-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.07
0.07248098 = product of:
0.14496195 = sum of:
0.14496195 = sum of:
0.061784692 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061784692 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.008135883 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008135883 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.07504137 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07504137 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.03
0.030231323 = product of:
0.060462646 = sum of:
0.060462646 = sum of:
0.02316926 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02316926 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.009152869 = weight(_text_:a in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009152869 = score(doc=994,freq=18.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.028140513 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028140513 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Type
- a
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.03
0.02906596 = product of:
0.05813192 = sum of:
0.05813192 = sum of:
0.02316926 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02316926 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.006822146 = weight(_text_:a in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006822146 = score(doc=2064,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.028140513 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028140513 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper attempts to provide an alternative method for measuring the importance of scientific papers based on the Google's PageRank. The method is a meaningful extension of the common integer counting of citations and is then experimented for bringing PageRank to the citation analysis in a large citation network. It offers a more integrated picture of the publications' influence in a specific field. We firstly calculate the PageRanks of scientific papers. The distributional characteristics and comparison with the traditionally used number of citations are then analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the PageRank is implemented in the evaluation of research influence for several countries in the field of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology during the time period of 2000-2005. Finally, some advantages of bringing PageRank to the citation analysis are concluded.
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Type
- a
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027725752 = product of:
0.055451505 = sum of:
0.055451505 = product of:
0.08317725 = sum of:
0.008135883 = weight(_text_:a in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008135883 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.07504137 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07504137 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Type
- a
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.023804251 = product of:
0.047608502 = sum of:
0.047608502 = product of:
0.07141275 = sum of:
0.0050849267 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050849267 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.066327825 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066327825 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Type
- a
-
Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992)
0.02
0.02330686 = product of:
0.04661372 = sum of:
0.04661372 = product of:
0.06992058 = sum of:
0.061784692 = weight(_text_:j in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061784692 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
0.008135883 = weight(_text_:a in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008135883 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.02
0.02086777 = product of:
0.04173554 = sum of:
0.04173554 = product of:
0.06260331 = sum of:
0.053507112 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053507112 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.009096195 = weight(_text_:a in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009096195 = score(doc=3765,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017328596 = product of:
0.03465719 = sum of:
0.03465719 = product of:
0.051985785 = sum of:
0.0050849267 = weight(_text_:a in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050849267 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.046900857 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046900857 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
- Type
- a
-
Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999)
0.01
0.014566787 = product of:
0.029133573 = sum of:
0.029133573 = product of:
0.04370036 = sum of:
0.03861543 = weight(_text_:j in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03861543 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.0050849267 = weight(_text_:a in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050849267 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
- Type
- a
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.014424542 = product of:
0.028849084 = sum of:
0.028849084 = product of:
0.043273624 = sum of:
0.0057529383 = weight(_text_:a in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057529383 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.037520684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037520684 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
- Type
- a
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.0142825525 = product of:
0.028565105 = sum of:
0.028565105 = product of:
0.042847656 = sum of:
0.0030509564 = weight(_text_:a in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030509564 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.0397967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0397967 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.014082673 = product of:
0.028165346 = sum of:
0.028165346 = product of:
0.042248018 = sum of:
0.009417417 = weight(_text_:a in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009417417 = score(doc=6920,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.0328306 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0328306 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Type
- a
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.014082673 = product of:
0.028165346 = sum of:
0.028165346 = product of:
0.042248018 = sum of:
0.009417417 = weight(_text_:a in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009417417 = score(doc=40,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.0328306 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0328306 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
- Type
- a
-
Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002)
0.01
0.013689779 = product of:
0.027379557 = sum of:
0.027379557 = product of:
0.041069336 = sum of:
0.033441946 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033441946 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
0.007627391 = weight(_text_:a in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007627391 = score(doc=5220,freq=18.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
- Type
- a
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.01359659 = product of:
0.02719318 = sum of:
0.02719318 = product of:
0.040789768 = sum of:
0.00795917 = weight(_text_:a in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00795917 = score(doc=5269,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.0328306 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0328306 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This comparative case study of the diffusion and nondiffusion over time of eight theories in the social sciences uses citation analysis, citation context analysis, content analysis, surveys of editorial review boards, and personal interviews with theorists to develop a model of the theory functions that facilitate theory diffusion throughout specific intellectual communities. Unlike previous work on the diffusion of theories as innovations, this theory functions model differs in several important respects from the findings of previous studies that employed Everett Rogers's classic typology of innovation characteristics that promote diffusion. The model is also presented as a contribution to a more integrated theory of citation.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
- Type
- a
-
Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991)
0.01
0.012646077 = product of:
0.025292154 = sum of:
0.025292154 = product of:
0.03793823 = sum of:
0.030892346 = weight(_text_:j in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030892346 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.0070458823 = weight(_text_:a in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070458823 = score(doc=3675,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Predicting relevance of documents from citations is a common problem for information users. The study addresses the relevance prediction process and most specifically, what is viewed by the subject while using the citations. 2 kinds of protocols were collected while 11 subjects viewed 7 citations each. Eye fixations and eye movements between parts of citations were examined. Verbal reports from subjects during this process were used to explore the process of assessment
- Source
- ASIS '91: systems understanding people. proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
- Type
- a
-
Huang, S.; Qian, J.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Bu, Y.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Q.: Disclosing the relationship between citation structure and future impact of a publication (2022)
0.01
0.011343986 = product of:
0.022687972 = sum of:
0.022687972 = product of:
0.034031957 = sum of:
0.027305232 = weight(_text_:j in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027305232 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.0067267264 = weight(_text_:a in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067267264 = score(doc=621,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Each section header of an article has its distinct communicative function. Citations from distinct sections may be different regarding citing motivation. In this paper, we grouped section headers with similar functions as a structural function and defined the distribution of citations from structural functions for a paper as its citation structure. We aim to explore the relationship between citation structure and the future impact of a publication and disclose the relative importance among citations from different structural functions. Specifically, we proposed two citation counting methods and a citation life cycle identification method, by which the regression data were built. Subsequently, we employed a ridge regression model to predict the future impact of the paper and analyzed the relative weights of regressors. Based on documents collected from the Association for Computational Linguistics Anthology website, our empirical experiments disclosed that functional structure features improve the prediction accuracy of citation count prediction and that there exist differences among citations from different structural functions. Specifically, at the early stage of citation lifetime, citations from Introduction and Method are particularly important for perceiving future impact of papers, and citations from Result and Conclusion are also vital. However, early accumulation of citations from the Background seems less important.
- Type
- a
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.011141642 = product of:
0.022283284 = sum of:
0.022283284 = product of:
0.033424925 = sum of:
0.0052844114 = weight(_text_:a in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052844114 = score(doc=4215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.028140513 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028140513 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Type
- a
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.011141642 = product of:
0.022283284 = sum of:
0.022283284 = product of:
0.033424925 = sum of:
0.0052844114 = weight(_text_:a in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052844114 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.028140513 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028140513 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Type
- a
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.011141642 = product of:
0.022283284 = sum of:
0.022283284 = product of:
0.033424925 = sum of:
0.0052844114 = weight(_text_:a in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052844114 = score(doc=201,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.028140513 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028140513 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034616705 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Type
- a
