Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Petras, V.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Evaluation im Information Retrieval (2023) 0.00
    0.0010447865 = product of:
      0.002089573 = sum of:
        0.002089573 = product of:
          0.004179146 = sum of:
            0.004179146 = weight(_text_:s in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004179146 = score(doc=808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das Ziel einer Evaluation ist die Überprüfung, ob bzw. in welchem Ausmaß ein Informationssystem die an das System gestellten Anforderungen erfüllt. Informationssysteme können aus verschiedenen Perspektiven evaluiert werden. Für eine ganzheitliche Evaluation (als Synonym wird auch Evaluierung benutzt), die unterschiedliche Qualitätsaspekte betrachtet (z. B. wie gut ein System relevante Dokumente rankt, wie schnell ein System die Suche durchführt, wie die Ergebnispräsentation gestaltet ist oder wie Suchende durch das System geführt werden) und die Erfüllung mehrerer Anforderungen überprüft, empfiehlt es sich, sowohl eine perspektivische als auch methodische Triangulation (d. h. der Einsatz von mehreren Ansätzen zur Qualitätsüberprüfung) vorzunehmen. Im Information Retrieval (IR) konzentriert sich die Evaluation auf die Qualitätseinschätzung der Suchfunktion eines Information-Retrieval-Systems (IRS), wobei oft zwischen systemzentrierter und nutzerzentrierter Evaluation unterschieden wird. Dieses Kapitel setzt den Fokus auf die systemzentrierte Evaluation, während andere Kapitel dieses Handbuchs andere Evaluationsansätze diskutieren (s. Kapitel C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval, C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval und D 1 Information Behavior).
    Pages
    S.443-453
  2. Meyer, O.C.: Retrievalexperimente mit bibliothekarischen Daten : Historischer Überblick und aktueller Forschungsstand (2022) 0.00
    7.387756E-4 = product of:
      0.0014775512 = sum of:
        0.0014775512 = product of:
          0.0029551024 = sum of:
            0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029551024 = score(doc=655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    III, 66 S
  3. Parapar, J.; Losada, D.E.; Presedo-Quindimil, M.A.; Barreiro, A.: Using score distributions to compare statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation (2020) 0.00
    6.156463E-4 = product of:
      0.0012312926 = sum of:
        0.0012312926 = product of:
          0.0024625852 = sum of:
            0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024625852 = score(doc=5506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.98-113
  4. Vegt, A. van der; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.: Do better search engines really equate to better clinical decisions? : If not, why not? (2021) 0.00
    6.156463E-4 = product of:
      0.0012312926 = sum of:
        0.0012312926 = product of:
          0.0024625852 = sum of:
            0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024625852 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.2, S.141-155
  5. Wartena, C.; Golub, K.: Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals (2021) 0.00
    6.156463E-4 = product of:
      0.0012312926 = sum of:
        0.0012312926 = product of:
          0.0024625852 = sum of:
            0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024625852 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.325-348
  6. Gao, R.; Ge, Y.; Sha, C.: FAIR: Fairness-aware information retrieval evaluation (2022) 0.00
    6.156463E-4 = product of:
      0.0012312926 = sum of:
        0.0012312926 = product of:
          0.0024625852 = sum of:
            0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0024625852 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.10, S.1461-1473