Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.03 
    0.028009143 = product of:
  0.056018285 = sum of:
    0.056018285 = sum of:
      0.0049251704 = weight(_text_:s in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0049251704 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.051093116 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051093116 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  2. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.02 
    0.022407314 = product of:
  0.044814628 = sum of:
    0.044814628 = sum of:
      0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0039401366 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
      0.040874492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040874492 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
    Source
    AI communications. 10(1997) nos.3/4, S.167-176
  3. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02 
    0.019606398 = product of:
  0.039212797 = sum of:
    0.039212797 = sum of:
      0.0034476193 = weight(_text_:s in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0034476193 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.03576518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03576518 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  4. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.02 
    0.016805485 = product of:
  0.03361097 = sum of:
    0.03361097 = sum of:
      0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0029551024 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030655868 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.235-243
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  5. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02 
    0.016805485 = product of:
  0.03361097 = sum of:
    0.03361097 = sum of:
      0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0029551024 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030655868 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03771094 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  6. Rath, H.H.: Mozart oder Kugel : Mit Topic Maps intelligente Informationsnetze aufbauen (1999) 0.00 
    0.0019700683 = product of:
  0.0039401366 = sum of:
    0.0039401366 = product of:
      0.007880273 = sum of:
        0.007880273 = weight(_text_:s in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007880273 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    iX. 1999, H.12, S.149-155
  7. Wildgen, W.: Semantischer Realismus und Antirealismus in der Sprachtheorie (1992) 0.00 
    0.0014775512 = product of:
  0.0029551024 = sum of:
    0.0029551024 = product of:
      0.0059102047 = sum of:
        0.0059102047 = weight(_text_:s in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059102047 = score(doc=2071,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.137-149
  8. Kutschera, F. von: ¬Der erkenntnistheoretische Realismus (1992) 0.00 
    0.0014775512 = product of:
  0.0029551024 = sum of:
    0.0029551024 = product of:
      0.0059102047 = sum of:
        0.0059102047 = weight(_text_:s in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059102047 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.27-40
  9. Franzen, W.: Idealismus statt Realismus? : Realismus plus Skeptizismus! (1992) 0.00 
    0.0014775512 = product of:
  0.0029551024 = sum of:
    0.0029551024 = product of:
      0.0059102047 = sum of:
        0.0059102047 = weight(_text_:s in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059102047 = score(doc=4612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.41-54
  10. Sandkühler, H.J.: Epistemologischer Realismus und die Wirklichkeit des Wissens : eine Verteidigung der Philosophie des Geistes gegen Naturalismus und Reduktionismus (1992) 0.00 
    0.0012312926 = product of:
  0.0024625852 = sum of:
    0.0024625852 = product of:
      0.0049251704 = sum of:
        0.0049251704 = weight(_text_:s in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0049251704 = score(doc=1663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.187-210
  11. Roth, G.; Schwegler, H.: Kognitive Referenz und Selbstreferentialität des Gehirns : ein Beitrag zur Klärung des Verhältnisses zwischen Erkenntnistheorie und Hirnforschung (1992) 0.00 
    0.0012312926 = product of:
  0.0024625852 = sum of:
    0.0024625852 = product of:
      0.0049251704 = sum of:
        0.0049251704 = weight(_text_:s in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0049251704 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.105-117
  12. Semantic knowledge and semantic representations (1995) 0.00 
    0.0011013018 = product of:
  0.0022026035 = sum of:
    0.0022026035 = product of:
      0.004405207 = sum of:
        0.004405207 = weight(_text_:s in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004405207 = score(doc=3568,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.1074421 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    G. Gainotti, M.C. Silveri, A. Daniele, L. Giustolisi, Neuroanatomical Correlates of Category-specific Semantic Disorders: A Critical Survey. J. S. Snowden, H. L. Griffiths, D. Neary, Autobiographical Experience and Word Meaning. L. Cipolotti, E.K. Warrington, Towards a Unitary Account of Access Dysphasia: A Single Case Study. E. Forde, G.W. Humphreys, Refractory Semantics in Global Aphasia: On Semantic Organisation and the Access-Storage Distinction in Neuropsychology. A. E. Hillis, A. Caramazza, The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations: Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming. H.E. Moss, L.K. Tyler, Investigating Semantic Memory Impairments: The Contribution of Semantic Priming. K.R. Laws, S.A. Humber, D.J.C. Ramsey, R.A. McCarthy, Probing Sensory and Associative Semantics for Animals and Objects in Normal Subjects. K.R. Laws, J.J. Evans, J. R. Hodges, R.A. McCarthy, Naming without Knowing and Appearance without Associations: Evidence for Constructive Processes in Semantic Memory? J. Powell, J. Davidoff, Selective Impairments of Object-knowledge in a Case of Acquired Cortical Blindness. J.R. Hodges, N. Graham, K. Patterson, Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. E. Funnell, Objects and Properties: A Study of the Breakdown of Semantic Memory. L.J. Tippett, S. McAuliffe, M. J. Farrar, Preservation of Categorical Knowledge in Alzheimer's Disease: A Computational Account. G. W. Humphreys, C. Lamote, T.J. Lloyd-Jones, An Interactive Activation Approach to Object Processing: Effects of Structural Similarity, Name Frequency, and Task in Normality and Pathology.
    Pages
    IV S., S. 226-596
    Type
    s
  13. Falkenberg, E.; Hesse, W.; Lindgreen, P.; Nilsson, B.E.; Oei, J.L.H.; Rolland, C.; Stamper, R.K.; Van Assche, F.J.M.; Verrijn-Stuart, A.A.; Voss, K.: FRISCO - A framework of information system concepts : the FRISCO report; final draft (1996) 0.00 
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
  0.0019700683 = sum of:
    0.0019700683 = product of:
      0.0039401366 = sum of:
        0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 3056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039401366 = score(doc=3056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    xxx S
  14. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Bessere Information durch Zusammenfassen aus dem WWW (1999) 0.00 
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
  0.0019700683 = sum of:
    0.0019700683 = product of:
      0.0039401366 = sum of:
        0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 4496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039401366 = score(doc=4496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4496)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    14 S
  15. Vickery, B.C.: Ontologies (1997) 0.00 
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
  0.0019700683 = sum of:
    0.0019700683 = product of:
      0.0039401366 = sum of:
        0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039401366 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 23(1997) no.4, S.277-286
  16. Reimer, U.: Einführung in die Wissensrepräsentation : netzartige und schema-basierte Repräsentationsformate (1991) 0.00 
    8.619048E-4 = product of:
  0.0017238096 = sum of:
    0.0017238096 = product of:
      0.0034476193 = sum of:
        0.0034476193 = weight(_text_:s in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034476193 = score(doc=1566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    X, 313 S
  17. Fischer, D.H.: From thesauri towards ontologies? (1998) 0.00 
    7.387756E-4 = product of:
  0.0014775512 = sum of:
    0.0014775512 = product of:
      0.0029551024 = sum of:
        0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029551024 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.18-30
  18. Wright, L.W.; Nardini, H.K.G.; Aronson, A.R.; Rindflesch, T.C.: Hierarchical concept indexing of full-text documents in the Unified Medical Language System Information sources Map (1999) 0.00 
    7.387756E-4 = product of:
  0.0014775512 = sum of:
    0.0014775512 = product of:
      0.0029551024 = sum of:
        0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029551024 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.6, S.514-523
  19. Rolland-Thomas, P.: Thesaural codes : an appraisal of their use in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (1993) 0.00 
    6.9652434E-4 = product of:
  0.0013930487 = sum of:
    0.0013930487 = product of:
      0.0027860973 = sum of:
        0.0027860973 = weight(_text_:s in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027860973 = score(doc=549,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    LCSH is known as such since 1975. It always has created headings to serve the LC collections instead of a theoretical basis. It started to replace cross reference codes by thesaural codes in 1986, in a mechanical fashion. It was in no way transformed into a thesaurus. Its encyclopedic coverage, its pre-coordinate concepts make it substantially distinct, considering that thesauri usually map a restricted field of knowledge and use uniterms. The questions raised are whether the new symbols comply with thesaurus standards and if they are true to one or to several models. Explanations and definitions from other lists of subject headings and thesauri, literature in the field of classification and subject indexing will provide some answers. For instance, see refers from a subject heading not used to another or others used. Exceptionally it will lead from a specific term to a more general one. Some equate a see reference with the equivalence relationship. Such relationships are pointed by USE in LCSH. See also references are made from the broader subject to narrower parts of it and also between associated subjects. They suggest lateral or vertical connexions as well as reciprocal relationships. They serve a coordination purpose for some, lay down a methodical search itinerary for others. Since their inception in the 1950's thesauri have been devised for indexing and retrieving information in the fields of science and technology. Eventually they attended to a number of social sciences and humanities. Research derived from thesauri was voluminous. Numerous guidelines are designed. They did not discriminate between the "hard" sciences and the social sciences. RT relationships are widely but diversely used in numerous controlled vocabularies. LCSH's aim is to achieve a list almost free of RT and SA references. It thus restricts relationships to BT/NT, USE and UF. This raises the question as to whether all fields of knowledge can "fit" in the Procrustean bed of RT/NT, i.e., genus/species relationships. Standard codes were devised. It was soon realized that BT/NT, well suited to the genus/species couple could not signal a whole-part relationship. In LCSH, BT and NT function as reciprocals, the whole-part relationship is taken into account by ISO. It is amply elaborated upon by authors. The part-whole connexion is sometimes studied apart. The decision to replace cross reference codes was an improvement. Relations can now be distinguished through the distinct needs of numerous fields of knowledge are not attended to. Topic inclusion, and topic-subtopic, could provide the missing link where genus/species or whole/part are inadequate. Distinct codes, BT/NT and whole/part, should be provided. Sorting relationships with mechanical means can only lead to confusion.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.2, S.71-91
  20. Wirklichkeit und Wissen : Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften (1992) 0.00 
    6.9652434E-4 = product of:
  0.0013930487 = sum of:
    0.0013930487 = product of:
      0.0027860973 = sum of:
        0.0027860973 = weight(_text_:s in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027860973 = score(doc=4606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03771094 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    237 S
    Type
    s

Authors

Languages

  • e 15
  • d 9

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications