Search (120 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.05
    0.049627617 = product of:
      0.099255234 = sum of:
        0.099255234 = sum of:
          0.062227704 = weight(_text_:c in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.062227704 = score(doc=1352,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037027527 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  2. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.04
    0.04255691 = product of:
      0.08511382 = sum of:
        0.08511382 = sum of:
          0.04191504 = weight(_text_:c in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04191504 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043198783 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  3. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.04
    0.036477353 = product of:
      0.07295471 = sum of:
        0.07295471 = sum of:
          0.03592718 = weight(_text_:c in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03592718 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037027527 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
  4. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.03
    0.030397795 = product of:
      0.06079559 = sum of:
        0.06079559 = sum of:
          0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029939316 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030856274 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.03
    0.030397795 = product of:
      0.06079559 = sum of:
        0.06079559 = sum of:
          0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029939316 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030856274 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics-Why should one use the mean and not the median?-and the incomparability among fields of science because of systematic differences in citation behavior among fields. Can these drawbacks be counteracted by fractionally counting citation weights instead of using whole numbers in the numerators? (a) Fractional citation counts are normalized in terms of the citing sources and thus would take into account differences in citation behavior among fields of science. (b) Differences in the resulting distributions can be tested statistically for their significance at different levels of aggregation. (c) Fractional counting can be generalized to any document set including journals or groups of journals, and thus the significance of differences among both small and large sets can be tested. A list of fractionally counted IFs for 2008 is available online at http:www.leydesdorff.net/weighted_if/weighted_if.xls The between-group variance among the 13 fields of science identified in the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators is no longer statistically significant after this normalization. Although citation behavior differs largely between disciplines, the reflection of these differences in fractionally counted citation distributions can not be used as a reliable instrument for the classification.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07
  6. Schubert, T.; Michels, C.: Placing articles in the large publisher nations : is there a "free lunch" in terms of higher impact? (2013) 0.03
    0.030397795 = product of:
      0.06079559 = sum of:
        0.06079559 = sum of:
          0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029939316 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
          0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030856274 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:45:49
  7. Liu, S.; Chen, C.: ¬The differences between latent topics in abstracts and citation contexts of citing papers (2013) 0.03
    0.030397795 = product of:
      0.06079559 = sum of:
        0.06079559 = sum of:
          0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029939316 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
          0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030856274 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:50:00
  8. Kuan, C.-H.; Liu, J.S.: ¬A new approach for main path analysis : decay in knowledge diffusion (2016) 0.03
    0.030397795 = product of:
      0.06079559 = sum of:
        0.06079559 = sum of:
          0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029939316 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
          0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030856274 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:23:00
  9. Haustein, S.: Scientific interactions and research evaluation : from bibliometrics to Altmetrics (2015) 0.02
    0.021170296 = product of:
      0.04234059 = sum of:
        0.04234059 = product of:
          0.08468118 = sum of:
            0.08468118 = weight(_text_:c in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468118 = score(doc=2981,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  10. Lewandowski, D.; Haustein, S.: What does the German-language information science community cite? (2015) 0.02
    0.021170296 = product of:
      0.04234059 = sum of:
        0.04234059 = product of:
          0.08468118 = sum of:
            0.08468118 = weight(_text_:c in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468118 = score(doc=2987,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.5389696 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  11. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.018513763 = product of:
      0.037027527 = sum of:
        0.037027527 = product of:
          0.07405505 = sum of:
            0.07405505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07405505 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  12. Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015) 0.02
    0.018238677 = product of:
      0.036477353 = sum of:
        0.036477353 = sum of:
          0.01796359 = weight(_text_:c in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01796359 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.114332706 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.018513763 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018513763 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045548957 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Chang, K.-C.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, C,-C.: Threshold effects of the patent H-index in the relationship between patent citations and market value (2015) 0.02
    0.015556926 = product of:
      0.031113852 = sum of:
        0.031113852 = product of:
          0.062227704 = sum of:
            0.062227704 = weight(_text_:c in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062227704 = score(doc=2344,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Malesios, C.: Some variations on the standard theoretical models for the h-index : a comparative analysis (2015) 0.01
    0.014819207 = product of:
      0.029638413 = sum of:
        0.029638413 = product of:
          0.059276827 = sum of:
            0.059276827 = weight(_text_:c in 2267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059276827 = score(doc=2267,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 2267, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Various mathematical models have been proposed in the recent literature for estimating the h-index using measures such as number of articles (P) and citations received (C). These models have been previously empirically tested assuming a mathematical model and predetermining the models' parameter values at some fixed constant. The present study, from a statistical modeling viewpoint, investigates alternative distributions commonly used for this type of point data. The study shows that the typical assumptions for the parameters of the h-index mathematical models in such representations are not always realistic, with more suitable specifications being favorable. Prediction of the h-index is also demonstrated.
  15. Chen, C.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.; Hou, J.: ¬The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters : a multiple-perspective cocitation analysis (2010) 0.01
    0.012702176 = product of:
      0.025404353 = sum of:
        0.025404353 = product of:
          0.050808705 = sum of:
            0.050808705 = weight(_text_:c in 3591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050808705 = score(doc=3591,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 3591, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis method is introduced for characterizing and interpreting the structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters. The method facilitates analytic and sense making tasks by integrating network visualization, spectral clustering, automatic cluster labeling, and text summarization. Cocitation networks are decomposed into cocitation clusters. The interpretation of these clusters is augmented by automatic cluster labeling and summarization. The method focuses on the interrelations between a cocitation cluster's members and their citers. The generic method is applied to a three-part analysis of the field of information science as defined by 12 journals published between 1996 and 2008: (a) a comparative author cocitation analysis (ACA), (b) a progressive ACA of a time series of cocitation networks, and (c) a progressive document cocitation analysis (DCA). Results show that the multiple-perspective method increases the interpretability and accountability of both ACA and DCA networks.
  16. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01
    0.01234251 = product of:
      0.02468502 = sum of:
        0.02468502 = product of:
          0.04937004 = sum of:
            0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04937004 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  17. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.01234251 = product of:
      0.02468502 = sum of:
        0.02468502 = product of:
          0.04937004 = sum of:
            0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04937004 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  18. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.01234251 = product of:
      0.02468502 = sum of:
        0.02468502 = product of:
          0.04937004 = sum of:
            0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04937004 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
  19. Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011) 0.01
    0.011975727 = product of:
      0.023951454 = sum of:
        0.023951454 = product of:
          0.04790291 = sum of:
            0.04790291 = weight(_text_:c in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04790291 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The approach based on "thermodynamic" considerations that can quantify research performance using an exergy term defined as X = iC, where i is the impact and C is the number of citations is now extended to cases where fractionalized counting of citations is used instead of integer counting.
  20. Vogler, E.; Schindler, C.; Botte, A.; Rittberger, M.: Are altmetrics effective in transdisciplinary research fields? : altmetric coverage of outputs in educational research (2017) 0.01
    0.011975727 = product of:
      0.023951454 = sum of:
        0.023951454 = product of:
          0.04790291 = sum of:
            0.04790291 = weight(_text_:c in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04790291 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 114
  • d 6
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 119
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…