Search (230 results, page 1 of 12)

0.07947363 = product of:
  0.15894726 = sum of:
    0.15894726 = sum of:
      0.073527 = weight(_text_:p in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.073527 = score(doc=136,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.44943908 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.08542026 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08542026 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13

Source

Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari

0.050654426 = product of:
  0.10130885 = sum of:
    0.10130885 = sum of:
      0.05199144 = weight(_text_:p in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05199144 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
      0.04931741 = weight(_text_:22 in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04931741 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2000 18:41:04

Footnote

Rez. in: Frankfurter Rundschau Nr.23 vom 27.1.1996, S.ZB4 (P. Kruntorad); Spektrum der Wissenschaft 1996, H.3, S.116 (G. Wolf)

0.0367635 = product of:
  0.073527 = sum of:
    0.073527 = product of:
      0.147054 = sum of:
        0.147054 = weight(_text_:p in 7062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.147054 = score(doc=7062,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.89887816 = fieldWeight in 7062, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7062)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Konstruktivismus und Naturerkenntnis. Hrsg.: P. Janich

0.034872673 = product of:
  0.06974535 = sum of:
    0.06974535 = product of:
      0.1394907 = sum of:
        0.1394907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1394907 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2000 19:01:22

0.03249465 = product of:
  0.0649893 = sum of:
    0.0649893 = product of:
      0.1299786 = sum of:
        0.1299786 = weight(_text_:p in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1299786 = score(doc=2469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.79450357 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.032168064 = product of:
  0.06433613 = sum of:
    0.06433613 = product of:
      0.12867226 = sum of:
        0.12867226 = weight(_text_:p in 8932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12867226 = score(doc=8932,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.7865184 = fieldWeight in 8932, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Janich, P.: Die Grenzen der Naturwissenschaft: Erkennen als Handeln

0.032168064 = product of:
  0.06433613 = sum of:
    0.06433613 = product of:
      0.12867226 = sum of:
        0.12867226 = weight(_text_:p in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12867226 = score(doc=1277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.7865184 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Erwiderung auf 'Janich, P.: Informationsbegriff und methodisch-kulturalistische Philosophie' in demselben Heft (S.169-182)

0.031659015 = product of:
  0.06331803 = sum of:
    0.06331803 = sum of:
      0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 2125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03249465 = score(doc=2125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2125)
      0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03082338 = score(doc=2125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2125)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.031659015 = product of:
  0.06331803 = sum of:
    0.06331803 = sum of:
      0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03249465 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
      0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03082338 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.2014 16:55:39

0.031659015 = product of:
  0.06331803 = sum of:
    0.06331803 = sum of:
      0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03249465 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03082338 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.

Date

30. 4.2020 21:03:22

0.03161668 = product of:
  0.06323336 = sum of:
    0.06323336 = product of:
      0.25293344 = sum of:
        0.25293344 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25293344 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3857529 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.030683033 = product of:
  0.061366066 = sum of:
    0.061366066 = sum of:
      0.045954376 = weight(_text_:p in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045954376 = score(doc=2748,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.01541169 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01541169 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045500398 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"This letter considers some main arguments in Professor Bates' article (2008), which is part of our former debate (Bates, 2005,2006; Hjoerland, 2007). Bates (2008) does not write much to restate or enlarge on her theoretical position but is mostly arguing about what she claims Hjorland (2007) ignored or misinterpreted in her two articles. Bates (2008, p. 842) wrote that my arguments did not reflect "a standard of coherence, consistency, and logic that is expected of an argument presented in a scientific journal." My argumentation below will refute this statement. This controversy is whether information should be understood as a subjective phenomenon (alone), as an objective phenomenon (alone), or as a combined objective and a subjective phenomenon ("having it both ways"). Bates (2006) defined "information" (sometimes, e.g., termed "information 1," p. 1042) as an objective phenomenon and "information 2" as a subjective phenomenon. However, sometimes the term "information" is also used as a synonym for "information 2," e.g., "the term information is understood to refer to one or both senses" (p. 1042). Thus, Professor Bates is not consistent in using the terminology that she herself introduces, and confusion in this controversy may be caused by Professor Bates' ambiguity in her use of the term "information." Bates (2006, p. 1033) defined information as an objective phenomenon by joining a definition by Edwin Parker: "Information is the pattern of organization of matter and energy." The argument in Hjoerland (2007) is, by contrast, that information should be understood as a subjective phenomenon all the way down: That neither the objective definition of information nor "having it both ways" is fruitful. This is expressed, for example, by joining Karpatschof's (2000) definition of information as a physical signal relative to a certain release mechanism, which implies that information is not something objective that can be understood independently of an observer or independently of other kinds of mechanism that are programmed to be sensitive to specific attributes of a signal: There are many differences in the world, and each of them is potentially informative in given situations. Regarding Parker's definition, "patterns of organization of matter and energy" are no more than that until they inform somebody about something. When they inform somebody about something, they may be considered information. The following quote is part of the argumentation in Bates (2008): "He contrasts my definition of information as 'observer-independent' with his position that information is 'situational' and adds a list of respected names on the situational side (Hjoerland, 2007, p. 1448). What this sentence, and much of the remainder of his argument, ignores is the fact that my approach accounts for both an observer-independent and a contextual, situational sense of information." Yes, it is correct that I mostly concentrated on refuting Bates' objective definition of information. It is as if Bates expects an overall appraisal of her work rather than providing a specific analysis of the points on which there are disagreements. I see Bates' "having it both ways": a symptom of inconsistence in argumentation.
Bates (2008, p. 843) further writes about her definition of information: "This is the objectivist foundation, the rock bottom minimum of the meaning of information; it informs both articles throughout." This is exactly the focus of my disagreement. If we take a word in a language, it is understood as both being a "pattern of organization of matter and energy" (e.g., a sound) and carrying meaning. But the relation between the physical sign and its meaning is considered an arbitrary relation in linguistics. Any physical material has the potential of carrying any meaning and to inform somebody. The physical stuff in itself is not information until it is used as a sign. An important issue in this debate is whether Bates' examples demonstrate the usefulness of her own position as opposed to mine. Her example about information seeking concerning navigation and how "the very layout of the ship and the design of the bridge promoted the smooth flow of information from the exterior of the ship to the crew and among the crewmembers" (Bates, 2006, pp. 1042-1043) does not justify Bates' definition of information as an objective phenomenon. The design is made for a purpose, and this purpose determines how information should be defined in this context. Bates' view on "curatorial sciences" (2006, p. 1043) is close to Hjorland's suggestions (2000) about "memory institutions," which is based on the subjective understanding of information. However, she does not relate to this proposal, and she does not argue how the objective understanding of information is related to this example. I therefore conclude that Bates' practical examples do not support her objective definition of information, nor do they support her "having it both ways." Finally, I exemplify the consequences of my understanding of information by showing how an archaeologist and a geologist might represent the same stone differently in information systems. Bates (2008, p. 843) writes about this example: "This position is completely consistent with mine." However, this "consistency" was not recognized by Bates until I published my objections and, therefore, this is an indication that my criticism was needed. I certainly share Professor Bates (2008) advice to read her original articles: They contain much important stuff. I just recommend that the reader ignore the parts that argue about information being an objective phenomenon."

Date

22. 3.2009 18:13:27

0.026154507 = product of:
  0.052309014 = sum of:
    0.052309014 = product of:
      0.10461803 = sum of:
        0.10461803 = weight(_text_:22 in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10461803 = score(doc=3952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22
22. 7.2000 19:05:41

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=2491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 2499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=2499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

p

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 6195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=6195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 6195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=3234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02599572 = product of:
  0.05199144 = sum of:
    0.05199144 = product of:
      0.10398288 = sum of:
        0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 7881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10398288 = score(doc=7881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045500398 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 7881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7881)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)