychic and sociological processes of selection and interpretation may be considered using objective parameters, leaving aside the semantic dimension, or more precisely, by considering objective or situational parameters of interpretation. This concept can be illustrated also in physical terms with regard to release mechanisms, as we suggest. Our overview of the concept of information in the natural sciences as well as in the humanities and social sciences cannot hope to be comprehensive. In most cases, we can refer only to fragments of theories. However, the reader may wish to follow the leads provided in the bibliography. Readers interested primarily in information science may derive most benefit from the section an "Information in Information Science," in which we offer a detailed explanation of diverse views and theories of information within our field; supplementing the recent ARIST chapter by Cornelius (2002). We show that the introduction of the concept of information circa 1950 to the domain of special librarianship and documentation has in itself had serious consequences for the types of knowledge and theories developed in our field. The important question is not only what meaning we give the term in IS, but also how it relates to other basic terms, such as documents, texts, and knowledge. Starting with an objectivist view from the world of information theory and cybernetics, information science has turned to the phenomena of relevance and interpretation as basic aspects of the concept of information. This change is in no way a turn to a subjectivist theory, but an appraisal of different perspectives that may determine in a particular context what is being considered as informative, be it a "thing" (Buckland, 1991b) or a document. Different concepts of information within information science reflect tensions between a subjective and an objective approach. The concept of interpretation or selection may be considered to be the bridge between these two poles. It is important, however, to consider the different professions involved with the interpretation and selection of knowledge. The most important thing in IS (as in information policy) is to consider information as a constitutive forte in society and, thus, recognize the teleological nature of information systems and services (Braman, 1989).
    Type
    a
  15. Capurro, R.: Ethik im Cyberspace (1997) 0.00
    9.4063056E-4 = product of:
      0.0037625222 = sum of:
        0.0037625222 = product of:
          0.0075250445 = sum of:
            0.0075250445 = weight(_text_:a in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0075250445 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  16. Capurro, R.: Informationsethos und Informationsethik : Gedanken zum verantwortungsvollen Handeln im Bereich der Fachinformation (1988) 0.00
    7.838587E-4 = product of:
      0.0031354348 = sum of:
        0.0031354348 = product of:
          0.0062708696 = sum of:
            0.0062708696 = weight(_text_:a in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062708696 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Capurro, R.: Ich bin ein Weltbürger aus Sinope : Vernetzung als Lebenskunst (1999) 0.00
    7.838587E-4 = product of:
      0.0031354348 = sum of:
        0.0031354348 = product of:
          0.0062708696 = sum of:
            0.0062708696 = weight(_text_:a in 4211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062708696 = score(doc=4211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Capurro, R.: Informationsethik : eine Standortbestimmung (2004) 0.00
    7.838587E-4 = product of:
      0.0031354348 = sum of:
        0.0031354348 = product of:
          0.0062708696 = sum of:
            0.0062708696 = weight(_text_:a in 2444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062708696 = score(doc=2444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2444)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Capurro, R.: Information ethics for and from Africa (2008) 0.00
    7.838587E-4 = product of:
      0.0031354348 = sum of:
        0.0031354348 = product of:
          0.0062708696 = sum of:
            0.0062708696 = weight(_text_:a in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062708696 = score(doc=1869,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The first part of this article deals with some initiatives concerning the role of information ethics for Africa, such as the New Partnership for Africa's Development, United Nations Information Communications Technology (ICT), and the African Information Society Initiative particularly since the World Summit on the Information Society. Information Ethics from Africa is a young academic field, and not much has been published so far on the impact of ICT on African societies and cultures from a philosophical perspective. The second part of the article analyzes some recent research on this matter particularly with regard to the concept of ubuntu. Finally, the article addresses some issues of the African Conference on Information Ethics held February 3-5, 2007, in Pretoria, South Africa.[The following essay is adapted from a keynote address delivered at the Africa Information Ethics Conference in Pretoria, South Africa, February 5-7, 2007. Under the patronage of UNESCO, sponsored by the South African government, and organized with assistance from the Department of Information Science at the University of Pretoria, the School of Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and the supporters and members of the International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE), the theme of the conference was Ethical Challenges in the Information Age: The Joy of Sharing Knowledge. The full version of the address as well as selected articles from the conference were published in Vol. 7 of ICIE's online journal, International Review of Information Ethics (for more information, visit http://icie.zkm.de)]
    Type
    a
  20. Capurro, R.: Medienwirklichkeit versus Bibliothekskultur (1996) 0.00
    6.2708696E-4 = product of:
      0.0025083479 = sum of:
        0.0025083479 = product of:
          0.0050166957 = sum of:
            0.0050166957 = weight(_text_:a in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0050166957 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049223874 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04269026 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a