Search (69 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.03
    0.03464692 = product of:
      0.051970378 = sum of:
        0.02711475 = product of:
          0.0542295 = sum of:
            0.0542295 = weight(_text_:t in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0542295 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024855627 = product of:
          0.049711253 = sum of:
            0.049711253 = weight(_text_:i in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049711253 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
    Series
    Propozycje i Materialy; 6
  2. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.03
    0.030544072 = product of:
      0.09163222 = sum of:
        0.09163222 = sum of:
          0.04921163 = weight(_text_:i in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04921163 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04472842 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.042420585 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042420585 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04472842 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
  3. Wolters, C.: GOS Thesaurus-Handbuch : zum Projekt: Sammlungsmanagement für kulturgeschichtliche Museen in den neuen Bundesländern (1997) 0.03
    0.029793557 = product of:
      0.044690333 = sum of:
        0.02711475 = product of:
          0.0542295 = sum of:
            0.0542295 = weight(_text_:t in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0542295 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01757558 = product of:
          0.03515116 = sum of:
            0.03515116 = weight(_text_:i in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515116 = score(doc=4009,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Das GOS Thesaurus-Handbuch wurde für die Teilnehmer an dem von der ROBERTBOSCH-STIFTUNG geförderten Projekt "Sammlungsmanagement für kulturgeschichtliche Museen in den neuen Bundesländern" (Spitzname: "Knorr-Projekt") geschrieben. Es basiert auf den bereits Mitte der 80er Jahre vom Institut für Museumskunde in Zusammenarbeit mit dem heutigen Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB) durchgeführten und 1988 publizierten Arbeiten im Projekt "Kleine Museen".' Schon damals war zu erkennen, daß die international gültige Thesaurusnorm auch in den Museen auf dem Siegeszug war. Heute ist sie die Grundlage aller wichtigen Projekte zur internationalen Zusammenarbeit bei der Museumsdokumentation. GOS-Benutzer, die sich noch nie mit solchen Dingen befaßt haben, können dieses Handbuch als eine allgemeine Einführung in die Thesaurusarbeit benutzen, denn es behandelt alle Grundfunktionen eines Thesaurus nach DIN 1463. Es besteht aus einem "Lesebuch", in dem es mehr um die Zusammenhänge und etwas Hintergrundwissen geht sowie einem "Datenkatalog" mit der Beschreibung der Datenfelder des Thesaurus, gedruckt aus einer kleinen GOS-Datenbank, aus der auch die "H i l f e t e x t e " im GOS-Menü geholt werden. Wir haben uns - mit einiger Mühe allerdings - jeden Hinweis auf "gerade in Entwicklung befindliche" und "in wenigen Monaten freizugebende" Leistungen von GOS verkniffen und uns auschließlich auf Dinge beschränkt, die in den am Projekt direkt beteiligten Museen vor März 1997 routinemäßig angewendet wurden.
  4. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.02
    0.022882156 = product of:
      0.034323234 = sum of:
        0.019173026 = product of:
          0.038346052 = sum of:
            0.038346052 = weight(_text_:t in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038346052 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015150209 = product of:
          0.030300418 = sum of:
            0.030300418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030300418 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
  5. Pimenov, E.N.: Normativnost' i nekotorye problem razrabotki tezauruzov i drugikh lingvistiicheskikh sredstv IPS (2000) 0.02
    0.01657042 = product of:
      0.049711253 = sum of:
        0.049711253 = product of:
          0.09942251 = sum of:
            0.09942251 = weight(_text_:i in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09942251 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.02
    0.015497372 = product of:
      0.046492115 = sum of:
        0.046492115 = product of:
          0.09298423 = sum of:
            0.09298423 = weight(_text_:t in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09298423 = score(doc=604,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.52770925 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Joyce, T.; Needham, R.M.: ¬The thesaurus approach to information retrieval (1958) 0.02
    0.01533842 = product of:
      0.04601526 = sum of:
        0.04601526 = product of:
          0.09203052 = sum of:
            0.09203052 = weight(_text_:t in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09203052 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01
    0.014140195 = product of:
      0.042420585 = sum of:
        0.042420585 = product of:
          0.08484117 = sum of:
            0.08484117 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08484117 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  9. Rothkirch und Trach, K.C. Graf von: Prinzipen der Thesauruserstellung : dargestellt am Beispiel (I) des Aufbaues eiens internen Informationssystems für die Studiengruppe für Systemforschung, (II) der Erstellung von Fachthesauri für das Projekt Bundestagsverwaltung der Studiengruppe für Systemforschung (1970) 0.01
    0.014060467 = product of:
      0.0421814 = sum of:
        0.0421814 = product of:
          0.0843628 = sum of:
            0.0843628 = weight(_text_:i in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0843628 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Rahmstorf, G.: Bedeutungsdefinition und Wortumfeld (1993) 0.01
    0.014060467 = product of:
      0.0421814 = sum of:
        0.0421814 = product of:
          0.0843628 = sum of:
            0.0843628 = weight(_text_:i in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0843628 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wortschatz, Satz, Text. Beiträge der Konferenzen in Greifswald und Neubrandenburg 1992. Hrsg.: G. Bartels u. I. Pohl
  11. Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996) 0.01
    0.014060467 = product of:
      0.0421814 = sum of:
        0.0421814 = product of:
          0.0843628 = sum of:
            0.0843628 = weight(_text_:i in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0843628 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Propozycje i Materialy; 6
  12. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.012120167 = product of:
      0.0363605 = sum of:
        0.0363605 = product of:
          0.072721 = sum of:
            0.072721 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072721 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  13. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.012120167 = product of:
      0.0363605 = sum of:
        0.0363605 = product of:
          0.072721 = sum of:
            0.072721 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072721 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  14. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.012120167 = product of:
      0.0363605 = sum of:
        0.0363605 = product of:
          0.072721 = sum of:
            0.072721 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072721 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  15. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01
    0.012120167 = product of:
      0.0363605 = sum of:
        0.0363605 = product of:
          0.072721 = sum of:
            0.072721 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072721 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1566313 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  16. Lerch, I.: ¬Das Dokumentationshilfsmittel Thesaurus (1982) 0.01
    0.011717054 = product of:
      0.03515116 = sum of:
        0.03515116 = product of:
          0.07030232 = sum of:
            0.07030232 = weight(_text_:i in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07030232 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Muraszkiewicz, M.; Rybinski, H.; Struk, W.: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri (1996) 0.01
    0.011717054 = product of:
      0.03515116 = sum of:
        0.03515116 = product of:
          0.07030232 = sum of:
            0.07030232 = weight(_text_:i in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07030232 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Propozycje i Materialy; 6
  18. Graumann, S.: Aufbau, Struktur und Probleme bei der Erstellung eines EDV-gestützten Thesaurus (1985) 0.01
    0.011717054 = product of:
      0.03515116 = sum of:
        0.03515116 = product of:
          0.07030232 = sum of:
            0.07030232 = weight(_text_:i in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07030232 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Anwendungen in der Klassifikation. I. Proc. 8. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 10.-13.4.1984. Hrsg.: R.G. Henzler
  19. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.01
    0.0108501455 = product of:
      0.032550436 = sum of:
        0.032550436 = product of:
          0.06510087 = sum of:
            0.06510087 = weight(_text_:i in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06510087 = score(doc=2362,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.16870351 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.38588926 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
    According to my findings several relations available in the thesaurus query interface as "roles", are not used, i.e. there are not yet any assertions with them. And those which are used do not contribute to complete concept definitions of concepts which represent thesaurus main entries. In other words: The authors claim to already have a "description logic based nomenclature", where there is not yet one which deserves that title by being much more than a thesaurus with strict subsumption and additional inheritable semantic links. In the last section of the paper the authors say: "The most time consuming process in this conversion was making a careful analysis of the Thesaurus to understand the best way to translate it into OWL." "For other conversions, these same types of distinctions and decisions must be made. The expressive power of a proprietary encoding can vary widely from that in OWL or RDF. Understanding the original semantics and engineering a solution that most closely duplicates it is critical for creating a useful and accu-rate ontology." My question is: What decisions were made and are they exemplary, can they be rec-ommended as "the best way"? I raise strong doubts with respect to that, and I miss more profound discussions of the issues at stake. The following notes are dedicated to a critical description and assessment of the results of that conversion activity. They are written in a tutorial style more or less addressing students, but myself being a learner especially in the field of medical knowledge representation I do not speak "ex cathedra".
  20. Shiri, A.; Chambers, T.: Information retrieval from digital libraries : assessing the potential utility of thesauri in supporting users' search behaviour in an interdisciplinary domain (2008) 0.01
    0.010845901 = product of:
      0.032537702 = sum of:
        0.032537702 = product of:
          0.065075405 = sum of:
            0.065075405 = weight(_text_:t in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065075405 = score(doc=2263,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17620352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04472842 = queryNorm
                0.36931956 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 19
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 49
  • el 6
  • m 6
  • s 4
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • n 2
  • More… Less…