Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.08
    0.08012432 = product of:
      0.16024864 = sum of:
        0.0392755 = weight(_text_:j in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0392755 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
        0.12097314 = weight(_text_:van in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12097314 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.49290553 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
  2. Knautz, K.; Dröge, E.; Finkelmeyer, S.; Guschauski, D.; Juchem, K.; Krzmyk, C.; Miskovic, D.; Schiefer, J.; Sen, E.; Verbina, J.; Werner, N.; Stock, W.G.: Indexieren von Emotionen bei Videos (2010) 0.03
    0.03112273 = product of:
      0.06224546 = sum of:
        0.041657962 = weight(_text_:j in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041657962 = score(doc=3637,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
        0.020587496 = product of:
          0.041174993 = sum of:
            0.041174993 = weight(_text_:der in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041174993 = score(doc=3637,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044010527 = queryNorm
                0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenstand der empirischen Forschungsarbeit sind dargestellte wie empfundene Gefühle bei Videos. Sind Nutzer in der Lage, solche Gefühle derart konsistent zu erschließen, dass man deren Angaben für ein emotionales Videoretrieval gebrauchen kann? Wir arbeiten mit einem kontrollierten Vokabular für neun tionen (Liebe, Freude, Spaß, Überraschung, Sehnsucht, Trauer, Ärger, Ekel und Angst), einem Schieberegler zur Einstellung der jeweiligen Intensität des Gefühls und mit dem Ansatz der broad Folksonomy, lassen also unterschiedliche Nutzer die Videos taggen. Versuchspersonen bekamen insgesamt 20 Videos (bearbeitete Filme aus YouTube) vorgelegt, deren Emotionen sie indexieren sollten. Wir erhielten Angaben von 776 Probanden und entsprechend 279.360 Schiebereglereinstellungen. Die Konsistenz der Nutzervoten ist sehr hoch; die Tags führen zu stabilen Verteilungen der Emotionen für die einzelnen Videos. Die endgültige Form der Verteilungen wird schon bei relativ wenigen Nutzern (unter 100) erreicht. Es ist möglich, im Sinne der Power Tags die jeweils für ein Dokument zentralen Gefühle (soweit überhaupt vorhanden) zu separieren und für das emotionale Information Retrieval (EmIR) aufzubereiten.
  3. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.02
    0.023672543 = product of:
      0.047345087 = sum of:
        0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029456628 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
        0.017888457 = product of:
          0.035776913 = sum of:
            0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035776913 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044010527 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987) 0.02
    0.01963775 = product of:
      0.078551 = sum of:
        0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078551 = score(doc=2738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Hicks, C.; Rush, J.; Strong, S.: Content analysis (1977) 0.02
    0.01963775 = product of:
      0.078551 = sum of:
        0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 7514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078551 = score(doc=7514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 7514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7514)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994) 0.02
    0.01963775 = product of:
      0.078551 = sum of:
        0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078551 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Klüver, J.; Kier, R.: Rekonstruktion und Verstehen : ein Computer-Programm zur Interpretation sozialwissenschaftlicher Texte (1994) 0.02
    0.01963775 = product of:
      0.078551 = sum of:
        0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 6830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078551 = score(doc=6830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6830)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Mai, J.-E.: Deconstructing the indexing process (2000) 0.02
    0.01963775 = product of:
      0.078551 = sum of:
        0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078551 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Krause, J.: Principles of content analysis for information retrieval systems : an overview (1996) 0.02
    0.017183032 = product of:
      0.06873213 = sum of:
        0.06873213 = weight(_text_:j in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06873213 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.02
    0.016778158 = product of:
      0.06711263 = sum of:
        0.06711263 = sum of:
          0.019410077 = weight(_text_:der in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019410077 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044010527 = queryNorm
              0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.047702555 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047702555 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044010527 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  11. Austin, J.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on user's value criteria. Pt.1 (1983) 0.01
    0.014728314 = product of:
      0.058913257 = sum of:
        0.058913257 = weight(_text_:j in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058913257 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Wyllie, J.: Concept indexing : the world beyond the windows (1990) 0.01
    0.014728314 = product of:
      0.058913257 = sum of:
        0.058913257 = weight(_text_:j in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058913257 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Laffal, J.: ¬A concept analysis of Jonathan Swift's 'Tale of a tub' and 'Gulliver's travels' (1995) 0.01
    0.014728314 = product of:
      0.058913257 = sum of:
        0.058913257 = weight(_text_:j in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058913257 = score(doc=6362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Vieira, L.: Modèle d'analyse pur une classification du document iconographique (1999) 0.01
    0.012273594 = product of:
      0.049094375 = sum of:
        0.049094375 = weight(_text_:j in 6320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049094375 = score(doc=6320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 6320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6320)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
  15. Andersen, J.: ¬The concept of genre : when, how, and why? (2001) 0.01
    0.009818875 = product of:
      0.0392755 = sum of:
        0.0392755 = weight(_text_:j in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0392755 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. From information to knowledge : conceptual and content analysis by computer (1995) 0.01
    0.008678742 = product of:
      0.034714967 = sum of:
        0.034714967 = weight(_text_:j in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034714967 = score(doc=5392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    SCHMIDT, K.M.: Concepts - content - meaning: an introduction; DUCHASTEL, J. et al.: The SACAO project: using computation toward textual data analysis; PAQUIN, L.-C. u. L. DUPUY: An approach to expertise transfer: computer-assisted text analysis; HOGENRAAD, R., Y. BESTGEN u. J.-L. NYSTEN: Terrorist rhetoric: texture and architecture; MOHLER, P.P.: On the interaction between reading and computing: an interpretative approach to content analysis; LANCASHIRE, I.: Computer tools for cognitive stylistics; MERGENTHALER, E.: An outline of knowledge based text analysis; NAMENWIRTH, J.Z.: Ideography in computer-aided content analysis; WEBER, R.P. u. J.Z. Namenwirth: Content-analytic indicators: a self-critique; McKINNON, A.: Optimizing the aberrant frequency word technique; ROSATI, R.: Factor analysis in classical archaeology: export patterns of Attic pottery trade; PETRILLO, P.S.: Old and new worlds: ancient coinage and modern technology; DARANYI, S., S. MARJAI u.a.: Caryatids and the measurement of semiosis in architecture; ZARRI, G.P.: Intelligent information retrieval: an application in the field of historical biographical data; BOUCHARD, G., R. ROY u.a.: Computers and genealogy: from family reconstitution to population reconstruction; DEMÉLAS-BOHY, M.-D. u. M. RENAUD: Instability, networks and political parties: a political history expert system prototype; DARANYI, S., A. ABRANYI u. G. KOVACS: Knowledge extraction from ethnopoetic texts by multivariate statistical methods; FRAUTSCHI, R.L.: Measures of narrative voice in French prose fiction applied to textual samples from the enlightenment to the twentieth century; DANNENBERG, R. u.a.: A project in computer music: the musician's workbench
  17. Mai, J.-E.: Analysis in indexing : document and domain centered approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.008591516 = product of:
      0.034366064 = sum of:
        0.034366064 = weight(_text_:j in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034366064 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Diao, J.: Conceptualizations of catalogers' judgment through content analysis : a preliminary investigation (2018) 0.01
    0.008591516 = product of:
      0.034366064 = sum of:
        0.034366064 = weight(_text_:j in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034366064 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.01
    0.007453524 = product of:
      0.029814096 = sum of:
        0.029814096 = product of:
          0.059628192 = sum of:
            0.059628192 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059628192 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044010527 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  20. Caldera-Serrano, J.: Thematic description of audio-visual information on television (2010) 0.01
    0.007364157 = product of:
      0.029456628 = sum of:
        0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 3953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029456628 = score(doc=3953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044010527 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3953)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 21
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 33
  • m 7
  • x 5
  • el 2
  • d 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…