-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.05
0.054257866 = product of:
0.10851573 = sum of:
0.10851573 = product of:
0.43406293 = sum of:
0.43406293 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.43406293 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38616458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.05
0.048147637 = sum of:
0.03617191 = product of:
0.14468764 = sum of:
0.14468764 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14468764 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38616458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.011975727 = product of:
0.023951454 = sum of:
0.023951454 = weight(_text_:c in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023951454 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.02
0.022607444 = product of:
0.045214888 = sum of:
0.045214888 = product of:
0.18085955 = sum of:
0.18085955 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18085955 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38616458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.02
0.022607444 = product of:
0.045214888 = sum of:
0.045214888 = product of:
0.18085955 = sum of:
0.18085955 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18085955 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38616458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.02
0.022607444 = product of:
0.045214888 = sum of:
0.045214888 = product of:
0.18085955 = sum of:
0.18085955 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18085955 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38616458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012)
0.01
0.01234251 = product of:
0.02468502 = sum of:
0.02468502 = product of:
0.04937004 = sum of:
0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04937004 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 9.2012 19:43:22
-
Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011)
0.01
0.01090934 = product of:
0.02181868 = sum of:
0.02181868 = product of:
0.04363736 = sum of:
0.04363736 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04363736 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 20:40:31
-
Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013)
0.01
0.009256882 = product of:
0.018513763 = sum of:
0.018513763 = product of:
0.037027527 = sum of:
0.037027527 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037027527 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 2.2015 9:22:39
-
Geisriegler, E.: Enriching electronic texts with semantic metadata : a use case for the historical Newspaper Collection ANNO (Austrian Newspapers Online) of the Austrian National Libraryhek (2012)
0.01
0.0077140685 = product of:
0.015428137 = sum of:
0.015428137 = product of:
0.030856274 = sum of:
0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030856274 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 2.2013 18:00:22
-
Effenberger, C.: ¬Die Dewey Dezimalklassifikation als Erschließungsinstrument : optimiertes Retrieval durch eine Versionierung der DDC (2011)
0.01
0.007484829 = product of:
0.014969658 = sum of:
0.014969658 = product of:
0.029939316 = sum of:
0.029939316 = weight(_text_:c in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029939316 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017)
0.01
0.006171255 = product of:
0.01234251 = sum of:
0.01234251 = product of:
0.02468502 = sum of:
0.02468502 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02468502 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.01
0.00523938 = product of:
0.01047876 = sum of:
0.01047876 = product of:
0.02095752 = sum of:
0.02095752 = weight(_text_:c in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02095752 = score(doc=1077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
-
Ammann, A.: Klassifikation dynamischer Wissensräume : multifaktorielle Wechselbeziehungen zur Generierung und Gestaltung konstellativer dynamischer und mehrdimensionaler Wissensräume mit einem Fokus der Anwendung in der Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde am Beispiel der enossalen Implantologie (2012)
0.00
0.0044908975 = product of:
0.008981795 = sum of:
0.008981795 = product of:
0.01796359 = sum of:
0.01796359 = weight(_text_:c in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01796359 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.045548957 = queryNorm
0.114332706 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Teil C erfolgt zunächst auszugsweise die Beschreibung bestehender Dokumenten-Analysesysteme für die Bildung von aufgaben- und problemorientierten Wissensräumen, um dann in der Ableitung die Wissensmodelle nach dem Molekül- und Legoprinzip vorzustellen. Mit einer Diskussion zur gesamten Thematik und den Ergebnissen mit den sich aus der Arbeit ergebenden Thesen schließt diese Arbeit, die durch einen Rückblick, einen Einblick und einen Ausblick den Diskurs um die Genese einer neuen Ordnung des Wissens ein wenig beleben kann. Es ist dabei verständlich, dass diese Arbeit eine besondere Beziehung zur Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde hat, da es die berufliche Wissenswelt ist, in der ich lebe.
