-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.02
0.021576365 = product of:
0.04315273 = sum of:
0.04315273 = product of:
0.08630546 = sum of:
0.08630546 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08630546 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
-
Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996)
0.02
0.017436337 = product of:
0.034872673 = sum of:
0.034872673 = product of:
0.06974535 = sum of:
0.06974535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06974535 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2006 14:22:21
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.02
0.01541169 = product of:
0.03082338 = sum of:
0.03082338 = product of:
0.06164676 = sum of:
0.06164676 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06164676 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965)
0.01
0.01299786 = product of:
0.02599572 = sum of:
0.02599572 = product of:
0.05199144 = sum of:
0.05199144 = weight(_text_:p in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05199144 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Classification research. Proc. 2nd Int. Study Conf. ... Elsinore, 14.-18.8.1964. Ed.: P. Atherton
-
Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998)
0.01
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = product of:
0.04315273 = sum of:
0.04315273 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315273 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.01
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = product of:
0.04315273 = sum of:
0.04315273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315273 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = product of:
0.04315273 = sum of:
0.04315273 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315273 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- P
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.01
0.009247013 = product of:
0.018494027 = sum of:
0.018494027 = product of:
0.036988053 = sum of:
0.036988053 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036988053 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996)
0.01
0.008123662 = product of:
0.016247325 = sum of:
0.016247325 = product of:
0.03249465 = sum of:
0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03249465 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
-
Relationships in the organization of knowledge (2001)
0.01
0.008123662 = product of:
0.016247325 = sum of:
0.016247325 = product of:
0.03249465 = sum of:
0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03249465 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: GREEN, R.: Relationships in the organization of knowledge: an overview; TILLETT, B.: Bibliographic relationships; CLARKE, S.G.D.: Thesaural relationships; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms; HUDON, M.: Relationships in multilingual thesauri; BODENREIDER, O. u. C.A. BEAN: Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain; BEGHTOL, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning; BEAN, C.A. u. R. GREEN: Relevance relationships; EL-HOSHY, L.M.: Relationships in Library of Congress Subject Headings; MOLHOLT, P.: The Art and Architecture Thesaurus: controlling relationships through rules and structure; NELSON, S.J. u.a.: Relationships in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH); NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Lateral relationships in multicultural, mulrilingual databases in the spiritual and religous domains: the OM information service; SATIJA, M.P.: Relationships in Ranganathan's Colon classification; MITCHELL, J.S.: Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification System
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Tiberi, M.; De Santis, B.; Plini, P.: Relational semantics in thesauri : an overview and some remarks at theoretical and practical levels (2007)
0.01
0.008123662 = product of:
0.016247325 = sum of:
0.016247325 = product of:
0.03249465 = sum of:
0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03249465 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021)
0.01
0.007705845 = product of:
0.01541169 = sum of:
0.01541169 = product of:
0.03082338 = sum of:
0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03082338 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2021 14:24:32
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification (1985)
0.01
0.0068931566 = product of:
0.013786313 = sum of:
0.013786313 = product of:
0.027572626 = sum of:
0.027572626 = weight(_text_:p in 3642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027572626 = score(doc=3642,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.16853966 = fieldWeight in 3642, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The basic fallacy of mechanised information retrieval systems seems to be the often unconscious but apparently implied assumption that the machine can inject meaning into a group of juxtaposed terms although no methods of conceptual analysis and re-synthesis have been programmed (p. 203). As an example, he suggests considering the slight but vital differences in the meaning of the word "of" in selected examples: swarm of bees house of the mayor House of Lords spectrum of the sun basket of fish meeting of councillors cooking of meat book of the film Farradane's distinctive contribution is his matrix of basic relationships. The rows concern time and memory, in degree of happenstance: coincidentally, occasionally, or always. The columns represent degree of the "powers of discrimination": occurring together, linked by common elements only, or standing alone. To make these relationships easily managed, he used symbols for each of the nine kinds - "symbols found an every typewriter": /O (Theta) /* /; /= /+ /( /) /_ /: Farradane has maintained his basic insights to the present day. Though he has gone an to do other kinds of research in classification, his work indicates that he still believes that "the primary task ... is that of establishing satisfactory and enduring principles of subject analysis, or classification" (p. 208).
-
Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006)
0.01
0.0068931566 = product of:
0.013786313 = sum of:
0.013786313 = product of:
0.027572626 = sum of:
0.027572626 = weight(_text_:p in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027572626 = score(doc=1978,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.16853966 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
Linguists in the structuralist tradition (e.g., Lyons, 1977; Saussure, 1959) have asserted that concepts cannot be defined on their own but only in relation to other concepts. Semantic relations appear to reflect a logical structure in the fundamental nature of thought (Caplan & Herrmann, 1993). Green, Bean, and Myaeng (2002) noted that semantic relations play a critical role in how we represent knowledge psychologically, linguistically, and computationally, and that many systems of knowledge representation start with a basic distinction between entities and relations. Green (2001, p. 3) said that "relationships are involved as we combine simple entities to form more complex entities, as we compare entities, as we group entities, as one entity performs a process on another entity, and so forth. Indeed, many things that we might initially regard as basic and elemental are revealed upon further examination to involve internal structure, or in other words, internal relationships." Concepts and relations are often expressed in language and text. Language is used not just for communicating concepts and relations, but also for representing, storing, and reasoning with concepts and relations. We shall examine the nature of semantic relations from a linguistic and psychological perspective, with an emphasis on relations expressed in text. The usefulness of semantic relations in information science, especially in ontology construction, information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and text summarization is discussed. Research and development in information science have focused on concepts and terms, but the focus will increasingly shift to the identification, processing, and management of relations to achieve greater effectiveness and refinement in information science techniques. Previous chapters in ARIST on natural language processing (Chowdhury, 2003), text mining (Trybula, 1999), information retrieval and the philosophy of language (Blair, 2003), and query expansion (Efthimiadis, 1996) provide a background for this discussion, as semantic relations are an important part of these applications.
-
¬The LCSH century : One hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000)
0.01
0.00649893 = product of:
0.01299786 = sum of:
0.01299786 = product of:
0.02599572 = sum of:
0.02599572 = weight(_text_:p in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02599572 = score(doc=1224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: BACKGROUND: Alva T STONE: The LCSH Century: A Brief History of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and Introduction to the Centennial Essays - THEORY AND PRINCIPLES: Elaine SVENONIUS: LCSH: Semantics, Syntax and Specificity; Heidi Lee HOERMAN u. Kevin A. FURNISS: Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA: Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings System; Hope A. OLSON: Difference, Culture and Change:The Untapped Potential of LCSH - ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: Pauline Atherton COCHRANE: Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs Revisited-What Progress Has Been Made? What Issues Still Remain?; Gregory WOOL: Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters; Stephen HEARN: Machine-Assisted Validation of LC Subject Headings: Implications for Authority File Structure - SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVES: Thomas MANN: Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings; Louisa J. KREIDER: LCSH Works! Subject Searching Effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the Growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings Through Cooperation; Harriette HEMMASI u J. Bradford YOUNG: LCSH for Music: Historical and Empirical Perspectives; Joseph MILLER u. Patricia KUHR: LCSH and Periodical Indexing: Adoption vs. Adaptation; David P MILLER: Out from Under: Form/Genre Access in LCSH - WORLD VIEW: Magda HEINER-FREILING: Survey on Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies; Andrew MacEWAN: Crossing Language Barriers in Europe: Linking LCSH to Other Subject Heading Languages; Alvaro QUIJANO-SOLIS u.a.: Automated Authority Files of Spanish-Language Subject Headings - FUTURE PROSPECTS: Lois Mai CHAN u. Theodora HODGES: Entering the Millennium: a new century for LCSH
-
¬The LCSH century : One hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000)
0.01
0.00649893 = product of:
0.01299786 = sum of:
0.01299786 = product of:
0.02599572 = sum of:
0.02599572 = weight(_text_:p in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02599572 = score(doc=5366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: BACKGROUND: Alva T STONE: The LCSH Century: A Brief History of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and Introduction to the Centennial Essays - THEORY AND PRINCIPLES: Elaine SVENONIUS: LCSH: Semantics, Syntax and Specificity; Heidi Lee HOERMAN u. Kevin A. FURNISS: Turning Practice into Principles: A Comparison of the IFLA: Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the Principles Underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings System; Hope A. OLSON: Difference, Culture and Change:The Untapped Potential of LCSH - ONLINE ENVIRONMENT: Pauline Atherton COCHRANE: Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs Revisited-What Progress Has Been Made? What Issues Still Remain?; Gregory WOOL: Filing and Precoordination: How Subject Headings Are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why It Matters; Stephen HEARN: Machine-Assisted Validation of LC Subject Headings: Implications for Authority File Structure - SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVES: Thomas MANN: Teaching Library of Congress Subject Headings; Louisa J. KREIDER: LCSH Works! Subject Searching Effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the Growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings Through Cooperation; Harriette HEMMASI u J. Bradford YOUNG: LCSH for Music: Historical and Empirical Perspectives; Joseph MILLER u. Patricia KUHR: LCSH and Periodical Indexing: Adoption vs. Adaptation; David P MILLER: Out from Under: Form/Genre Access in LCSH - WORLD VIEW: Magda HEINER-FREILING: Survey on Subject Heading Languages Used in National Libraries and Bibliographies; Andrew MacEWAN: Crossing Language Barriers in Europe: Linking LCSH to Other Subject Heading Languages; Alvaro QUIJANO-SOLIS u.a.: Automated Authority Files of Spanish-Language Subject Headings - FUTURE PROSPECTS: Lois Mai CHAN u. Theodora HODGES: Entering the Millennium: a new century for LCSH
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.01
0.0053940914 = product of:
0.010788183 = sum of:
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021576365 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
