Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.00
    0.0019700683 = product of:
      0.0039401366 = sum of:
        0.0039401366 = product of:
          0.007880273 = sum of:
            0.007880273 = weight(_text_:s in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007880273 = score(doc=3606,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die deutsche Übersetzung in: ZfBB (1994) H.3, S.294-297
    Pages
    S.231-255
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  2. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00
    0.0016519525 = product of:
      0.003303905 = sum of:
        0.003303905 = product of:
          0.00660781 = sum of:
            0.00660781 = weight(_text_:s in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00660781 = score(doc=1643,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
  3. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988) 0.00
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
      0.0019700683 = sum of:
        0.0019700683 = product of:
          0.0039401366 = sum of:
            0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039401366 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
  4. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    7.387756E-4 = product of:
      0.0014775512 = sum of:
        0.0014775512 = product of:
          0.0029551024 = sum of:
            0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029551024 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-15
  5. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    7.387756E-4 = product of:
      0.0014775512 = sum of:
        0.0014775512 = product of:
          0.0029551024 = sum of:
            0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029551024 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.17-30