Search (487 results, page 2 of 25)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.80-89
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
    Pages
    S.203-214
  3. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  4. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
    Pages
    XIV, 294 S
  5. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  6. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.235-243
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  7. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  8. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.02
    0.015436349 = product of:
      0.030872699 = sum of:
        0.030872699 = sum of:
          0.0019700683 = weight(_text_:s in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0019700683 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.028902631 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028902631 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Pages
    S.200-201
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  9. Das, S.; Roy, S.: Faceted ontological model for brain tumour study (2016) 0.01
    0.014905941 = product of:
      0.029811881 = sum of:
        0.029811881 = sum of:
          0.0042653233 = weight(_text_:s in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0042653233 = score(doc=2831,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2016 13:21:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.1, S.3-12
  10. Mahesh, K.: Highly expressive tagging for knowledge organization in the 21st century (2014) 0.01
    0.01451459 = product of:
      0.02902918 = sum of:
        0.02902918 = sum of:
          0.0034826214 = weight(_text_:s in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0034826214 = score(doc=1434,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization of large-scale content on the Web requires substantial amounts of semantic metadata that is expensive to generate manually. Recent developments in Web technologies have enabled any user to tag documents and other forms of content thereby generating metadata that could help organize knowledge. However, merely adding one or more tags to a document is highly inadequate to capture the aboutness of the document and thereby to support powerful semantic functions such as automatic classification, question answering or true semantic search and retrieval. This is true even when the tags used are labels from a well-designed classification system such as a thesaurus or taxonomy. There is a strong need to develop a semantic tagging mechanism with sufficient expressive power to capture the aboutness of each part of a document or dataset or multimedia content in order to enable applications that can benefit from knowledge organization on the Web. This article proposes a highly expressive mechanism of using ontology snippets as semantic tags that map portions of a document or a part of a dataset or a segment of a multimedia content to concepts and relations in an ontology of the domain(s) of interest.
    Pages
    S.274-280
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Bringsjord, S.; Clark, M.; Taylor, J.: Sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning requires philosophy (2014) 0.01
    0.01451459 = product of:
      0.02902918 = sum of:
        0.02902918 = sum of:
          0.0034826214 = weight(_text_:s in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0034826214 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:14
    Pages
    S.99-119
  12. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
    Pages
    73 S. + CD
  13. Cui, H.: Competency evaluation of plant character ontologies against domain literature (2010) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=3466,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=3466,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 9:55:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1144-1165
  14. Kless, D.: Erstellung eines allgemeinen Standards zur Wissensorganisation : Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege (2010) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 4422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=4422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4422)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 4422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=4422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.147-153
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  15. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.192-205
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
  16. Baião Salgado Silva, G.; Lima, G.Â. Borém de Oliveira: Using topic maps in establishing compatibility of semantically structured hypertext contents (2012) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:39:23
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.6, S.432-445
  17. Almeida Campos, M.L. de; Machado Campos, M.L.; Dávila, A.M.R.; Espanha Gomes, H.; Campos, L.M.; Lira e Oliveira, L. de: Information sciences methodological aspects applied to ontology reuse tools : a study based on genomic annotations in the domain of trypanosomatides (2013) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:03:53
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.50-61
  18. Kiren, T.; Shoaib, M.: ¬A novel ontology matching approach using key concepts (2016) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.1, S.99-111
  19. Conde, A.; Larrañaga, M.; Arruarte, A.; Elorriaga, J.A.; Roth, D.: litewi: a combined term extraction and entity linking method for eliciting educational ontologies from textbooks (2016) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:38:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.380-399
  20. Marcondes, C.H.; Costa, L.C da.: ¬A model to represent and process scientific knowledge in biomedical articles with semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2016 13:17:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.2, S.73-85

Years

Languages

  • e 367
  • d 108
  • pt 4
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 381
  • el 71
  • m 38
  • x 34
  • s 15
  • r 8
  • n 5
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications