Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.6, S.466-468
  2. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.01
    0.008708754 = product of:
      0.017417507 = sum of:
        0.017417507 = sum of:
          0.002089573 = weight(_text_:s in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002089573 = score(doc=1786,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.050964262 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.015327934 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015327934 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19
    Footnote
    Rez. in Mitt. VÖB 56(2003) H.3/4, S. 81-82 (I. Müller): "Ein Blick in die Vergangenheit kann hilfreich für das Verständnis der Gegenwart und die Einschätzung der Zukunft sein (Berhard Fabian) - Nach diesem Motto betrachtet B. Lorenz die bibliothekarische Sacherschließung im gesamten und stellt sie aus der Sicht der historischen Entwicklung und Bedeutung dar. Es geht ihm darum, historische Kenntnisse zu nutzen, um Erfahrungen nachzuvollziehen und Fehler weitgehend zu vermeiden bzw. zu minimieren. So bildet die Einordnung in das größere Umfeld der Bibliotheksgeschichte und der Wissenschaftsgeschichte einen wesentlichen Faktor. Dies erfolgt in Verbindung mit wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen, da der Autor darauf aufbaut, dass die Wissenschaftsgeschichte eine wesentliche Grundlage einer reflektierenden Inhaltserschließungsdiskussion darstellt. Das Werk liefert daher historische Beispiele für die Bedeutung und Definition bibliothekarischer Aufstellungsklassifikationen ebenso wie Grundüberlegungen zur Systematischen Aufstellung einschließlich besonderer Anforderungen und Berücksichtigung von Problemen anhand von Beispielen aus Theorie und Praxis. Das Kapitel über die Geschichte der Systematischen Freihandaufstellung liefert daher Beispiele aus Klosterbibliotheken des Mittelalters bis hin zum Bereich der Privatbibliotheken von Ärzten späterer Zeit. Wichtige internationale Klassifikationen sowie Neuentwicklungen an neueren deutschen Universitätsbibliotheken versieht der Autor allerdings mit kritischen Anmerkungen betreffend die Unterschiede innerhalb von Systematiken. Dem folgt eine Gegenüberstellung von Aufstellungssystematiken bzw. Beispielen für den Vergleich von Aufstellungsklassifikationen. B. Lorenz beweist in seinen "Notizen" als "Wechselspiel" deutlich, wie untrennbar die Geschichte der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung von der Geschichte der Wissenschaften ist. Letztendlich kommt der Autor übereinstimmend mit Klara Erdei zu dem Schluß, "dass der Online-Katalog nicht den Untergang sondern eher eine Renaissance der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation mit sich bringen kann: eine noch benutzerfreundlichere, vielseitigere Realisierung der systematischen Erschließung und Suche". Das vorliegende Werk ist keine technische Auflistung von formalen, pragmatischen oder strukturellen Fragen und es ist auch keine weitere Darstellung des Wesens der Systematik. Vielmehr ist es dem Autor erfolgreich gelungen, den Fragen der hierarchisch höchst- bzw. hochstehenden Gliederungen und des Inhalts ausgewählter Klassifikationssysteme in historischer Betrachtung nachzugehen."
    Pages
    VII, 365 S
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Major developments in classification (1977) 0.00
    0.0019700683 = product of:
      0.0039401366 = sum of:
        0.0039401366 = product of:
          0.007880273 = sum of:
            0.007880273 = weight(_text_:s in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007880273 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 7(1977), S.41-103
  4. Friis-Hansen, J.B.: What Dewey knew (1976) 0.00
    0.0019700683 = product of:
      0.0039401366 = sum of:
        0.0039401366 = product of:
          0.007880273 = sum of:
            0.007880273 = weight(_text_:s in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007880273 = score(doc=708,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Libri. 26(1976) no.3, S.216-230
  5. Wimmer, F.: ¬Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation : Betrachtungen zu ihrer Entstehungsgeschichte und Aktualität (1985) 0.00
    0.0017238096 = product of:
      0.0034476193 = sum of:
        0.0034476193 = product of:
          0.0068952385 = sum of:
            0.0068952385 = weight(_text_:s in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0068952385 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 29(1985) Nr.5, S.15-18
  6. Salah, A.A.; Gao, C.; Suchecki, K.; Scharnhorst, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The evolution of classification systems : ontogeny of the UDC (2012) 0.00
    8.619048E-4 = product of:
      0.0017238096 = sum of:
        0.0017238096 = product of:
          0.0034476193 = sum of:
            0.0034476193 = weight(_text_:s in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034476193 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.51-57
  7. Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985) 0.00
    6.9652434E-4 = product of:
      0.0013930487 = sum of:
        0.0013930487 = product of:
          0.0027860973 = sum of:
            0.0027860973 = weight(_text_:s in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027860973 = score(doc=3623,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Library journal 36(1911) S.410,414-415.
    Pages
    S.71-74
  8. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.00
    6.9652434E-4 = product of:
      0.0013930487 = sum of:
        0.0013930487 = product of:
          0.0027860973 = sum of:
            0.0027860973 = weight(_text_:s in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027860973 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
    Pages
    S.21-34
  9. Hopwood, H.V.: Dewey expanded (1985) 0.00
    6.9652434E-4 = product of:
      0.0013930487 = sum of:
        0.0013930487 = product of:
          0.0027860973 = sum of:
            0.0027860973 = weight(_text_:s in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027860973 = score(doc=3629,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Library Association Record 9(1907) S.307-322.
    Pages
    S.35-47
  10. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997) 0.00
    6.156463E-4 = product of:
      0.0012312926 = sum of:
        0.0012312926 = product of:
          0.0024625852 = sum of:
            0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024625852 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.331-339
  11. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.00
    6.156463E-4 = product of:
      0.0012312926 = sum of:
        0.0012312926 = product of:
          0.0024625852 = sum of:
            0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024625852 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.23-28