-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.13
0.12672135 = product of:
0.2534427 = sum of:
0.21170299 = weight(_text_:van in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21170299 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.86258465 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.041739732 = product of:
0.083479464 = sum of:
0.083479464 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083479464 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Fleet, C. van: Opening the black box of "relevance work" : a domain analysis (2012)
0.07
0.06779509 = product of:
0.13559018 = sum of:
0.1283114 = weight(_text_:van in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1283114 = score(doc=247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.5228053 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.0072787786 = product of:
0.014557557 = sum of:
0.014557557 = weight(_text_:der in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014557557 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A fast hierarchic clustering algorithm (1970)
0.06
0.06048657 = product of:
0.24194628 = sum of:
0.24194628 = weight(_text_:van in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24194628 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.98581105 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.06
0.05523593 = product of:
0.11047186 = sum of:
0.06873213 = weight(_text_:j in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06873213 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.041739732 = product of:
0.083479464 = sum of:
0.083479464 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083479464 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003)
0.05
0.054309156 = product of:
0.10861831 = sum of:
0.090729855 = weight(_text_:van in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090729855 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.36967915 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.017888457 = product of:
0.035776913 = sum of:
0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035776913 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:36
-
Wiggers, G.; Verberne, S.; Loon, W. van; Zwenne, G.-J.: Bibliometric-enhanced legal information retrieval : combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance (2023)
0.05
0.0500777 = product of:
0.1001554 = sum of:
0.024547188 = weight(_text_:j in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024547188 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.07560821 = weight(_text_:van in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07560821 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.30806595 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023)
0.05
0.049004316 = product of:
0.09800863 = sum of:
0.090729855 = weight(_text_:van in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090729855 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.36967915 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
0.0072787786 = product of:
0.014557557 = sum of:
0.014557557 = weight(_text_:der in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014557557 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Sembok, T.M.T.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: IMAGING: a relevant feedback retrieval with nearest neighbour clusters (1994)
0.03
0.030243285 = product of:
0.12097314 = sum of:
0.12097314 = weight(_text_:van in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12097314 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.49290553 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.028182205 = product of:
0.11272882 = sum of:
0.11272882 = sum of:
0.041174993 = weight(_text_:der in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041174993 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.07155383 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07155383 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag enthält eine Darstellung zur Frage der Konzeption von Rankingalgorithmen auf Grundlage gewichteter Indexierung mittels statistischer Verfahren.
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.02
0.023672543 = product of:
0.047345087 = sum of:
0.029456628 = weight(_text_:j in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029456628 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.017888457 = product of:
0.035776913 = sum of:
0.035776913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035776913 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
-
Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003)
0.02
0.02318772 = product of:
0.04637544 = sum of:
0.034366064 = weight(_text_:j in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034366064 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.012009373 = product of:
0.024018746 = sum of:
0.024018746 = weight(_text_:der in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024018746 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Bekanntlich führen Suchmaschinen wie Google &Co. beider Auflistung der Suchergebnisse ein "Ranking" nach "Relevanz" durch, d.h. die Dokumente werden in absteigender Reihenfolge entsprechend ihrer Erfüllung von Relevanzkriterien ausgeben. In Online-Katalogen (OPACs) ist derlei noch nicht allgemein übliche Praxis, doch bietet etwa das im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund eingesetzte System Aleph 500 tatsächlich eine solche Ranking-Option an (die im Verbundkatalog auch implementiert ist). Bislang liegen allerdings kaum Informationen zur Funktionsweise dieses Features, insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf eine Hilfestellung für Benutzer, vor. Daher möchten wir mit diesem Beitrag versuchen, den in unserem Verbund bestehenden Informationsstand zum Thema "Relevance Ranking" zu erweitern. Sowohl die Verwendung einer Ranking-Option in OPACs generell als auch die sich unter Aleph 500 konkret bietenden Möglichkeiten sollen im folgenden näher betrachtet werden.
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
-
Ruthven, T.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, K.van: Incorporating user research behavior into relevance feedback (2003)
0.02
0.018902052 = product of:
0.07560821 = sum of:
0.07560821 = weight(_text_:van in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07560821 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24542865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.30806595 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Ruthven, Mounia, and van Rijsbergen rank and select terms for query expansion using information gathered on searcher evaluation behavior. Using the TREC Financial Times and Los Angeles Times collections and search topics from TREC-6 placed in simulated work situations, six student subjects each preformed three searches on an experimental system and three on a control system with instructions to search by natural language expression in any way they found comfortable. Searching was analyzed for behavior differences between experimental and control situations, and for effectiveness and perceptions. In three experiments paired t-tests were the analysis tool with controls being a no relevance feedback system, a standard ranking for automatic expansion system, and a standard ranking for interactive expansion while the experimental systems based ranking upon user information on temporal relevance and partial relevance. Two further experiments compare using user behavior (number assessed relevant and similarity of relevant documents) to choose a query expansion technique against a non-selective technique and finally the effect of providing the user with knowledge of the process. When partial relevance data and time of assessment data are incorporated in term ranking more relevant documents were recovered in fewer iterations, however retrieval effectiveness overall was not improved. The subjects, none-the-less, rated the suggested terms as more useful and used them more heavily. Explanations of what the feedback techniques were doing led to higher use of the techniques.
-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.02
0.017789142 = product of:
0.07115657 = sum of:
0.07115657 = sum of:
0.029416837 = weight(_text_:der in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029416837 = score(doc=3276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.098309256 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.041739732 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041739732 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
-
Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001)
0.02
0.017183032 = product of:
0.06873213 = sum of:
0.06873213 = weight(_text_:j in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06873213 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Savoy, J.; Ndarugendamwo, M.; Vrajitoru, D.: Report on the TREC-4 experiment : combining probabilistic and vector-space schemes (1996)
0.01
0.014728314 = product of:
0.058913257 = sum of:
0.058913257 = weight(_text_:j in 7574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058913257 = score(doc=7574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7574)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996)
0.01
0.014728314 = product of:
0.058913257 = sum of:
0.058913257 = weight(_text_:j in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058913257 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: ¬The hw-rank : an h-index variant for ranking web pages (2015)
0.01
0.012273594 = product of:
0.049094375 = sum of:
0.049094375 = weight(_text_:j in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049094375 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015)
0.01
0.012273594 = product of:
0.049094375 = sum of:
0.049094375 = weight(_text_:j in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049094375 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007)
0.01
0.012150239 = product of:
0.048600957 = sum of:
0.048600957 = weight(_text_:j in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048600957 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1398433 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.01
0.011925639 = product of:
0.047702555 = sum of:
0.047702555 = product of:
0.09540511 = sum of:
0.09540511 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09540511 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15411738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044010527 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
