Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Stöber, T.; Teichert, A.: Webbasierte Literaturverwaltung : neue Kooperationsformen und Anwendungsszenarien (2008) 0.02
    0.019599257 = product of:
      0.029398885 = sum of:
        0.01533842 = product of:
          0.03067684 = sum of:
            0.03067684 = weight(_text_:t in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03067684 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.17409891 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014060466 = product of:
          0.028120931 = sum of:
            0.028120931 = weight(_text_:i in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028120931 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Bereich der Literaturverwaltung ist in den letzten Jahren stark in Bewegung geraten. Wurde der Markt über lange Jahre durch Anwendungen wie Endnote und Reference Manager dominiert, sind nun in kurzer Zeit neben diese etablierten Produkte zahlreiche neue Softwares und Tools getreten. So gibt es seit 2002 mit RefWorks ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm, das vollkommen webbasiert arbeitet; im Bereich der Social Software sind Anwendungen wie BibSonomy, CiteULike und Connotea entstanden; und das vielbeachtete Tool Zotero4 beschreitet gänzlich neue Wege, indem es sich als Add-On direkt in den Browser integriert. Ein umfangreicher Vergleich wichtiger aktueller Literaturverwaltungsprogramme bzw. -dienste, der im Rahmen eines DFG-Projekts an der UB Augsburg entstanden ist, hat dabei gezeigt, dass die verglichenen kommerziellen Programme (Citavi, Endnote mit Endnote Web, RefWorks) mittlerweile kaum mehr Unterschiede beim Leistungsumfang aufweisen. Der zentrale Unterschied liegt vielmehr in der zugrundeliegenden Arbeitsphilosophie: während Anwendungen wie Citavi und Endnote als Einzelplatzlösungen konzipiert sind und eher auf einen individuellen Datenpool abzielen, arbeiten Endnote Web und RefWorks webbasiert und können dadurch auch eine Reihe zusätzlicher Kooperationsfunktionalitäten bereitstellen. Ebenfalls webbasiert arbeiten Dienste wie BibSonomy und Connotea, die in den letzten Jahren neben diese kommerziellen Produkte getreten sind und das Prinzip der Social Software auf den Bereich der Literaturverwaltung übertragen. Auf diese Entwicklung haben bereits erste Bibliotheken reagiert und diese Dienste in ihre Angebote eingebunden. So kann beispielsweise im Kölner Universitäts-Gesamtkatalog aus der Trefferanzeige heraus über einen entsprechenden Button ein Treffer direkt an BibSonomy gesendet werden; die Metadaten der im Dokumentenserver der LMU München gespeicherten Dokumente werden automatisch in Connotea eingespeist. Diese Beispiele machen deutlich, dass wir es derzeit mit einer sehr dynamischen Entwicklung zu tun haben, die zugleich offenbar zu einem qualitativen Sprung im Bereich der Literaturverwaltungsprogramme bzw. -dienste geführt hat. Um diesen qualitativen Sprung etwas genauer zu beschreiben, möchten wir im Folgenden eine Typologie vorstellen mit dem Ziel, die einzelnen Entwicklungstendenzen besser sichtbar zu machen. Im Anschluss möchten wir auf die Frage eingehen, welche konkreten neuen Anwendungsszenarien des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens sich aus diesen Entwicklungen ableiten lassen. Wir unterscheiden in diesem Sinne drei Arten von Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen: 1. die "traditionelle" Literaturverwaltung, die wesentlich auf einen einzelnen Nutzer und seine Daten bezogen ist ("geschlossenes System") 2. die webbasierte Literaturverwaltung I, die Online-Accounts bereitstellt mit der Möglichkeit von begrenzten Freigaben für andere Nutzer ("halboffenes System") 3. die webbasierte Literaturverwaltung II, die - ganz im Sinne der Social Software - auf einen gemeinsamen Datenpool abzielt ("offenes System").
  2. European directory of text retrieval software (1993) 0.02
    0.018747289 = product of:
      0.056241862 = sum of:
        0.056241862 = product of:
          0.112483725 = sum of:
            0.112483725 = weight(_text_:i in 6219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112483725 = score(doc=6219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 6219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    i
  3. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.02
    0.016160224 = product of:
      0.048480667 = sum of:
        0.048480667 = product of:
          0.096961334 = sum of:
            0.096961334 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096961334 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  4. Bibliographic software and the electronic library (1995) 0.02
    0.01533842 = product of:
      0.04601526 = sum of:
        0.04601526 = product of:
          0.09203052 = sum of:
            0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09203052 = score(doc=4634,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    HANSON, T.: What is bibliographic software; HANSON, T.: Importing downloaded records into bibliographic software; HANSON, T.: Standardising on Pro-Cite at the University of Portsmouth; COX, J.: Library support for Reference Manager at a School of Medicine; MILLIGAN, J.: EndNote on the Apple at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund; DAVNALL, S.: Papyrus at the University of Manchester and the CHEST licence; CARTER, E.R.: A trial of PC bibliographic database and formatting packages; SLEE, D.: Electrocopying from databases; OPPENHEIM, C.: Staying within the law
    Editor
    Hanson, T.
  5. Hanson, T.: Pro-Cite version 2 : a review (1993) 0.01
    0.012782018 = product of:
      0.038346052 = sum of:
        0.038346052 = product of:
          0.076692104 = sum of:
            0.076692104 = weight(_text_:t in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076692104 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Stephan, A.: Datenbanksysteme zur Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten : Anforderung und Wertung (1994) 0.01
    0.012782018 = product of:
      0.038346052 = sum of:
        0.038346052 = product of:
          0.076692104 = sum of:
            0.076692104 = weight(_text_:t in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076692104 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Personalcomputer. T.2: Anwendung von PCs in Bibliotheken. Vollständige Neufassung
  7. EndNote Plus 2.3 : Enhanced reference database and bibliography maker. With EndLink 2.1, link to on-line and CD-ROM databases (1997) 0.01
    0.012782018 = product of:
      0.038346052 = sum of:
        0.038346052 = product of:
          0.076692104 = sum of:
            0.076692104 = weight(_text_:t in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076692104 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International journal of information management. 17(1997) no.6, S.470-472 (T. Wilson)
  8. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.01
    0.012120167 = product of:
      0.0363605 = sum of:
        0.0363605 = product of:
          0.072721 = sum of:
            0.072721 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072721 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
  9. Dell'Orso, F.: Rassegna di manuali publicati all'estero su micro CDS/ISIS (1995) 0.01
    0.011717054 = product of:
      0.03515116 = sum of:
        0.03515116 = product of:
          0.07030232 = sum of:
            0.07030232 = weight(_text_:i in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07030232 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    i
  10. Trigari, M.: Tutti i colori dell'Iride (1995) 0.01
    0.011599293 = product of:
      0.034797877 = sum of:
        0.034797877 = product of:
          0.069595754 = sum of:
            0.069595754 = weight(_text_:i in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069595754 = score(doc=4890,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    i
  11. Stöber, T.: Serviceangebote der wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken im Bereich Literaturverwaltung : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage (2010) 0.01
    0.010225614 = product of:
      0.03067684 = sum of:
        0.03067684 = product of:
          0.06135368 = sum of:
            0.06135368 = weight(_text_:t in 3722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06135368 = score(doc=3722,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 3722, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3722)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Böhner, D.; Stöber, T.; Teichert, A.; Lemke, D.; Tietze, K.; Helfer, M.; Frauenrath, P.; Podschull, S.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme im Vergleich (2016) 0.01
    0.010225614 = product of:
      0.03067684 = sum of:
        0.03067684 = product of:
          0.06135368 = sum of:
            0.06135368 = weight(_text_:t in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06135368 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.010100139 = product of:
      0.030300418 = sum of:
        0.030300418 = product of:
          0.060600836 = sum of:
            0.060600836 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060600836 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  14. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.010100139 = product of:
      0.030300418 = sum of:
        0.030300418 = product of:
          0.060600836 = sum of:
            0.060600836 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060600836 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  15. Freese, E.; Göbel, E.: Literaturdokumentation mit LIDOS und Archivierung am Beispiel des Spezialarchives Arbeit und Gesundheit : Handlungsanleitung (1998) 0.01
    0.010100139 = product of:
      0.030300418 = sum of:
        0.030300418 = product of:
          0.060600836 = sum of:
            0.060600836 = weight(_text_:22 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060600836 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 15:38:22
  16. Siegling, I.: Dateien auf dem Index : Dokumentenmanagement zu Hause (2000) 0.01
    0.009373644 = product of:
      0.028120931 = sum of:
        0.028120931 = product of:
          0.056241862 = sum of:
            0.056241862 = weight(_text_:i in 5320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056241862 = score(doc=5320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 5320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Dell'Orso, F.: Micro CDS/ISIS : analisi di un information retrieval system per personal computer (1995) 0.01
    0.009373644 = product of:
      0.028120931 = sum of:
        0.028120931 = product of:
          0.056241862 = sum of:
            0.056241862 = weight(_text_:i in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056241862 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    i
  18. Kulkarni, M.; Gupta, V.K.; Viswanathan, T.: ¬An automatic index generation and information retrieval system for bibliographic database developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (1996) 0.01
    0.008947412 = product of:
      0.026842235 = sum of:
        0.026842235 = product of:
          0.05368447 = sum of:
            0.05368447 = weight(_text_:t in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05368447 = score(doc=4525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Jucquois-Delpierre, M.: Is information retrieval with microcomputers mini-information-retrieval? (1992) 0.01
    0.008201938 = product of:
      0.024605814 = sum of:
        0.024605814 = product of:
          0.04921163 = sum of:
            0.04921163 = weight(_text_:i in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04921163 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Are microcomputers able to support good IRSs? How do they cope with them? What types of IRS are currently available? After explaining the differences between IRSs using micros and IRSs using mainframes, this paper will describe various functions of 'microretrieval' (by which I mean IR on microcomputers) functions, possible criteria for selection, and essential differences between database systems. It will give a short market overview and compare some IRSs currently available (such as LARS, BRS, LIDOS, HYPERCARD, HEUREKA, CICADE, ALLEGRO, etc.) It will also explain how microretrieval could be the kernel of economic, scientific or technical integration and assist in the cooperation between countries with different levels of development
  20. Dell'Orso, F.: Pro-Cite, per dare forma ai record bibliografici (1994) 0.01
    0.008201938 = product of:
      0.024605814 = sum of:
        0.024605814 = product of:
          0.04921163 = sum of:
            0.04921163 = weight(_text_:i in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04921163 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    i