-
Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.08
0.08012432 = product of:
0.16024864 = sum of:
0.0392755 = weight(_text_:j in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392755 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.12097314 = weight(_text_:van in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12097314 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.49290553 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.03
0.02977321 = product of:
0.05954642 = sum of:
0.041657962 = weight(_text_:j in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041657962 = score(doc=2421,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.017888457 = product of:
0.035776913 = sum of:
0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035776913 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.02
0.023672543 = product of:
0.047345087 = sum of:
0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029456628 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.017888457 = product of:
0.035776913 = sum of:
0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035776913 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.02
0.019727118 = product of:
0.039454237 = sum of:
0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024547188 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.014907048 = product of:
0.029814096 = sum of:
0.029814096 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029814096 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987)
0.02
0.01963775 = product of:
0.078551 = sum of:
0.078551 = weight(_text_:j in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078551 = score(doc=2738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002)
0.02
0.017183032 = product of:
0.06873213 = sum of:
0.06873213 = weight(_text_:j in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06873213 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Reischer, J.; Lottes, D.; Meier, F.; Stirner, M.: Evaluation von Summarizing-Systemen : Kommerzielle und freie Systeme im Vergleich (2010)
0.01
0.013885987 = product of:
0.055543948 = sum of:
0.055543948 = weight(_text_:j in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055543948 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.01
0.009818875 = product of:
0.0392755 = sum of:
0.0392755 = weight(_text_:j in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392755 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.01
0.009818875 = product of:
0.0392755 = sum of:
0.0392755 = weight(_text_:j in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392755 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.01
0.007453524 = product of:
0.029814096 = sum of:
0.029814096 = product of:
0.059628192 = sum of:
0.059628192 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059628192 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009)
0.01
0.007364157 = product of:
0.029456628 = sum of:
0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029456628 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Bienert, F.: Probleme der Annotation in der Öffentlichen Bibliothek (1971)
0.01
0.0068624984 = product of:
0.027449993 = sum of:
0.027449993 = product of:
0.054899987 = sum of:
0.054899987 = weight(_text_:der in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054899987 = score(doc=82,freq=4.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Montesi, M.; Mackenzie Owen, J.: Revision of author abstracts : how it is carried out by LISA editors (2007)
0.01
0.006136797 = product of:
0.024547188 = sum of:
0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024547188 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: ¬The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts (2007)
0.01
0.006136797 = product of:
0.024547188 = sum of:
0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 1325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024547188 = score(doc=1325,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1325, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1325)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008)
0.01
0.006136797 = product of:
0.024547188 = sum of:
0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024547188 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Revising and polishing a structured abstract : is it worth the time and effort? (2008)
0.01
0.006136797 = product of:
0.024547188 = sum of:
0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024547188 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983)
0.01
0.0060046865 = product of:
0.024018746 = sum of:
0.024018746 = product of:
0.04803749 = sum of:
0.04803749 = weight(_text_:der in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04803749 = score(doc=450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.0059628193 = product of:
0.023851277 = sum of:
0.023851277 = product of:
0.047702555 = sum of:
0.047702555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047702555 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Neumann-Duscha, I.: Über die Qualität von Referaten (1990)
0.01
0.0054252814 = product of:
0.021701125 = sum of:
0.021701125 = product of:
0.04340225 = sum of:
0.04340225 = weight(_text_:der in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04340225 = score(doc=8593,freq=10.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Die Qualität der Dokumentenanlyse entscheidet über die Wirksamkeit eines Dokumentationsvorhabens, denn Auswahl und Darstellung von Informationselementen bilden die Grundlage zum Wiederfinden des dokumentierten Wissens. Kurzreferate informieren über den Inhalt einer Veröffentlichung. Verschiedene Typen von Inhaltsangaben werden entsprechend der DIN 1426 vorgestellt, Vorschriften und Anweisungen an Referate werden analysiert und die Bewertung der Qualität von Kurzreferaten diskutiert. Das zunehmende Wissen über den Aufbau und das Information Retrieval von Faktendatenbanken führt zu der Schlußfolgerung, daß über die verbale Kurzdarstellung des Dokumenteninhalts hinaus Fakten extrahiert und in speziellen Datenbanken gespeichert werden sollten
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaus. 1990, H.46, S.53-70
-
Hahn, U.: Abstracting - Textzusammenfassung (2023)
0.01
0.005146874 = product of:
0.020587496 = sum of:
0.020587496 = product of:
0.041174993 = sum of:
0.041174993 = weight(_text_:der in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041174993 = score(doc=786,freq=16.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Abstracts (hier als Sammelbegriff für jegliche Form meist schriftlicher Zusammenfassungen verstanden) beruhen auf der inhaltlichen Informationsverdichtung (Kondensierung) von längeren Quelltexten (etwa Zeitungs- oder Zeitschriftenartikel). Geht man von der Menge aller Aussagen eines Originaldokumentes (auch als Volltext bezeichnet) aus, soll ein Abstract - abhängig vom gewünschten Verdichtungsgrad - nur die wichtigsten Aussagen des Volltextes oder Generalisierungen davon in redundanzfreier, grammatikalisch korrekter, textuell kohärenter und gut lesbarer Form enthalten. Durch die Verdichtung - so die zentrale informationswissenschaftliche Annahme - gewinnt der Nutzer Übersicht über die in einem (oder mehreren) Dokument(en) behandelten Themen mit wesentlich geringerem (Zeit-)Aufwand als durch die Lektüre des Originaltextes. Es ist dabei unstrittig, dass jede Form der Kondensierung zu Informationsverlusten führt. Folglich gilt es, ein Optimum an Zeitgewinn und Informationsverlust anzustreben. Abstracting, der Prozess der Erstellung von Abstracts, selbst kann als Spezialisierung der allgemeineren Textzusammenfassung (TZF) aufgefasst werden, fokussiert jedoch primär auf Fach- und Sachtexte.
- Source
- Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
